It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

"Alt-Right": A Movement? An Ideology? An Ethnicity? WHAT is it?

page: 19
14
<< 16  17  18    20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 05:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74
a reply to: DJW001

I wonder for how many pages the two of you will push on in here refusing to. You just keep proving my point and its delicious.





posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 05:32 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

You're not the boss of me and I don't care if saying so boosts you to a million pages.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 05:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Kali74
a reply to: DJW001

I wonder for how many pages the two of you will push on in here refusing to. You just keep proving my point and its delicious.



Actually, I did try the first link,but not because you told me to. Your behavior is a perfect example of the authoritarian personality type. You are bullying, using ridicule, and refusing to acknowledge that anyone but yourself is capable of having a valid point of view.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 06:01 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

An anti-free speech liberal trying to label a libertarian an authoritarian (and say it as if to them its a bad thing). It doesn't get any better than that. Studies shows liberals are even more authoritarian than conservatives.

Just because I have a talent for 'nailing people to the wall' in debates, and rubbing such people wrong, even if I am or am not a jerk in any given exchange doesn't mean I'm an authoritarian.
edit on 5-9-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 06:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

This alt-right thing to me is just another label to place and then to demonize. Doesn't this fall in line with the Saul Alinsky tactics?



Kind of. The Left needs a boogeyman to scare people. Creating a new online community is even easier than tarring/feathering conservatives and Republicans. Poeple can know conservative and Republicans. Not knowing who is an alt-right makes them even more inhuman and easy to attack and/or dismiss.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 06:45 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Grandiosity complex much?



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 06:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Do you like Breitbart?



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Do you like Breitbart?


Breitbart is sooo to die for.




posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 07:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Do you like Breitbart?


The chocolate or the coffee?



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 07:22 PM
link   
Anyway kiddos...

Steve Bannon, Trump campaign CEO and executive chairman of Breitbart News, host of Breitbart News on Sirius said in an interview with Mother Jones that Breitbart News is the platform for the alt-right.


"We're the platform for the alt-right," Bannon told me proudly when I interviewed him at the Republican National Convention (RNC) in July. Though disavowed by every other major conservative news outlet, the alt-right has been Bannon's target audience ever since he took over Breitbart News from its late founder, Andrew Breitbart, four years ago. Under Bannon's leadership, the site has plunged into the fever swamps of conservatism, cheering white nationalist groups as an "eclectic mix of renegades," accusing President Barack Obama of importing "more hating Muslims," and waging an incessant war against the purveyors of "political correctness."



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss


An anti-free speech liberal trying to label a libertarian an authoritarian (and say it as if to them its a bad thing). It doesn't get any better than that. Studies shows liberals are even more authoritarian than conservatives.


I am absolutely in favor of free speech. It allows people to expose themselves, as you have.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 08:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Yay for more slices of pie!



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 08:34 PM
link   
Wasn't it Trump that wanted to silence those that spoke bad of him. Can't really be arse'd to go source it.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 08:42 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Right. As long as an outlet isn't "too" critical of BLM, then free speech good. Otherwise, censor 'em ala non grata!

We already covered this, your thread, in this thread. It's on record here. Don't pretend. We all saw it. That was the tone of your entire thread that was full of responses critical of your premise and only once in there did you even pretend you weren't talking about censoring them. I think across what 3, 4 pages in this thread you insisted we all review it again.

In case you forgot already scroll back several pages in here and you can review it all.

Next subject!



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 08:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Do you like Breitbart?


The man or the website?



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 09:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: BubbaJoe
Wasn't it Trump that wanted to silence those that spoke bad of him. Can't really be arse'd to go source it.


No, what he said was he would open up libel laws so that newspapers could be more easily sued for purposefully false hit pieces.

He also mentioned "negative and horrible" but I don't think those would hold up in court.

Example: Daily Mail said Melania Trump could have been an escort, Melania threatens to sue for 150 million, Daily Mail retracts. If DM had a solid case they would not have folded. Case closed.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 09:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Teikiatsu

See my previous post.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 09:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: BubbaJoe
Wasn't it Trump that wanted to silence those that spoke bad of him. Can't really be arse'd to go source it.


No, what he said was he would open up libel laws so that newspapers could be more easily sued for purposefully false hit pieces.

He also mentioned "negative and horrible" but I don't think those would hold up in court.

Example: Daily Mail said Melania Trump could have been an escort, Melania threatens to sue for 150 million, Daily Mail retracts. If DM had a solid case they would not have folded. Case closed.


No not case closed, Trump is accused of being a child rapist, no suit for that.



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 09:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Teikiatsu

See my previous post.


See my respect for Mother Jones:

Notice the lack of anything after the colon? Yep.
edit on 5-9-2016 by Teikiatsu because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 09:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: DJW001

Right. As long as an outlet isn't "too" critical of BLM, then free speech good. Otherwise, censor 'em ala non grata!

We already covered this, your thread, in this thread. It's on record here. Don't pretend. We all saw it. That was the tone of your entire thread that was full of responses critical of your premise and only once in there did you even pretend you weren't talking about censoring them. I think across what 3, 4 pages in this thread you insisted we all review it again.

In case you forgot already scroll back several pages in here and you can review it all.

Next subject!


I have read alot of your posts across several threads, and you are nothing but a shill for the Trump. Mysoginistic/ Racisct asshat that he is. You have been disingenious in many threads, and yeah I think you are pretty much a troll.




top topics



 
14
<< 16  17  18    20 >>

log in

join