It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Hillary destroyed many of her cell phones with hammers

page: 6
68
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 01:16 AM
link   




posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 01:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vasteel
Non-American here, but I don't see how anyone who reads ATS could possibly consider voting for Hillary. That's would be like saying "why yes, I am happy with the corrupt TPTB political ruling class and I'd like some more please". OK, Trump isn't perfect but at least he's not a one of those TPTB people.

Are people just voting along party loyalty - "I always vote Democrat, so I always will do no matter what"?

Trump is a racist straight white heterosexual male alternative right-wing conspiracy-theorist.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 04:45 AM
link   
At least you americans get to vote your next leader us brits just get one in through the back door



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 05:39 AM
link   
Just the act of doing this is an admission of guilt, I still have all of the smartphones I've ever had, I never trade them in for the whole $20 they offer to give you for them. And I don't have a problem with anything that is on any of them. Only someone who had something to hide would destroy them with a hammer.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 05:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: Vasteel
Non-American here, but I don't see how anyone who reads ATS could possibly consider voting for Hillary. That's would be like saying "why yes, I am happy with the corrupt TPTB political ruling class and I'd like some more please". OK, Trump isn't perfect but at least he's not a one of those TPTB people.

Are people just voting along party loyalty - "I always vote Democrat, so I always will do no matter what"?

Trump is a racist straight white heterosexual male alternative right-wing conspiracy-theorist.


Said by a racist hater of conservative white heterosexual men. Might want to think about looking at how sick what you just said is.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 10:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: Vasteel
Non-American here, but I don't see how anyone who reads ATS could possibly consider voting for Hillary. That's would be like saying "why yes, I am happy with the corrupt TPTB political ruling class and I'd like some more please". OK, Trump isn't perfect but at least he's not a one of those TPTB people.

Are people just voting along party loyalty - "I always vote Democrat, so I always will do no matter what"?

Trump is a racist straight white heterosexual male alternative right-wing conspiracy-theorist.


I sure hope your post is sarcastic. If not, then way to gobble up the narrative the MSM wants you to believe. And for the record, Hillary is much more racist than Trump could ever be. But you ignore that fact. And what does being heterosexual and male have to do with anything?



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa
It Feels Good to Be a Clinton



LOL



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 11:14 AM
link   
If a Blackberry was destroyed that contain classified data, whether that data was captured by the Blackberry Enertprise server doesn't matter.

If a Blackberry was destroyed using a hammer and that Blackberry held a local copy of classified emails, that would be improper destruction of classified data.

A moot point...just having classified data on a unclassified Blackberry is by itself, negligence in the handling of classified data.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 11:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa
If a Blackberry was destroyed that contain classified data, whether that data was captured by the Blackberry Enertprise server doesn't matter.

If a Blackberry was destroyed using a hammer and that Blackberry held a local copy of classified emails, that would be improper destruction of classified data.

A moot point...just having classified data on a unclassified Blackberry is by itself, negligence in the handling of classified data.


But....but.....it was only emails about yoga and Chelsea's wedding. So important Hill had to use Bleachbit and destroy Blackberries.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 12:17 PM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk




posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 03:43 PM
link   
a reply to: 76redfez

As do we, but they make it seem like we had a vote in it. The next president is already chosen. They are just the face of america, they are puppets and spokespersons. No matter who the next president is, the same agenda will continue to unfold.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 04:04 PM
link   
Why isn't this destruction of government property? I believe that is a crime.



posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 10:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: RickinVa
If a Blackberry was destroyed that contain classified data, whether that data was captured by the Blackberry Enertprise server doesn't matter.

If a Blackberry was destroyed using a hammer and that Blackberry held a local copy of classified emails, that would be improper destruction of classified data.

A moot point...just having classified data on a unclassified Blackberry is by itself, negligence in the handling of classified data.


But....but.....it was only emails about yoga and Chelsea's wedding. So important Hill had to use Bleachbit and destroy Blackberries.


Just imagine her paranoia about dealing with other world leaders, not just tech devices. Her insecurities will lead her to do some crazy stuff. She scares me more than Trump. I think she'll win though so I hope people around her contain that crazy paranoia of hers.
edit on 4-9-2016 by thepixelpusher because: typo



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 12:11 AM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk

Wow, that is one unhappy reporter! Classic, watching her try and shut down the facts, and seeing the look on her face when the hammers were confirmed. How anyone can know about this, and still want to vote for that woman, I cannot fathom.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 10:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: Vasteel
Non-American here, but I don't see how anyone who reads ATS could possibly consider voting for Hillary. That's would be like saying "why yes, I am happy with the corrupt TPTB political ruling class and I'd like some more please". OK, Trump isn't perfect but at least he's not a one of those TPTB people.

Are people just voting along party loyalty - "I always vote Democrat, so I always will do no matter what"?

Trump is a racist straight white heterosexual male alternative right-wing conspiracy-theorist.


Apart from "racist" and possibly "right wing", everything else in your description of him is fine.
Or am I missing something?



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasteel

Yes, but you're not alone, seems as if a couple people missed it too.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk

13 Mobile Devices
5 iPads

That were in "some way" used with her server.

And in "some cases" the State department destroyed them with hammers.

I destroy HD's and old phones with a hammer...And I am not in Gov. ...But I do have a job that regulary deals with NDA material.

The idea that State Department employees regularly destroy their old mobile devices is not unusual in the least.

These were not all Hillary's devices...they were all the devices that had been used to communicate with her Server by State Department employees.

What do you think is sinister about this?



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 09:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
Why isn't this destruction of government property? I believe that is a crime.


To the Contrary...

Government Guidelines for getting rid of old Mobile Devices..



All other mobile devices
This includes cell phones, smart phones, PDAs, tablets, and other devices not covered in the preceding mobile categories.

Clear:
Manually delete all information, then perform a full manufacturer’s reset to reset the mobile device to factory state. Sanitization performed via a remote wipe should be treated as a Clear operation, and it is not possible to verify the sanitization results.

Purge:
See Destroy. Many mobile devices only offer capabilities to Clear (and not Purge) the data contents. A mobile device may offer Purge capabilities, but these capabilities are specific to the hardware and software of the device and should be applied with caution. The device manufacturer should be referred to in order to identify whether the device has a Purge capability that applies media-dependent techniques (such as rewriting or block erasing) or Cryptographic Erase to ensure that data recovery is infeasible, and that the device does not simply remove the file pointers.

Destroy:
Shred, Disintegrate, Pulverize, or Incinerate by burning the device in a licensed incinerator.

Notes:
Following the Clear or (if applicable) Purge operation, manually navigate to multiple areas of the device (such as call history, browser history, files, photos, etc.) to verify that no personal information has been retained on the device.
For both Clear and (if applicable) Purge, refer to the manufacturer for proper sanitization procedure.

nvlpubs.nist.gov...



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 09:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5


Very good....

Now post the destruction methods for classified communications equipment.

You would find they are vastly different. Such as requiring two signatures on a destruction form that the signers had physically verified the destruction of said device in a manner consistent with the regulations put forth by NSA.

In other words, there are completely different destruction protocols for equipment that held classified data as opposed to equipment that held unclassified data.

edit on R512016-09-06T09:51:13-05:00k519Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R522016-09-06T09:52:06-05:00k529Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 10:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5


This publication has been developed by NIST in accordance with its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (FISMA), 44 U.S.C. § 3541 et seq., Public Law 107-347. NIST is responsible for developing information security standards and guidelines, including
minimum requirements for Federal information systems, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply
to national security systems without the express approval of appropriate Federal officials exercising policy authority over such systems





new topics

top topics



 
68
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join