It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: imsoconfused
a reply to: FamCore
They should have settled. The judge basically begged them to settle. He knew what would happen if they didn't.
Honestly I dont think its the theaters fault some crazy guy decided to go on a shooting spree.
Basically some of the survivors filed a federal law suit hoping that it would require theaters to increase safety measures to prevent things like this from happening in the future
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
Sad thing is, though, if I ever found myself in the unlikely scenario where I had to use my weapon in self-defense and stopped something, I'd probably go to jail for having ignored the sticker on the door.
The little guy gets screwed again
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
I wonder if they would try and slap a trespassing charge or something, in the hypothetical I mentioned.
Regardless, we both know that charges need not be something that would stick in order to be initially charged. In any event, I'm sure that I would have a legal headache--to what extend, I have no idea.
I do not think you can be hit with criminal charges by ignoring a private business's no firearms policy.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Place of business bans customers from carrying guns.
Place of business provides no security measures for people who aren't allowed guns.
Place of business then doesn't stop bad guy from bringing in gun.
Bad guy shoots everyone in place of business.
I'd say the business is at LEAST partially responsible.