It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Study concludes explosives used on 911

page: 5
122
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 06:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

LOL


Classic conspiracist. Thinks innuendo and pseudoscience is evidence.




posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

So your argument is first responders died of radiation poisoning so a nuke was used. I pointed out civilians should have died too and long term radiation would have to be from a source of contamination that lasted for weeks if not months. Now your claiming nobody died of radiation poisoning because of advanced nuclear weapons??????



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 06:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman

The blast was directed upwards with a particular fission chamber designed to that end.

Bathtub? There was molten metal for days...

again just my 2 cents.




IIRC, there was molten metal in the debris for *months* after the event.


georgewashington.blogspot.com...



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 06:59 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

N O O O O !!

Not the "mini nukes" crap again....

You are aware that the lowest yield nuclear weapon fielded - W54 for the "DAVY CROCKETT" nuclear recoilless artillery piece generated a lethal burst of radiation (500 Rem) out to 1/4 mile (400 meters)

In fact can use this nuclear weapons effect calculator to see results of weapon

www.nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap

Can actually go the New York and place detonation point at the WTC , go to preset and choose DAVY CROCKETT

Then fire away...

Will see that covers considerable area of Southern Manhattan

Now why were there no radiation casualties ?

Why did Haz MAT teams not detect radiation signatures afterward ?

Actually was health physicist from NYC Board of Health with sensitive radiation instruments on scene during collapse
- found nothing



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 07:01 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Please don't attempt to put my name behind any of your disinformation theories, you know which ones I mean. "No planes", laser beams, mini nukes.

I will go with the evidence, and the evidence points to the use of steel melting technology like nanothermite. I see no reason to make any thing up, or to ignore evidence like others do.

The main point, however, is that I don't have to know exactly what was done, and when, to know that the official story is a lie. Everyone here knows it. Everyone who has spent any time researching if that is.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 07:03 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

Sounds like what hit China.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

sure, then there are the real conspiracies like Iran contra, the real reason for the war in Iraq, and MK ULTRA. To name 3 of a near infinite list.


edit on 9 4 2016 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: DimensionalChange03

Steve must be looking for a little more limelight and more donations from gullible fanboys after the laughable "primer paint is really thermite" paper fiasco. Of course, there is no evidence of explosives -- just more speculation by those who are forcing a conclusion that the suckers really want to believe. This will be an evergreen topic for Stevie and far more profitable than his "Jesus walked among the native Americans" paper.



Complete and total annihilation of everything in the buildings except for the many tons beams ejected hundreds of feet is NOT evidence of gravity now is it.

Not one picture of the towers going down at any time resembles anything else than explosives, and mighty powerful ones too.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: firerescue

so you are a nuclear weapons specialist?



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Jchristopher5

exactly. Its like the Kennedy bullet nonsense. The real burning issue is who wanted him dead, with one or many bullets...

WHO KILLED OUR PRESIDENT?
WHO KILLED THOUSANDS OF OUR PEOPLE?

Thats all we really care about. The rest is just the details that hide the devil.

Really, if it was a demolitions nuke, or nanothermite....who cares.

Who pulled the trigger? They are our enemy and we need to figure that out. They keep attacking and one day they will do damage that can not be ignored.

edit on 9 4 2016 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 07:22 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux




Classic conspiracist.


Wow someone who can't realise that conspiracies happened way before the term conspiracy theory was coined.

"Conspiracy never happens, it's a myth"

Why anybody gives you audience is another mystery.
edit on Rpm90416v31201600000028 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 08:16 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce


originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: nOraKat
blowing out the windows in a uniform line down the building,


Where do you think the air contained within the building went during the collapse.....


I cannot believe you got stars for your reply.

Did you look at the image? They are very thin narrow explosions positioned almost dead center of the building, on each side, occurring at the same exact time.

Explosions were also heard synchronously in succession (boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, etc.) as heard by many fireman.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: firerescue

I already replied to another guy on this (look at the video on my post) but it blew out in very thin narrow jet explosions positioned almost dead center of the building, on each side, occurring at the same exact time, on the same floor; then repeated on a certain number of floors below it, and again

Explosions were also heard synchronously in succession (boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, etc.) as heard by many fireman.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 08:25 PM
link   
a reply to: nOraKat

Funny there are no sound recordings of demolitions setting off in the WTC videos.

