"Alt-Right": A Movement? An Ideology? An Ethnicity? WHAT is it?

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Youtube (its artificial intelligence actually) pulled it because its loaded with video & audio content from the film saga STAR WARS, and that fact is entirely off topic in every way imaginable. Now whose the "troll"?

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

You forgot in list Glenn Beck

No, I didn't. Read it again.
I did not leave out Beck.


I didn't mention Hannity, O'Reilly, Coulter, or any of those idiots because typing any more of their names would have made me gag. ALL OF THEM are alt-right. I just didn't think you'd need a complete roll-call of the right-wing hysterics we all know about.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: kruphix

Read my thread title. I asked very clearly is it a movement, an ideology, etc. Most my every post herein has been centered around that. If you can't understand that then wow.

This thread isn't about SJW's.

So an ideology is a "social group category"?

It's hard to understand you when you don't use words in the same way the rest of us do.

But if we are limited to answering with "A Movement? An Ideology? An Ethnicity?", then I'd say it is a movement of people that share certain ideologies. Those ideologies being, white supremacy, white nationalism, anti-feminist, anti-minorities, and trolling.

I love how you are dodging the SJW question.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

YOU BROUGHT UP YOUR STUPID FAIL OF A FILM, dude.

You brought it up and provided a link for it as your 'ammo.' Now it's off topic?

SEE HOW YOU ARE?!!!!

Yeah, you plagiarized Star Wars, and named Ron Paul without his consent, and went on a rampage similar to the body of work you produce right here.

YOU (this is the general you, a la Jeff Foxworthy) might be alt-right if:

You are obtuse, combative, oppositional, and unable to have coherent discourse ---- disrespectful of everyone and everything that doesn't look like you; if you are not well educated or articulate; if you don't know how to do proper research and have correpondences where you ask for info and then accept the info; if you think you are funny or clever when you're not; if you snicker when you make posts and threads.....; if you thrive on being belligerent and noisome while also not contributing anything of value to others;

if this speaks to your sensibilities:


or this:


IF A PERSON is any of those things, but especially if they are consistently all of those things, they are alt-right.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

You forgot in list Glenn Beck

No, I didn't. Read it again.
I did not leave out Beck.


I didn't mention Hannity, O'Reilly, Coulter, or any of those idiots because typing any more of their names would have made me gag. ALL OF THEM are alt-right. I just didn't think you'd need a complete roll-call of the right-wing hysterics we all know about.

Yeah, I noticed the Beck portion after.

Okay, so all republicans / conservatives ARE "Alt-Right" as well. Along with the rest you've listed, and your complete refusal to answer the punchline (see thread title), as well as obvious deliberate attempts to derail the thread (and scores of the same of all of the above from your counter-parts), and name calling... THANK YOU!!!!

You've proven this "Alt-Right" Media/Hitlery DEMONIZATION campaign really is just a Label & Smear Campaign (L&SC) against anti-PC / anti-Hillary / etc types.

Here it is again for everyone's viewing: NEOCONWARS by IIB.

Because ignorance is bliss.
Film.
Fail.

NEOCON WARS (2008) Starring Ron Paul
by IIB Films

Published January 21, 2008
Usage Public Domain Mark 1.0
Topics iraq, iran, war on terror, bush, ron paul, rand paul, parody, satire, educational, war, terrorism


This satirical educational parody is perhaps the most important film of 2008, as it's the ultimate snapshot into the insanity of the masses in the over-riding era of that year. This was released for that years election cycle but was quickly banned by Youtube/Google Video, so not many souls have ever seen it. This is the original version, which was a rushed release. It was only the 2nd render of the piece as a whole. It was made with Sony Vegas in about 7 months total. It's in great form, but some more time could have been spent on audio leveling.

Full of yourself much?

"the most important film of the year" by IgnoranceIsBliss. Obama won, dude. "Starring" Ron Paul?

No wonder it got yanked. You are alt-right. Not to be confused with "all right".

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

What is the freaking "punch-line" you keep yammering about?

You asked "what is alt-right"? You have been answered.

dbl post

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

You're oblivious to how bad you're making yourself look today, and it's Hillarious.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

No, I'm afraid it is you who seems all over the place.

"Alt-right" is 'a demographic.' There - you happy?
And I'm not a Hillary supporter. But, of course, you don't know that because you don't pay attention to anyone except the alt-right trolls who you rather resemble.

Obtuseness is one of their best things.

As for the "name calling" ---- you put this stupid thread in the Mud-Pit. Gloves off, man.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

You're oblivious to how bad you're making yourself look today, and it's Hillarious.

That's hilarious.

There is only one person in this thread making themselves look bad...and it isn't BuzzyWigs.

Okay, since the 2 of you apparently cant read AND understand English...

Thread title:

"Alt-Right": A Movement? An Ideology? An Ethnicity? WHAT is it?

Okay so it was LATE, beers involved, was a bit sloppy in the OP, but do note I didn't ask WHO A-R is, I asked WHAT A-R is. Following social construct category type definitions, NOT the who's who of people to lump into it. (I.E. the QUESTION was it a "Movement", or an "Ideology", etc):

So please, somebody, articulate for me & everyone (via definitions) how do we even classify what this "Alt-Right" thing even is (i.e. a movement, or political party, or ideology, or etc).

