Hillary destroyed many of her cell phones with hammers

originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Indigo5


Very good....

Now post the destruction methods for classified communications equipment.

You have a knack for rushing to say stuff that is crazy wrong.

The link I provided are guidelines for EXACTLY classified mobile equipment. That doc I linked are the guidelines for gov. agencies including NSA and CIA...Did you miss this part in the link??

"NSA Media Destruction Guidance "

And it says "Pulverize"...as in hammer..

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Indigo5


Very good....

Now post the destruction methods for classified communications equipment.

You have a knack for rushing to say stuff that is crazy wrong.

The link I provided are guidelines for EXACTLY classified mobile equipment. That doc I linked are the guidelines for gov. agencies including NSA and CIA...Did you miss this part in the link??

"NSA Media Destruction Guidance "

And it says "Pulverize"...as in hammer..

Cool... where is the signed destruction forms with two signatures.... have they produced that yet?

You are aware of the fact that all classified communication devices used by the US Government are tracked from creation to destruction via the SF-153. Been that way for decades.

The proper destruction of a classified communications device would always be accompanied by the corresponding SF-153.

NSA has a vast network set up that handles nothing but classified communications equipment. All government agencies that deal in classified communications have a communications security (COMSEC) section that falls under NSA jurisdiction.

But we are talking about an unauthorized device owned by Hillary Clinton that had classified data on it. Apples and Oranges.

Your comparison is invalid by trying to say that smashing her blackberry with a hammer was ok because it met all NSA standards dealing with Controlled Cryptographic Items (CCI, which is what every single piece of classified communication devices used by the US Government fall under) when there is zero proof that all NSA standards were ever met, namely being the associated and required paperwork that goes along with the issuing and destruction of CCI.

#1 point being that her Blackberrys were not NSA approved to start with for classified communications. That is the very bottom line.

a reply to: TheBulk

This is surely destruction of evidence!

Maybe someone will get wise, and see from
the agencies when the last time these were used?

GPS sat positions?

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Indigo5


Very good....

Now post the destruction methods for classified communications equipment.

You have a knack for rushing to say stuff that is crazy wrong.

The link I provided are guidelines for EXACTLY classified mobile equipment. That doc I linked are the guidelines for gov. agencies including NSA and CIA...Did you miss this part in the link??

"NSA Media Destruction Guidance "

And it says "Pulverize"...as in hammer..

Cool... where is the signed destruction forms with two signatures.... have they produced that yet?

You are aware of the fact that all classified communication devices used by the US Government are tracked from creation to destruction via the SF-153. Been that way for decades.

The proper destruction of a classified communications device would always be accompanied by the corresponding SF-153.

NSA has a vast network set up that handles nothing but classified communications equipment. All government agencies that deal in classified communications have a communications security (COMSEC) section that falls under NSA jurisdiction.

But we are talking about an unauthorized device owned by Hillary Clinton that had classified data on it. Apples and Oranges.

Your comparison is invalid by trying to say that smashing her blackberry with a hammer was ok because it met all NSA standards dealing with Controlled Cryptographic Items (CCI, which is what every single piece of classified communication devices used by the US Government fall under) when there is zero proof that all NSA standards were ever met, namely being the associated and required paperwork that goes along with the issuing and destruction of CCI.

#1 point being that her Blackberrys were not NSA approved to start with for classified communications. That is the very bottom line.

Imagine the crap she'll pull as President. Obama 2.0

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

Imagine the crap she'll pull as President. Obama 2.0

You say that like its a bad thing.

Are you serious.

Obama has been a train wreck. I couldn't believe anyone could have been worse than Bush, but Obama beat him for wrecking just about everything. If you think things are better, I'd have to say you're not part of the 99% that have had it rough since 2009.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: intrepid
I thought the were unaccounted for. That didn't fly so now this? What next? Hummingbirds stole the cell phones?

Maybe not a hummingbird...but an African swallow, perhaps.

