It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Study concludes explosives used on 911

page: 34
131
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:11 PM
link   
nvrmnd...
edit on 26-11-2016 by SyxPak because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

Who is making the claim anything was vaporized? Dr wood and dustificatuon?

They keep statistics of the material removed from the WTC.

There are calculations on the amount of dust released from the WTC collapse.

Please prove mass when missing by "vaporization".



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Except that firemen reported said heat.


A review of of the documentary Collateral Damage in the New York Post describes firemen at Ground Zero recalling "heat so intense they encountered rivers of molten steel.

911research.wtc7.net...



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Didn't You see the dust covering the ends of those beams? Those guys are first responders. No one cut anything while on the ground there, at that point... If You refuse to see the dust covering, then we have to agree to disagree. Wow Man. How much do You get paid?

edit on 26-11-2016 by SyxPak because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:24 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

As for Your last sentence, does this show You " Rain of forcefully exploding steel."?
Look up the side of the building. Those Beams did not come out of the building they are sticking out of...



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:26 PM
link   
a reply to: SyxPak

It's from ironworks cutting beams during debri removal.

If that was a slow cut from a standing building under load, the weight of the building would have pushed the molten ends together. The columns would have cold weld after cold weld.

Finally, the Movement argument it has to be controlled demolition to achieve the witnessed collapse speed. The narrative each floor of the WTC needed demolitions. Each floor supposedly had cut columns from the top down. The pile should have been populated with hundreds of column segments with cut ends one to two stories in length. Have any pictures of that? If that was the case, why the need to use ironworks and equipment to cut columns during debri removal?



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:29 PM
link   
Some of these people are just to bull headed to even talk to...they think and what to hear what the news tell them...MAYBE JUST MAYBE some day they will wake up..and see the real truth on all this..i have seen so many videos on this and other info on this as well...and why just why cant they all see the truth on how it really happen...Bush wanted a war so he blames another country for doing it..funny he wasnt in any hurry to do any thing about as he was reading at a school the time this happen...it seemed to me he didnt even care and maybe he was happy for it happening..he has said he was going to finish what his dad coudlnt..so think about that one...GROW THE HELL UP PEOPLE AND SEE THE REAL PICTURE HERE..JUST WOW...YOU DONT EVEN WANT TO REPLY TO ME AS I WILL GO OFF ON YOU BIG TIME....SEE ME AS A PERSON WHO CAN SEE THE TRUTH OR NOT SEE ME AT ALL..AND TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH I DONT EVEN POST AT TO MANY PLACES...SO THIS IS REALLY THE FIRST ONE THAT GOT ME PRETTY PI$$ED OFF..JUST LOOK AT THOSE PICTURES MAYBE THEN YOU WILL SEE THINGS IN ANOTHER WAY...

edit on 26-11-2016 by ccbears because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-11-2016 by ccbears because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:30 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

DO You not think they took gravity into account? Would You not think the beams, simultaniously cut, could have been cut from the top down, blowing away most of the slag as the cuts happened on their way down? I torch cut that way. Pretty simple really. Is a no brainer common sense fact...

Again. Did You see the dust covering everything in that photo? Including the ends of the cut beams??
edit on 26-11-2016 by SyxPak because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Speaking of removal. Why did they, your people, not treat that entire area as a crime scene. You know, do not touch ANYTHING till it has been fully investigated. But no. Steel beams were being removed from the site almost immediately. WTF is that all about?
edit on 26-11-2016 by SyxPak because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: SyxPak

That's falling debris! Something about potential energy converted to kinetic energy.

Any reports of victims sustaining injuries similar to being hit with shrapnel from an antipersonnel mine. Blast shrapnel pulled from Victims, bodies, remains, buildings, equipment. The streets would be littered with shrapnel equivalence to anti personnel charges. Any reports from the coroner recovering blast shrapnel from bodies? Death by explosion? Any reports of EMTs or emergency rooms pulling blast shrapnel from victims? Any reports of Firefighters injured by blast shrapnel.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:44 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

I'd buy kinetic energy. But will only give you a quarter for it. If it was true then, there would have been beams thrown places all around in a circle basically. Into the sides of every structure around. I would think that would have hit the MSM for sure, but didn't. Why not? Any photos with that?

Glass shrapnel in the faces of those in the lower lobby when all the glass blew out from explosions I guess doesn't count huh:
Why did all that glass get blown out. I know, You will say because of the plane impact. Sorry but No. It happened a while after the planes hit.