Post #2 (meaning posts by me):

Under this notion, then the definition is its an anti-PC "ideology"? Does that include anybody anti-PC??? If so I have a hard time categorizing it as an proper Ideology,therefore we're still lost under my impression of this whole affair...

Post #3:

I'll let you clarify on this, but please do be sure and apply a proper category definition to the notion you present... pretty please!

Post #5:

Okay. You could instead of making th entire the discussion about the miscommunication itself, make it about finally understanding your categorization I'm begging for (if you have one).

Post #6:

Oh, hey, BW, you forgot to add your category definition, where my underlying argument herein is that if you can't then it ins't even a real 'thing'.

Post #8:

Um, no category? ... Are you capable of actually categorizing what this "thing" is and is not? Or is the subject, Hillary, and your looooong post, just about label attaching and smearing the opposition to PC / Hillary????

Post #:13

So you still can't place this "Alt-Right" thing into a proper social group category (see my thread title if you're confused), other than to call it a "category"?

Post #16:

I asked what social group category to place this in, which in multiple posts now I've begged you for and you can't / won't do it (see thread title if you still dont get it).

Post #18:

Anyways, can you categorize what this alt-right thing is (see thread title)?? The more, the longer the posts you guys make while dodging the issue the more it proves this whole thing really is just a Label & Smear Campaign (L&SC) against anti-PC / anti-Hillary types.

Do you still not get the topic?

originally posted by: kruphix
There is only one person in this thread making themselves look bad...and it isn't BuzzyWigs.

There are 2 actually, which doesn't include IIB.

Its a movement full of people who cry about jesus and santa claus being white people.

Its also the same people who tell us hitler was a socialist, a bunch of fun loving cry babies.

This post was payed by the clinton foundation.

And the canadian communist party.

Also brought to you by safeplaces.com

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

... and the letters S, J and W.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
Yeah, you plagiarized Star Wars, and named Ron Paul without his consent, and went on a rampage similar to the body of work you produce right here.

It was a political satire documentary.

I was just illustrating who the Neocon's are + how I used to 'fight' side by side with liberals against them, a fact which is entirely lost on the modern 'progressives' because of intolerance of my anti-PC stance.

You should actually watch it. I dare you to and have the balls and come and tell me it sucked, that it wasn't IMPORTANT. You do that and come tell me a film that's more important then or now. PLEASE. I want to see it!
BTW: It was made specifically for the '08 Republican primaries, to punk the Neocon's and how insane they were, in favor of Ron Paul of course.

You're decorum in here is the worst I can remember of just about anybody at any point in the entire ATS site all summer.

It wasn't my goal here to TRIGGER you, but good thing I picked the Mud Pit for this one since are guys are.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
YOU (this is the general you, a la Jeff Foxworthy) might be alt-right if:

You are obtuse, combative, oppositional, and unable to have coherent discourse ---- disrespectful of everyone and everything that doesn't look like you; if you are not well educated or articulate; if you don't know how to do proper research and have correpondences where you ask for info and then accept the info; if you think you are funny or clever when you're not; if you snicker when you make posts and threads.....; if you thrive on being belligerent and noisome while also not contributing anything of value to others;

if this speaks to your sensibilities:

or this:

IF A PERSON is any of those things, but especially if they are consistently all of those things, they are alt-right.

Alright. So again you have exclaimed that people you dont like / oppose your views are to be labelled "alt-right".

Good show jolly ol' chap!

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

hillaryclinton.com has defined it as

The alternative right, commonly known as the alt-right, is defined by the Southern Poverty Law Center (an organization that tracks hate groups), as a “set of far-right ideologies at the core of which is a belief that ‘white identity’ is under attack by multicultural forces using ‘political correctness’ and ‘social justice’ to undermine white people and ‘their’ civilization.”

In other words: This is not conservatism or the Republican Party. This is a movement that fosters anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, anti-multiculturalism, and anti-women rhetoric. This is a white supremacist movement, and one that Trump has not only refused to denounce—it’s one he actively courts.

But it's counter part AKA "black lives matter" is just fine to them I Would bet

Most Black Americans do NOT subscribe to that Black Lives Matter joke of a "movement". Trust me on that one.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

oh ffs. It is a demographic. Just like any other demographic.

Category: white people

Attribute: difficult


Physical characteristics: white males

If the subject is all of the above,
AND exhibits the following:

Racist
Nationalist
Miosynist
Anti-social
Violent
Obnoxious
Poor listening skills
Limited education and/or personality disorder
and
Persistent Online Presence

In a manner consistently: disagreeable

That's who "alt-right" is.

It is a subspecie of American males. mammal, primate, sapiens

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Alright. So again you have exclaimed that people you dont like / oppose your views are to be labelled "alt-right".

Good show jolly ol' chap!

OMG. So, your whole thing here was to troll and phish until you got someone to describe the people who are called "alt-right" so you could then point out that we disagree with them. Derp. We obviously disagree with them and don't like their ideas. That doesn't change who they are.


And I'm not a chap.