It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

UFO Destroyed the Falcon-9 Rocket /SpaceX/Facebook & Israeli Aerospace Industries

page: 26
144
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 10:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Naturallywired

You don't care that the satellite carried half a ton of highly volatile fuel?
So Ronnies "Star wars" exists?
Weapons in space are prohibited are they not?




posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Naturallywired
Space base weapons are prohibited, yes.
Was the shuttle a weapon? Is the Iss? Is your car? You have a fuel tank full of explosive material!
www.braeunig.us...


edit on 9/5/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 10:15 PM
link   
Man is this guy just stalking these threads 24/7? 43 thousand post's and he hasn't gone up for air all day

Been a while since I was active on forums. Forgot what it was like dealing with these weirdos.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: westernstar22

It's a long weekend.
Dude.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 10:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: westernstar22
Man is this guy just stalking these threads 24/7? 43 thousand post's and he hasn't gone up for air all day

Been a while since I was active on forums. Forgot what it was like dealing with these weirdos.
lol too much buckaroo banzai will do that to ya.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 10:52 PM
link   
How did this thread get to be so complicated over the weekend? It's obvious before reaching the end of page #1 that a UFO zipped behind/over the rocket, just before the explosion started.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 10:56 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust




How did this thread get to be so complicated over the weekend?

Because, it's hardly obvious before reaching the end of page #1 that a UFO zipped behind/over the rocket. Unless of course, you show me three consecutive frames?

1) object to the right of a tower
2) object not visible
3) object to the left of a tower

That would be interesting.
edit on 9/5/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)


(post by Naturallywired removed for a manners violation)

posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 11:41 PM
link   
disregard
edit on 5-9-2016 by all2human because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 11:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Naturallywired

Looks like The explosion took place at the second stage fuel cells for the Rl10a centaur engine causing the payload and centaur to collapse onto the larger first stage cells resulting in the second explosion.



edit on 5-9-2016 by all2human because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 11:55 PM
link   
Folks seriously watch this video.
There are way too many explosions in this that this was what they claim this to be?
And also from this video the "UFO" is different.




posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 11:56 PM
link   
Anyone find any answers as to why they would run the tests with the 100 million dollar payload onboard?



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 11:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: all2human
a reply to: Naturallywired

Looks like The explosion took place at the second stage fuel cells, causing the payload to collapse onto the first stage cells.
its a two stage rocket so yes, there is fuel near the nose cone

I am talking about when the nosecone hit's the ground. And all the explosions when it did and moments after it did.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 11:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Naturallywired

I agree with the others posting. It's a rocket blowing up due to a malfunction.

As for you "multiple explosions", that happens when something explodes from the top down.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 11:58 PM
link   
a reply to: westernstar22

Because that's what they do, just before an actual launch. Check the systems.
This one went fine.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 12:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: westernstar22
Anyone find any answers as to why they would run the tests with the 100 million dollar payload onboard?

Yes, because the billion dollar payload would have been a bigger loss.



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 12:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Naturallywired

I agree with the others posting. It's a rocket blowing up due to a malfunction.

As for you "multiple explosions", that happens when something explodes from the top down.
Apparently you did not watch my video all the way through? NEXT!



posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 12:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Naturallywired

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Naturallywired

I agree with the others posting. It's a rocket blowing up due to a malfunction.

As for you "multiple explosions", that happens when something explodes from the top down.
Apparently you did not watch my video all the way through? NEXT!

Apparently you don't know anything about rockets.


(post by Naturallywired removed for a manners violation)

posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 12:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust




How did this thread get to be so complicated over the weekend?

Because, it's hardly obvious before reaching the end of page #1 that a UFO zipped behind/over the rocket. Unless of course, you show me three consecutive frames?

1) object to the right of a tower
2) object not visible
3) object to the left of a tower

That would be interesting.


Yeah...it's too bad #2 didn't happen. Damn thing flew too high for an occlusion.




top topics



 
144
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join