It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Alt-Right White Nationalism Straight From Milo

page: 3
30
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Logarock

I'm pretty sure that whenever a white person says, "Let's have a frank conversation on race." Someone would label that "dog whistle." Funny how Holder can get away with it due to his skin color.

IME, people who say that really only want to lecture, not talk.




posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:05 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Inform yourself. Don't let your rear guard down just because you think you have friends standing behind you.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Logarock




Yes as if white people have no stake it what happens and are to be politically reduced as a group, unless apologetic and liberal, so they can be bullied and intimidated.


WTF are you talking about. I'm white as rice, just try and bully and intimidate me. whine whine whine....



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

The ALT-right, in its philosophy is just another incarnation of racialist right-wing dogma. It is the tea party with a bald head, a conservative Fox newser without a necktie.

What's wrong with the alt-right is that it draws in the old( KKK) and new time( Alex Jones and Breitbart) racists within their right-wing subset.

They are the carriers of the of new and accepted hatred and racism within their anti-politically correct rhetorical dogma.


Bottom line...the alt-right is all( alt) wrong



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: Logarock




Yes as if white people have no stake it what happens and are to be politically reduced as a group, unless apologetic and liberal, so they can be bullied and intimidated.


WTF are you talking about. I'm white as rice, just try and bully and intimidate me. whine whine whine....


You know there is such a thing as brown rice?

You mean your as white as Uncle Ben's white rice...right?

Uncle ben is a black man

can you deal with that



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Logarock

It's not a reaction to the left. It's a reaction to Neo-Nazi's being unable to gain ground in the mainstream with all their visible extremism.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: thesaneone
Post it again and I bet you still get the same results.

I'll give you a cookie for your enthusiasm but Trump supporters have made up their minds just like Clinton supporters have so all your doing is wasting your energy on this.
I don't think so. I think republicans have been jumping ship right and left. They are all scared trump will drag them down too.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

Does that bother you? Is this what this is about? How much the white race has lost or what?



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: ketsuko

Inform yourself. Don't let your rear guard down just because you think you have friends standing behind you.


Inform myself on race? I can't help it. I am informed on it every day.

There is nowhere you can go, nothing you can do, where race is not a prominent feature.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:13 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12 That wasn't aimed at you.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

Am I supposed to admire you for blanket calling people racist when many of them have not done anything to label them as such?

Are you on some high horse for questioning if people are OK with someone being black?

And if you truly believe you're some soldier fighting against racism do you realize by going around calling people that with no merit is perpetuating the very thing you fight.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

The KKK is always looking for a place to land. Years ago it was the Democrat Party.


Do you folks also understand that the actual party of KKK has membership that is so low it cant even register on a seismograph. But by god you get a few of them dressed up for Halloween with some flags and shizz and the press is all a stumble quoting and assigning associations and allegiance.


edit on 3-9-2016 by Logarock because: n



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:15 PM
link   
I'm not sure why I bother...



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: Logarock




Yes as if white people have no stake it what happens and are to be politically reduced as a group, unless apologetic and liberal, so they can be bullied and intimidated.


WTF are you talking about. I'm white as rice, just try and bully and intimidate me. whine whine whine....


You know there is such a thing as brown rice?

You mean your as white as Uncle Ben's white rice...right?

Uncle ben is a black man

can you deal with that


I can deal with anything! I do get annoyed by Trump supporters making excuses for not being accepted by the very people they insult.
edit on 3-9-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:17 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Inform yourself about the alt-right.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Logarock

What? That's your issue is it not?



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Logarock

What? That's your issue is it not?


No my issue is that whites can speak if they have issues just like the other races in this country. Don't mean anyone's in for race superiority and the like although I wonder about the NAACP and Black Panthers.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

It won't matter.

By the time this cycle is done, I'll be part of it whether I am or not, just like the TEA Party was all racist whether we were or not.

With the left, labels are simply made to be applied to anyone whose ideas you don't like and that's about the extent of it. It doesn't actually matter who truly is one thing or another.

So there is no point in trying to pin down a definition or arguing it. It's just a Kafka Trap meant to distract and delegitimize, and attempt to make people defend themselves rather than actually to argue ideas on their own merits.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: theantediluvian

Actually this is very much from you, because your the spin doctor trying to equate nationalism with racism. You take snipits from a news article than put your own personal spin on what it's suppose to mean, even when it's clearly utterly ridiculous.

