"Alt-Right": A Movement? An Ideology? An Ethnicity? WHAT is it?

There should not be a label for this "movement" because the beliefs of the true supporters will change if the world changes. To put it as simply as possible. Racism, patriotism, nationalism, and ethnocentrism exist... These are all outdated human constructs that need to go before we can all get along and have peace. I believe that to be true and that does not make me a racist or a bigot. The fact that we can't say something like that because of political correctness is how it gets tied in as an enemy of the movement. Everyone should be investigating the truth with their own eyes and ears. Anyone that tries to stop you from doing that is a sheep. Yes a racist might think they support the "alt-right" but they don't really know the end game. We need them included. We will fix everything from the inside.

If you believe in free expression and are against censorship, you're an alt-right.

a reply to: twigbaby

I think it boils down to nationalism vs globalism.

Almost every descriptive uses nationalism as a slur.

Globalism is the real danger, imho.

Mr. Jarod Taylor with American Renaissance explains the alt-right very well.

Here's a link to a quick video of him explaining it all...
www.amren.com...

Edit: This site is chock full of truth if you like that sort of thing!

originally posted by: DBCowboy
If you believe in free expression and are against censorship, you're an alt-right.

Right there you go.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: CADpro

Already had it posted, and the same site online also links to posts and further explain the movement itself doesn't really have a good definition of what alt-right actually is.

It is a floating label without a real definition.

Also true.



I think above all, it's NOT some kind of Nazi racist movement. Anyone who beleives that crap probably already thinks everyone they disagree with is a witch....errr racist.

a reply to: CADpro

Already had it posted, and the same site online also links to posts and further explain the movement itself doesn't really have a good definition of what alt-right actually is.

It is a floating label without a real definition.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Globalism will not work because humanity isn't ready for it. That is all. One world government will happen someday but the people that push the globalist agenda at this time just have no understanding of the world and should focus on something else that is feasible. We must eliminate all prejudice before anything good like that is going to happen. It will probably be another 2 thousand years.

I think most of the "Alt-Right" definitions are coming from Left-Wing/DNC/Clinton smear operatives.

They had to come up with a new "blame" scratching post.

a reply to: xuenchen

no. They are coming from Breitbart et al.

Nice try, though.
Holy crapoly, xuen! Really? Are you that desperate for someone to shore up your beliefs?

This entire thread has been about trying to prove, somehow, by weird, twisted osmosis, that the "alt-right" thing is fiction.

Well, it isn't.

It is you.
Rounded up and defined. Alt-right: the rabid right-wing hysterics.

You, the OP, and all the others who feign innocence.
Disgraceful examples of American adults.

a reply to: twigbaby

That I can understand and accept.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Rounded up and defined. Alt-right: the rabid right-wing hysterics.

Are special showers next? A culling maybe?

a reply to: twigbaby

There is no one pushing a "globalist agenda" except the fictitious 'boogey men' that you lie awake fretting about.

The NWO is what it is, right now. There is no sinister plot to cover up all the wrongs, or to kill all the witnesses, or to depopulate the entire world by 95%.

And if there was, well - you all would be on the list.
So - stick that in your back pocket.

a reply to: JinMI

Absurd tolling is absurd.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Your words, I'm just asking a question.

Redundancy is redundant.

a reply to: JinMI

No, you're not just "asking a question."

You are attempting to bait me.
So, that's a fail for you.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

LOL

look at wiki and see all the Left Wing "sources" and "references" listed.

a reply to: xuenchen

Dude. I posted Breitbart's own guy's "manifesto."

Deal with it.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: JinMI

No, you're not just "asking a question."

You are attempting to bait me.
So, that's a fail for you.

No need to bait my dear, you've posted as much elsewhere. I just think it odd the good folks of peace aim to destroy anything outside their box. It's resembles zeal almost extremism.

WOW the PROGS really are HANGING on to this one.
They've got to SHUT down these news sources, before Hillary collapses and they can't conjure a new incubus before the elections.

a reply to: cavtrooper7

Stop it, cav. Just stop it.
The "progs" are not Hillary supporters. In fact, on all of ATS, I'd say there are one or two Hillary supporters. So all of that insulting stuff doesn't even apply.

None of the no-Trump people on here actually want Hillary.
You all can keep thinking that - - but that doesn't make it true.