It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: coomba98
God has given us freewill
That means God has stepped back from His position as sovereign to allow us choice, anything short of that would make us robots
originally posted by: coomba98
So you believe because you want to? Not because of logic and evidence?
originally posted by: SpaceGoatFart
originally posted by: LittleByLittle
a reply to: SpaceGoatFart
Now days some religions wrongly make people believe walking is all there is and "running" is not possible.
I believe that's mainly your perception of them.
Religions don't teach. Men do. If someone is giving an interpretation of some sacred books, its still his own interpretation. Not the one of everyone reading that book. Even among something as hierarchic as the Catholic Church, there is no shortage of different opinions and contradictory teachings.
You problem is more with some people than with some religions.
originally posted by: luciferslight
Christians don't bow to the virgin Mary. They believe in the second coming of Christ. They believe in the rapture. They believe in love.
originally posted by: SpaceGoatFart
originally posted by: coomba98
So you believe because you want to? Not because of logic and evidence?
My beliefs are completely separate from the spiritual teachings I can learn from the Bible.
They are mainly based on personal experience assessed through the prism of logic. I certainly do not believe because some book supposedly tells me I should.
originally posted by: LittleByLittle
Ideas are written down and mean what they say.
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: markosity1973
originally posted by: coomba98
The bible reads like a historical account. Infers its a historical account.
Kinda like cherry picking. This is real and this a moral.
Coomba98
Not really.....
The Song of Songs is not an historical account. The story of Jonah and the whale serves more purpose as an allegory than an actual event.
So it is full of both parables and literal history. The tricky part for the uninitiated is deciphering correctly which is which.
How do you come by this opinion? Of being both parables and literal history?
How do you know whats what?
Coomba98
The way to tell parables apart from actual events in the Bible is that parables don't have names of people. Think the parable of the prodigal son. A real event/story with have people's names and places listed in the story.
Is this opinion or fact?
Coomba98
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: markosity1973
originally posted by: coomba98
The bible reads like a historical account. Infers its a historical account.
Kinda like cherry picking. This is real and this a moral.
Coomba98
Not really.....
The Song of Songs is not an historical account. The story of Jonah and the whale serves more purpose as an allegory than an actual event.
So it is full of both parables and literal history. The tricky part for the uninitiated is deciphering correctly which is which.
How do you come by this opinion? Of being both parables and literal history?
How do you know whats what?
Coomba98
The way to tell parables apart from actual events in the Bible is that parables don't have names of people. Think the parable of the prodigal son. A real event/story with have people's names and places listed in the story.
Is this opinion or fact?
Coomba98
In regards to the scriptures, it's a fact. Parables are impersonal, no names are given, it's an illustration.
originally posted by: coomba98
a reply to: markosity1973
So what makes you have faith?
Coomba98
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: markosity1973
originally posted by: coomba98
The bible reads like a historical account. Infers its a historical account.
Kinda like cherry picking. This is real and this a moral.
Coomba98
Not really.....
The Song of Songs is not an historical account. The story of Jonah and the whale serves more purpose as an allegory than an actual event.
So it is full of both parables and literal history. The tricky part for the uninitiated is deciphering correctly which is which.
How do you come by this opinion? Of being both parables and literal history?
How do you know whats what?
Coomba98
The way to tell parables apart from actual events in the Bible is that parables don't have names of people. Think the parable of the prodigal son. A real event/story with have people's names and places listed in the story.
Is this opinion or fact?
Coomba98
In regards to the scriptures, it's a fact. Parables are impersonal, no names are given, it's an illustration.
So what makes you believe parables are morals/ impersonal/illustration? And not fact?
Coomba98
originally posted by: SpaceGoatFart
originally posted by: coomba98
So what makes you believe parables are morals/ impersonal/illustration? And not fact?
Coomba98
What makes you think they could be fact?
You are correct, you do sound a bit pissy, strangely inquisitory and in need of a good dinner
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: SpaceGoatFart
originally posted by: coomba98
a reply to: SpaceGoatFart
Literally out loud or in their mind does not matter.
Not sure how to respond further as your response does not answer my quote you quoted.
If such things don't really matter, then it's not important to me to be able to determine what is parable and what is literal history.
I cannot tell because I wasn't there.
But it's not important to me if genesis is literal or not, since what matters with genesis is the spiritual message it teaches.
That answers your question.
So you believe because you want to? Not because of logic and evidence?
Coomba98
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: markosity1973
originally posted by: coomba98
The bible reads like a historical account. Infers its a historical account.
Kinda like cherry picking. This is real and this a moral.
Coomba98
Not really.....
The Song of Songs is not an historical account. The story of Jonah and the whale serves more purpose as an allegory than an actual event.
So it is full of both parables and literal history. The tricky part for the uninitiated is deciphering correctly which is which.
How do you come by this opinion? Of being both parables and literal history?
How do you know whats what?
Coomba98
The way to tell parables apart from actual events in the Bible is that parables don't have names of people. Think the parable of the prodigal son. A real event/story with have people's names and places listed in the story.
Is this opinion or fact?
Coomba98
In regards to the scriptures, it's a fact. Parables are impersonal, no names are given, it's an illustration.
So what makes you believe parables are morals/ impersonal/illustration? And not fact?
Coomba98
Why do you ask when you have no interest in the answer.
You are just asking to be difficult and arrogant
So you don't believe, won't believe but act like you know everything already
Why not just say you don't believe it, won't believe anything anyone says and just let it go
Really, is there an answer you wil accept, what's your point, why ask?
originally posted by: coomba98
a reply to: SpaceGoatFart
I was after elaboration. Not a statement.
Coomba98
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: coomba98
originally posted by: SpaceGoatFart
originally posted by: coomba98
a reply to: SpaceGoatFart
Literally out loud or in their mind does not matter.
Not sure how to respond further as your response does not answer my quote you quoted.
If such things don't really matter, then it's not important to me to be able to determine what is parable and what is literal history.
I cannot tell because I wasn't there.
But it's not important to me if genesis is literal or not, since what matters with genesis is the spiritual message it teaches.
That answers your question.
So you believe because you want to? Not because of logic and evidence?
Coomba98
Is that hard to believe, the bible even tells Christians to believe despite it being silly, have faith when faith has almost dried up
Clearly you are coming from a place of no knowledge asking questions that are answered time and time again
Christians believe because they want to, despite it being illogical
Evidence, well that is something else, you can't understand because, your lack of knowledge
Some of the most intelligent people accept Christ
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: coomba98
Think you missed a post earlier