I have asked this as yet again another good lead in the cure for Cancer seems to be coming to light and like all the rest I guess this will go to the
way side and no real information being published in a update.
I have read thread after thread about Cancer and how cures are suppressed or that very good leads "seem" to be hijacked with what appears to be
Just a quick search of this site brings up copious amounts of information on the subject.
I am shocked and stunned by the amount of £££$$$$$ that has been pumped into research into the multi Billions and since I can remember I have heard
we are X amount of years from a cure that never comes.
I fully understand that Cancer is complex and comes in many forms, but really we still have not found that silver bullet that means humanity does not
have to live with this terrible disease. We have tech that is beyond belief, we can tear a human body down to the smallest of molecules. We have super
computers that can process mind bending amounts of Data yet we cannot get near a full cure after all this time??. And the ironic thing is that they
nearly have to kill you with chemo to have a chance of curing you..
Would it not be better to crowd fund individual trials such as the one in the below link rather than Trusting
the large charities or
Governments to give the funds and support for a cure?..
On a personal note my dealings with senior members of a certain big Cancer research body about 15 years ago really opened my eyes to what these places
stand for, they are nothing more than businesses with corporate people at the helm that are lining their own pockets, but then as a good patron of ATS
I guess I am preaching to the quire.
Rather than a lead waiting for funding from the Government or one of the Cancer research Cartels they can get direct funding from the public and it
would also be far easier to see how the money is spent and documentation and control would be far easier to track by the crowd fund members. I do not
know if the cure is suppressed by big Pharma I can only go on what I hear. I would be far happier giving my money directly to a Lab or smaller
research team than a floated research body that then swallows up the cash and so the cycle continues.. I just think the odds of foul play would be
greatly reduced and the chance of sabotage far lower.
If you was the head of a business that had obtained the funding that Cancer research has and then shown the results after this time span would it not
be classed a miserable failure???... Yet we still keep funding the same organisations, what if there is a cure that is easily obtained probably
naturally then what happens?.
To say that people who have a vested interest in this have humanity at the core of their thinking is laughable.
It's 2016, I see no reason why we cannot go about this a different way, my son is 17 months old will he still have to worry about Cancer when he is
40??.. If that was the case what the hell are we doing??..
I will say now please do not feel I am being ignorant to the many good people that work for charities on the ground and devote their time to people
with this disease. This is just a open question that I would like the good people here to think about.. Or of someone can come up with a better way to
get this f#cking curse of humanity off our backs...
edit on 4-9-2016 by slider1982 because: (no reason given)