This should be put in the LOL bin.


Wow, you're really triggered now aren't you? The truth made you a little uncomfortable?

These are not my words:


They are mostly white, mostly male middle-American radicals, who are unapologetically embracing a new identity politics that prioritises the interests of their own demographic.


Why don't you tell me what that sentence means in your own words? How about this one?


The conservative instinct, as described by Haidt, includes a preference for homogeneity over diversity


Let's take a look at a few of who the authors cite as influential intellectuals of the movement:


The origins of the alternative right can be found in thinkers as diverse as Oswald Spengler, H.L Mencken, Julius Evola, Sam Francis,


Julius Evola


Mussolini read Evola's Synthesis of the Doctrine of Race (Sintesi di Dottrina della Razza) in August 1941, and met with Evola to offer him his praise. Evola later recounted that Mussolini had found in his work a uniquely Roman form of fascist racism distinct from that found in Nazi Germany. With Mussolini's backing, Evola launched the minor-journal Sangue e Spirito [Blood and Spirit]. While not always in agreement with German racial theorists, Evola traveled to Germany in February 1942 and obtained support for German collaboration on Sangue e Spirito from leading Nazi race theorists.[9]

A number of Evola's articles and books deal explicitly with the subject of race. In February 1939, the Race Office in Italy had a nationalist, "Mediterranean" change of personnel. The new President of High Council of Demography and Race, Giacomo Acerbo, replaced a nutrition professor. The political rise of Alberto Luchini, and the institutionalized racists from May 1941, coincided with Evola's school of thought.[41] The convergence of the esoteric and metaphysical theories in Italy marked an effective adoption of more Nordic radicalism in Blood and Spirit.[42] A.J. Gregor comments: "In the [German translation of Imperialismo pagano], Evola considered principled anti-Semitism one of the essentials of a salvific 'racial rebirth' in the modern world. Not only did Evola make a point of identifying Karl Marx, one of the architects of the modern world of materialism, inferiority, pretended equality, and cultural decay, as a Jew--but he spoke of a Jewish capitalistic yoke that obstructed every effort at racial regeneration"


Samuel T Francis


Francis explicitly linked American success with European demographics: It is all very well to point to black cotton-pickers and Chinese railroad workers, but the cotton fields and the railroads were there because white people wanted them and knew how to put them there. Almost all non-European contributors to American history either have been made by individuals and groups that have assimilated Euro-American ideas, values, and goals, or have been conceived, organized, and directed by white leaders.[26]

Francis also called for "white racial consciousness," equating it with Eurocentrism, the "supremacy of white European culture." He distanced this view from white separatism or the white supremacy "obtained under slavery or segregation." He said "there is no reason why nonwhites who reside in the United States could not enjoy equality of legal rights."[28] He also denied that he proposed "political domination of one race by another or military or coercive 'conquest' in any literal sense."[29] Still, he argued: Whites would simply no longer countenance nonwhite aggression and insults or the idolization of nonwhite heroes, icons, and culture; white children would be raised in accordance with what is proper to being white, and norms openly recognized as appropriate to whites would be the legitimizing and dominant norms of American society as they were prior to the 1960s. Racial guilt and truckling would end.[28][30]


H.L. Mencken


Mencken opposed American entry into World War I and World War II. His diary indicates that he harbored strong racist and antisemitic attitudes, and was sympathetic to the Social Darwinism practiced by the Nazis.[3] Mencken had a general enthusiasm for militarism, though never in its American form. “War is a good thing,” he even once wrote, “because it is honest, it admits the central fact of human nature…. A nation too long at peace becomes a sort of gigantic old maid.”[4]


It's right there in plain English.

You don't have to take my word for it. I chose this article because it was co-authored by a man that many of the more far-right people on ATS hold in esteem and it was published (again, in MARCH) on Breitbart, a media source that I'm sure you won't actively discredit.

If you don't agree with them, take it up with the authors, not me.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 06:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Logarock

It's not a reaction to the left. It's a reaction to Neo-Nazi's being unable to gain ground in the mainstream with all their visible extremism.


Do you understand that Nazis killed many many whites. White folks THEMSELVES view Nazis as enemies of their own F*IN race. Have you not read any history. Whites hate fu*in Nazis.




top topics



 
30
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join