Explosions does not equal demolition charges.

If the pressure wave of compressed air was powerful enough to blow out windows, why would there not be a boom, boom, boom. I am sure interior doors and walls where blown open or down too.

The buildings may had a inherited feature or weaknesses the allowed the pressure wave to favor blowing out certain areas first.
edit on 4-9-2016 by neutronflux because: Added sound recordings.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 08:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: neutronflux




Classic conspiracist.


Wow someone who can't realise that conspiracies happened way before the term conspiracy theory was coined.

"Conspiracy never happens, it's a myth"

Why anybody gives you audience is another mystery.


So which is it for WTC 1 and 2? Controlled Demolition? Thermite? Quiet bombs? Lasers or missiles with holograms? Drone jets? Nukes? Dustification?

I didn't say people don't do evil things and conspire to make them happen. I just showed proof in the conspiracy movement that it's fanatics are willing to lie and falsity evidence. Or people making a living pushing conspiracists rely on taking items out of context, ignorance, embellishment, false peer reviewed papers, and use innuendo as evidence for profit.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 08:36 PM
link   
What is funny is that this is the event that likely brought easily more than 50% of the users to ATS.

I am shocked there is anybody here - in this conspiracy site to argue against the conspiracy. I mean what would bring you here?



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 08:44 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux


originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: nOraKat

If the pressure wave of compressed air was powerful enough to blow out windows, why would there not be a boom, boom, boom. I am sure interior doors and walls where blown open or down too.

The buildings may had a inherited feature or weaknesses the allowed the pressure wave to favor blowing out certain areas first.


Ok so I guess the air pressure from the collapsing building decided to blow out in exactly four points in thin narrow jets centered on the building on all four sides, several floors below the collapsing floor.



Anyway this is my last reply.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 08:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: nOraKat
a reply to: neutronflux


originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: nOraKat

If the pressure wave of compressed air was powerful enough to blow out windows, why would there not be a boom, boom, boom. I am sure interior doors and walls where blown open or down too.

The buildings may had a inherited feature or weaknesses the allowed the pressure wave to favor blowing out certain areas first.


Ok so I guess the air pressure from the collapsing building decided to blow out in exactly four points in thin narrow jets centered on the building on all four sides, several floors below the collapsing floor.



Anyway this is my last reply.



Prove it did not have something to do with building ventilation, building weaknesses, or a compromised elevator shaft.

Ok, if it was demolitions, what good would it do to set off those four points that far ahead. Must have been important to risk giving someone this evidence. Why is there no sound of charges detonating in the video?

And if it was a smoking gun, why has a murderous government not shut you down? Why is the video around. By conspiracists's logic, because the government wants it out there?
edit on 4-9-2016 by neutronflux because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 08:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: DimensionalChange03

Steve must be looking for a little more limelight and more donations from gullible fanboys after the laughable "primer paint is really thermite" paper fiasco. Of course, there is no evidence of explosives -- just more speculation by those who are forcing a conclusion that the suckers really want to believe. This will be an evergreen topic for Stevie and far more profitable than his "Jesus walked among the native Americans" paper.



Complete and total annihilation of everything in the buildings except for the many tons beams ejected hundreds of feet is NOT evidence of gravity now is it.

Not one picture of the towers going down at any time resembles anything else than explosives, and mighty powerful ones too.


Jones came up with the thermitic paint simply because he wanted a demolition and there was absolutely no evidence for explosive demolition. Of course, his paper was internally inconsistent and, as a physicist, he either didn't understand thermodynamics or purposely misled his readers. He is either a dolt or a charlatan on that count.

Do you think that those "mighty powerful" explosives you invoke would make a "mighty powerful" bang that would be noticeable? Did any of the many videos show the explosions?
You also say that the towers collapse resembles nothing but explosives. What do you have to compare it with? How would the towers have collapsed had they succumbed to fire?
edit on 9/4/2016 by pteridine because: spelling error



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 08:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: nOraKat
What is funny is that this is the event that likely brought easily more than 50% of the users to ATS.

I am shocked there is anybody here - in this conspiracy site to argue against the conspiracy. I mean what would bring you here?


To see the some same old arguments debunked by dozens of reliable people on the internet played out here again. It's like groundhog day the movie.




top topics



 
122
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join