It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The radiation emitted by a nuclear event can be tailored by the design of the nuclear device employed. Geiger counters do no measure all forms of radiation.
On the other hand, dozens or more people reported explosions and booms. Any nuclear devices would likely be quite small in size.
But there should have been dozens of windows blown out not one or two.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: DimensionalChange03
I'm no physicist but even I know there is something eerie about it.
Those buildings should have crumpled like a slinky on a staircase, but instead they collapsed perpendicularly. Throw a balled up piece of paper at the top of a Jenga tower and see the results. Many of us have seen an imploding demolition of buildings before and the falling of the towers looks spookily similar to controlled detonations.
I could be wrong but i'm adamant the two towers should've collapsed in a different way.
originally posted by: ColdChillin
a reply to: neutronflux
Ordinary grade thermite decays very little. Nano thermite is not shelf stable, though. So it's possible they could have positioned the thermite when the building was constructed. It isn't like thermite is new...it was discovered in the 1890's. So, it existed prior the Twin Towers construction. To ignite it, you would just need a magnesium ribbon which are readily available.
Explosives could be planted fairly quickly...by the "security" company that "swept" the building the weekend previous to 9/11. You know, the whole Wirt Walker/Marvin Bush fiasco. Their company...well, they were on the BoD, designed and installed Phase 1 of the electronic security system at WTC. That is fact.
So no, the concept isn't ridiculous.
Sure they were, and the planes were obviously not flown by a couple of arabs with a recently acquired flying license and a few hours on a MS flightsimulator from the year 2000!
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DimensionalChange03
Funny because I live practically at the Langley Air force base and the jets were flying out of there at an amazing rate. Also even jets over Canada could respond to that sector of airspace. Planes were being hijacked all over they didn't know where they would be needed. Plus they are very very fast.. That's the weakest argument I've ever heard associated with this. Our planes were out to lunch.
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: 0bserver1
Its called CONFUSION......
BBC was quoting from Reuters report about collapse of WTC 7
Reuters in turn got their report from local news outlet report that FDNY had pulled back from WTC 7 and set up collapse
zone IN ANTICIPATION of building collapsing
Somewhere along the chain it got garbled
Really think BBC even knew there was a WTC 7 ??
Most people never even heard of the building until the looney fringe started squawking about it as part of some grand
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: firerescue
So what did I see in that report that the video poster marked , was just a faulty background video before the incident as of how building 7 was before it came down?