It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

UFO Destroyed the Falcon-9 Rocket /SpaceX/Facebook & Israeli Aerospace Industries

page: 22
144
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   
a reply to: [post=21207758]lakenheath24[/t]

Who is who? I meant your cousin that you mentioned. And i was just noticeing the topic is bring some quiet members out of the woodwork is all. Unless multiple account users. Idk...




posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: westernstar22

Bunch of "drones" flying around. Before and after.
www.youtube.com...


Yessss...swirling, dipping around like bugs and birds do.

And then suddenly Robo-Bird 5000 comes into the screen in a perfectly straight trajectory, passing behind the towers looking nothing like the other birds and bugs which provide a very nice point of reference for what real birds and bugs look like.

there are plenty of videos to demonstrate this posted throughout the thread



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:27 PM
link   

edit on 5-9-2016 by westernstar22 because: doublepost



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Yeah. I didn't even think they could make it that far from maine. Figured they use a carrier



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: westernstar22

How do you know it passed behind the towers?

Can you show me three consecutive frames?

1) object to the right of a tower
2) object not visible
3) object to the left of a tower

That would be interesting.

It actually looks pretty much the same as all the other "drones."

edit on 9/5/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

And thus the circle begins again

Covered earlier. Looooots of people do not agree with your bird assessment and for good reason.

A lot of people are also going to find the slowed down footage of the explosion interesting, despite your odd attempts at killing everyone's curiosity in it with strange mundane explanations that everyone has already considered.
www.youtube.com...
edit on 5-9-2016 by westernstar22 because: link



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:36 PM
link   
a reply to: westernstar22
So, no evidence that anything went behind the towers?



Looooots of people do not agree with your bird assessment and for good reason.

Because they don't understand how cameras and video work?


Loooots of people think man never walked on the Moon.

edit on 9/5/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: lakenheath24
a reply to: westernstar22


*Breathes deeply*
No offense, but is it so hard to understand that if you watch the original video, there are no frames of the fireball starting. It was one frame showing the rocket and the next frame shows the fireball already there, growing bigger in the other frames.

All the other pictures in between the original frames were computer generated and do not represent what happened in the slow motion video posted..

Any discussion if the error is replicateable is moot.


edit on 5-9-2016 by verschickter because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-9-2016 by verschickter because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Corruptedstructure

Check your messages to keep from going more off topic.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:40 PM
link   
a reply to: verschickter

But earlier you claimed that the effect was a very commonly seen visual artifact?

Now it's edited in by someone after the fact.

As stated earlier youtube was flooded with videos of this event immediately after it happened. Which video are you using to analyze? Do you know where it originated?



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Corruptedstructure

Nah, just me. This is actually keeping me from my homework! (50yrs old and in college!) I just find the subject fascinating. Watching the vid in real time it looks as though an orb slams into the rocket. Realistically, I am betting on the fuel interface. As an aside, I am interested to see how the $50 million bill gets paid out.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   
a reply to: westernstar22




Now it's edited in by someone after the fact.

That is not what he said. It was explained earlier. Maybe you missed it.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:44 PM
link   


But earlier you claimed that the effect was a very commonly seen visual artifact?

You are a liar and not really good at it. Stop making up nonsense. If you fail to understand what they did to the video to get it slow motion, it´s your problem but stup making up stuff as you wish, it´s getting really annoying now!!



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:46 PM
link   
Remember, this isnt you vs me. It's the video vs everyone else trying to figure out what the # is going on.

I am sorry that I am annoying you with my questions but they still remain unanswered by you and your little friend here.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: verschickter

I said I get your algorithm input. Your argument is with western. Silly back and forths that don't advance the OP don't interest me.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: westernstar22
It´s logic thinking vs ignorance.
Ask you question again, Page is not my "friend", he´s a known member and what he writes is usually straight up.
edit on 5-9-2016 by verschickter because: added the "is"



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:49 PM
link   
The 3rd day. Eerie silence from SpaceX



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

And just how fast are they supposed to have this figured out? An hour? Two?



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: westernstar22

In this after effects tutorial, learn how to slow down your footage using the timewarp effect in After Effects. Timewarp is an alternative to Twixtor (which is a great plugin that helps slow down footage). You can slow down 24, 30, 60 fps without much distortion. But you can see that since the hummingbird's wings are so fast - it does get distorted using the Pixel Motion setting. I changed that to Frame Mix to get a better-looking video.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 02:53 PM
link   
Do they typically have video of tests like this? Or is a camera just constantly running. Thats the only other thing i was wondering




top topics



 
144
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join