It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

UFO Destroyed the Falcon-9 Rocket /SpaceX/Facebook & Israeli Aerospace Industries

page: 10
144
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 03:35 AM
link   
Yah, blurd. Maybe birds are tired of rockets messing up the atmosphere.

Screen capture I made of hummingbird in flight:



From this video:

Not saying its a humming bird in the OP, but it 'looks like' a bird, nonetheless.




posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 03:36 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Blurd.
The correct terminology is "blurd".
Or maybe a blug.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 03:50 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

&

a reply to: Phage

Just single picture, it could be a blurd. With speed, no never.

The blug, maybe I find it unlikely, because I can clearly see how the object goes behind the tower, slow motion on a big screen. But if that is some optical problem, maybe you can explain?



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 03:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kalixi
a reply to: Peeple

Zuckerberg is a Jew married to a Chinese woman - not a big stretch to think they were in cahoots with Isreal and China


Fckn traitors.

I'm sure there are many elite rich scumbags who are perfectly fine with siding with other countries and watching america fall apart and it's people suffer.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 03:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple




But if that is some optical problem, maybe you can explain?

Can you show me a frame where the object is in front of a tower?



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 03:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

No. That's the whole point, it is behind the towers.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 03:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: intrptr

Blurd.
The correct terminology is "blurd".
Or maybe a blog.


Don't forget Blets...


Whats a blog, blurry frog?



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

In which frame?
#1?
#2?
#3?
#4?
#5?



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

There's no way to be certain.

It's no blurd if it's behind the towers.

Probably a bird if it's in front of the towers.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Phage

No. That's the whole point, it is behind the towers.


Apparently. Or maybe the camera software can't distinguish between the fast moving object and the towers so omits it for the short duration it passes in front of them. Hi contrast against sky background, no problem.

Thats more likely. Damn the digitalis. Old film cameras would be 'augmentable'.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Imagine me raising my eyebrow and shrugging. What?



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple
There are five frames presented in the OP. Numbered and presumably sequential. None of them show the object in front of, or behind the towers.

You have claimed that the object is behind the towers. Why? Can you present an intermediary frame in which the object is not visible (behind of, or in front of a tower)? If not, one can only assume that you are assuming the object passed behind the towers.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

We already had that discussion, the picture is in the OP.

I am a bit disappointed, read the thread.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

It looks more birdish if you watch it HD full-screen at .25 speed. I count 10 frames with the object moving from right to the point slightly left of the falcon's nose.

There's a change in shape on frames 6 and 7. The spherical shape becomes ovoid with the pointed end downwards. These are likely to be wings.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple




We already had that discussion, the picture is in the OP.

Which frame?
#1?
#2?
#3?
#4?
#5?

In which one is the object behind a tower?



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage


originally posted by: Zarniwoop
It looks much less UFO-ish when you look at the zoomed screenshot from the original video.





Upper 3 to the left.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:14 AM
link   
regardless of who or what destroyed that rocket maybe just maybe it was to stop free internet , just think how many internet providers would be affected or out of business because of that satellite giving free internet to the world. it doesn't seem to be that far off of a reason to destroy the rocket TPTB surely have technology that we are not aware of and maybe have a deal with the ET's . just a thought .



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:18 AM
link   
a reply to: bobw927

The satellite would not have provided "free internet to the world."
en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 04:31 AM
link   
Seriously Take 2mins out to watch the WHOLE video.
I make it at least 4 other flashes exactly the same as this in the whole video.
I put this down to out of focus flies or birds in the area.
This filmed at 60fps.
The explosion clearly comes from the stage 2 fuel line!!! Look at the lens Glair on the first frame of the explosion and draw two lines to triangulate the source of the explosion....



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 05:47 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

hehe....



new topics

top topics



 
144
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join