Yes but African swallows aren't migratory.

Wait a minute -- supposing two European swallows carried it together?

Bwahahahaha.....

*how to keep this on topic*

Maybe he'll promise shrubberies.

ETA: Damn, wrong thread.

Yeah. I was all ready and primed to discuss this whole Hillary mess with some Hillary supporters and then wham! I got Pythoned out of it.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
So...uh....how are these people not in jail?

Justice Department gave most of them immunity.

www.nytimes.com...

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Are you serious.

Obama has been a train wreck. I couldn't believe anyone could have been worse than Bush, but Obama beat him for wrecking just about everything. If you think things are better, I'd have to say you're not part of the 99% that have had it rough since 2009.

No, i'm part of the majority that think Obama has done a great job.

Care to provide anything to back up the 99% claim, or is that just hyperbole?

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Are you serious.

Obama has been a train wreck. I couldn't believe anyone could have been worse than Bush, but Obama beat him for wrecking just about everything. If you think things are better, I'd have to say you're not part of the 99% that have had it rough since 2009.

No, i'm part of the majority that think Obama has done a great job.

Care to provide anything to back up the 99% claim, or is that just hyperbole?

Yes, Obama has done a good job at screwing things up pretty well. I'll have to agree with you there. Majority? Majority of what? Lemmings?!

Under Obama unemployment is cresting around the 20% mark. Maybe you're in your alternate universe safespace with your Obama propaganda TV stations taking in the propaganda and buying it. Never figured an ATS member to be so gullible. Go to the big boys websites like John Williams Shadow Stats and see how real unemployment numbers are figured (not the fudged govt. crap) and you'll be enlightened.

John Williams Shadow Stats

Daily Job Cuts

Cisco to lay off about 14,000 employees

Oh yeah, happy days are here again (sarc).

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Are you serious.

Obama has been a train wreck. I couldn't believe anyone could have been worse than Bush, but Obama beat him for wrecking just about everything. If you think things are better, I'd have to say you're not part of the 99% that have had it rough since 2009.

No, i'm part of the majority that think Obama has done a great job.

Care to provide anything to back up the 99% claim, or is that just hyperbole?

Yes, Obama has done a good job at screwing things up pretty well. I'll have to agree with you there. Majority? Majority of what? Lemmings?!

Under Obama unemployment is cresting around the 20% mark. Maybe you're in your alternate universe safespace with your Obama propaganda TV stations taking in the propaganda and buying it. Never figured an ATS member to be so gullible. Go to the big boys websites like John Williams Shadow Stats and see how real unemployment numbers are figured (not the fudged govt. crap) and you'll be enlightened.

John Williams Shadow Stats

Daily Job Cuts

Cisco to lay off about 14,000 employees

Oh yeah, happy days are here again (sarc).

Yeah I'm pretty happy.

Clearly you are pretty upset about this subject so I'll leave you to your sadness, Obama is pretty well loved across the globe though. Stay sour.

a reply to: SudoNim

How the World Fell Out of Love with Obama

How the World Fell Out of Love with Obama

Read more: www.politico.com...
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Clearly, you are one of a minority untouched by Obama's poor policies and actions. Good for you.

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Are you serious.

Obama has been a train wreck. I couldn't believe anyone could have been worse than Bush, but Obama beat him for wrecking just about everything. If you think things are better, I'd have to say you're not part of the 99% that have had it rough since 2009.

No, i'm part of the majority that think Obama has done a great job.

Care to provide anything to back up the 99% claim, or is that just hyperbole?

And if you need more cold hard facts there's this:

Tent Cities Full Of Homeless People Are Booming In Cities All Over America As Poverty Spikes

Yeah Obama is doing a good job at being a bad President.

That lying bag of disgust cant even stand up for twenty minutes without falling down or coughing, I doubt she herself beat anything with anything, she cant even walk, she can lie though.

She can't do the debates. Will she Skype it in resting in her room?