It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

UFO Destroyed the Falcon-9 Rocket /SpaceX/Facebook & Israeli Aerospace Industries

page: 29
143
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

He's been shown evidence by a number of members, but for some reason he chooses to ignore it.




posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TerryDon79

Well, to be fair, the rockets he dealt with did not launch orbital satellites. So maybe he's not aware that such satellites often carry highly volatile fuels.

I did try to explain that to him, but...
No Phage all you did was deflect and never once did you answer my questions. Nor did i ever say i was a rocket scientist? i only provided my resume after being told I knew nothing about rockets. Thats all. Still my question from pages ago is still being deflected and not answered.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Phage

He's been shown evidence by a number of members, but for some reason he chooses to ignore it.
No you have not. What i asked and thew given answers where two different things.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Naturallywired

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Phage

He's been shown evidence by a number of members, but for some reason he chooses to ignore it.
No you have not. What i asked and thew given answers where two different things.


Only because you chose to ignore them or discount them.

Do you really need to believe that it's a UFO so badly that you resort to the tactics you have in this thread?



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Naturallywired




No Phage all you did was deflect and never once did you answer my questions.
False.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 9/6/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Naturallywired

No disrespect but proposing this disaster was the result of an attack from a Time machine and UFO
while over looking the fact (and easy google) that the nose cone contained propellant does not add to your resume.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Naturallywired




No Phage all you did was deflect and never once did you answer my questions.
False.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
No phage you said the satellite used fuel in space. Space don't work that way there is no oxegen. Then you went on with other disinfo tactics. Sorry i am done with your lies here on ATS phage. You always comeback with links that proove nothing and or are misrepresented, Sorry not buying it Phage. NOPE!



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: all2human
a reply to: Naturallywired

No disrespect but proposing this disaster was the result of an attack from a Time machine and UFO
while over looking the fact (and easy google) that the nose cone contained propellant does not add to your resume.

propellant for what? Space? There is no oxegen in space. Forced compressed air maybe for movements with thrust.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Naturallywired

That's why they add an oxidiser to the mix.

You should have known that though.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Naturallywired

That's why they add an oxidiser to the mix.

You should have known that though.
is a oxidiser explosive? Oh and do tell about this mix?
edit on 9 6 2016 by Naturallywired because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Naturallywired



No phage you said the satellite used fuel in space.

So, you didn't bother to glance at the links I posted.
Tell me, how do you think that spacecraft dock with the ISS? Compressed air? Really?

You know, your suborbital rockets were not very advanced. Technology progressed a bit in the 60s and 70s.

edit on 9/6/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Naturallywired



No phage you said the satellite used fuel in space.

Tell me, how do you think that spacecraft dock with the ISS?
Not with explosive fuels. Compressed jets of air with substrates.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Naturallywired

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Naturallywired

That's why they add an oxidiser to the mix.

You should have known that though.
is a oxidiser explosive? Oh and do tell about this mix?


Depends on what it's mixed with. It also depends on which oxidiser is used.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Naturallywired




Compressed jets of air with substrates.

No. Another link, which you will ignore.
en.wikipedia.org...

Hydrazine, sound familiar?

edit on 9/6/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Naturallywired




Compressed jets of air with substrates.

No. Another link, which you will ignore.
en.wikipedia.org...

Hydrazine, sound familiar?
It's non flamamble also
en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Naturallywired




Compressed jets of air with substrates.

No. Another link, which you will ignore.
en.wikipedia.org...

Hydrazine, sound familiar?


And it's mixed with.....

DUM DUM DUMMMMMM....

An oxidiser (nitrogen tetroxide)!



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Naturallywired

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Naturallywired




Compressed jets of air with substrates.

No. Another link, which you will ignore.
en.wikipedia.org...

Hydrazine, sound familiar?
It's non flamamble also
en.wikipedia.org...


THATS THE OXIDISER!

Are you sure you worked with rockets?
edit on 692016 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Naturallywired
Your link is not about hydrazine.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Naturallywired




Compressed jets of air with substrates.

No. Another link, which you will ignore.
en.wikipedia.org...

Hydrazine, sound familiar?
Your post says Hydrazine, lol
And its non flammable
en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 01:41 AM
link   
It says right on this page non flamable, right to the left.
en.wikipedia.org...
Nitrogen tetroxide is used as an oxidizer in one of the more important rocket propellants because it can be stored as a liquid at room temperature. In early 1944 research on the usability of dinitrogen tetroxide as an oxidizing agent for rocket fuel was conducted by German scientists, although the Nazis only used it to a very limited extent as an additive for S-Stoff (fuming nitric acid). It became the storable oxidizer of choice for many rockets in both the United States and USSR by the late 1950s. It is a hypergolic propellant in combination with a hydrazine-based rocket fuel. One of the earliest uses of this combination was on the Titan family of rockets used originally as ICBMs and then as launch vehicles for many spacecraft. Used on the U.S. Gemini and Apollo spacecraft and also on the Space Shuttle, it continues to be used as stationkeeping propellant on most geo-stationary satellites, and many deep-space probes. It now seems likely that NASA will continue to use this oxidizer in the next-generation 'crew-vehicles' which will replace the shuttle.[citation needed] It is also the primary oxidizer for Russia's Proton rocket.

When used as a propellant, dinitrogen tetroxide is usually referred to simply as 'Nitrogen Tetroxide' and the abbreviation 'NTO' is extensively used. Additionally, NTO is often used with the addition of a small percentage of nitric oxide, which inhibits stress-corrosion cracking of titanium alloys, and in this form, propellant-grade NTO is referred to as "Mixed Oxides of Nitrogen" or "MON". Most spacecraft now use MON instead of NTO; for example, the Space Shuttle reaction control system used MON3 (NTO containing 3wt%NO).[6]
edit on 9 6 2016 by Naturallywired because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
143
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join