As far as people inside the bldgs when it came down on them? I haven't seen anything showing any victims period. Let alone images of shrapnel embedded people....
Also I have asked You this three times now. Again. Did You see the dust covering everything in that photo? Including the ends of the cut beams??
Why will You not answer that simple question?!?!?
edit on 26-11-2016 by SyxPak because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: SyxPak

Sorry, you sad little rant does not hide the fact you are willing to use pictures out of context.

The had a very systemic system of inspections at the pile. It's been covered hundred of times. Law enforcement and explosives technicians with engineers stationed at the pile. Conducting inspection during debri removal. When needed, they would hand remove remains, personal effects, and evidence by hand. Put aside items for evaluation. The debris was segregated and loaded into trucks. The trucks went to other side were the debris was further organized. Large items in layday yards for engineers and FBI and small debris searched by hand. FBI and other law enforcement were present to identify evidence and remains and tag them and log the items.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Nice try to piss Me off. Didn't work.

Again. Did You see the dust covering everything in that photo? Including the ends of the cut beams??
Again. Did You see the dust covering everything in that photo? Including the ends of the cut beams??
Again. Did You see the dust covering everything in that photo? Including the ends of the cut beams??



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

You have a quote with no source and acrediitedy to no person, so?

In the NIST reports, which is the official narrative, please reference where it mentions vaporization.

The molten material was committed y be up the page. Please use that for further reference.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: SyxPak

All of downtown was swinging in toxic dust as outlined by the EPA debacle for weeks.

Ever been to a construction site? It's dusty. Equipment creates dust. Removing debris creates dust. Everything results in dust.
edit on 26-11-2016 by neutronflux because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Wow dude. Are You on another page of your instruction manual or something? Forgot that You said what I had in quotes?!
How's this for source. A page back. LINK HERE. Your last sentence here:

"posted (By You BTW) on Nov, 26 2016 @ 12:46 PM link quote reply a reply to: SyxPak

Also, if the puffs of dry wall and insulation where really from "Squibs" by explosives:

One, explosives close enough to the outter wall to see the effects of the pressure waves in dust would also be accompanied with the sound energy of a blast.

Two, if the pressure wave was interacting with dust outside the towers, each instance would be accompanied with the associated shrapnel of fragmented columns. Rain of forcefully exploding steel."

I'm outta here. It was real and it was fun. But hopefully not too much fun. For You. HAFUD. Syx...


edit on 26-11-2016 by SyxPak because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: SyxPak


So you have pictures out of context.

Cannot explain the cherry picked seismic data.

Cannot explain the lack of recorded sound which should be present with blasts.

Especially if explosives were creating visible squids.

How an installed system of detonations survived jet impacts and fire damage.

Have not countered the "explosions" heard in the lobby were crashing elevators.

No columns recovered were prepared for CD

No columns recovered were worked on by explosives nor thermite.

How two CDs of a never performed high rise building top down implosion using thermite was perfectly carried out twice in one day by systems deranged by jet impacts and fire.

And there is no evidence of shape charge fragments, blasting cap fragments recovered from the pile or victims.

No remains of remote detonation devices.

Total lack of shrapnel.

Please do tell, was the system of CD as Richard Gauge explains. Demolitions that only fizzle no flash?

The the whole Jones debacle. It was thermite on the columns. No it's thermite painted on the ceiling. No, thermite was just a fuse.



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 02:10 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

Sorry was tied up. Yah all that and the little detail was Good!
Syx...



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Well so I missed some. I don't have it all written down in a manual. So there is that. Doesn't matter. Neither of us are going to change our minds so I'm leaving it at that. This could, and will, go on for years. I am not gettin paid to be here bouncing F'ng BS back and forth with you, so later... Syx...



posted on Nov, 26 2016 @ 02:19 PM
link   
a reply to: SyxPak

You throw as much junk on the wall, forcing arguments to change context on the fly? Then you take was is said out of context and don't like the context?

I tried to answer the context of you questions best as possible and with transparency, then you totally leave before answering my points of interest. Also trying to pass pictures out of context?

Very dishonest and sad.

Then to ignore the extensive effort which was used to recover remains, personal effects for ID, and evidence from the WTC debris?
edit on 26-11-2016 by neutronflux because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
131
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join