It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: galien8
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: galien8
According to some scientists and esoteric societies only a world population of around 300 million people is stable and sustainable.
Show me one scientist who says such a thing. Just one.
As I said before I cannot give the name, but I can tell you exactly what he said: QUOTE ...due to more technology the energy demand per capita is in 50 to 100 years from now more than 10 times bigger than in the present time...so there is than only room for 300 million people on this planet... END QUOTE (so this increasing energy demand per capita, because of more and more technology, grows even faster then the overpopulation)
So why not stop the energy demand, wouldn't that be better than killing billions
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: galien8
It is still a genocide - a wholesale killing of people you deem unworthy of life. It doesn't matter what that reason is or even if you consider yourself potentially part of the population.
In your case, you are basically saying that almost all of humanity is unworthy of life.
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
Tell me, do you know what happens in a petri dish when Critical Mass is reached?
I'd be interested in which of the two primary results you found most interesting.
originally posted by: pl3bscheese
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
Tell me, do you know what happens in a petri dish when Critical Mass is reached?
I'd be interested in which of the two primary results you found most interesting.
Phase transition.
We grow up, else throw up.
originally posted by: galien8
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: galien8
It is still a genocide - a wholesale killing of people you deem unworthy of life. It doesn't matter what that reason is or even if you consider yourself potentially part of the population.
In your case, you are basically saying that almost all of humanity is unworthy of life.
OK but no one is despised, also they are not unworthy, they had bad luck in the lottery, nothing personal
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: galien8
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: galien8
It is still a genocide - a wholesale killing of people you deem unworthy of life. It doesn't matter what that reason is or even if you consider yourself potentially part of the population.
In your case, you are basically saying that almost all of humanity is unworthy of life.
OK but no one is despised, also they are not unworthy, they had bad luck in the lottery, nothing personal
No by the very definition of what you propose, you are labeling pretty all of humankind despised and unworthy.
It doesn't matter if you whittle the numbers down randomly. You think that's fair, but it's still monstrously unfair because it is you calling for the wholesale slaughter of the bulk of the human race as being unworthy to live.
In a way, the sheer randomness of your approach is even more terrifying because it's clear that you value individual life not at all. Not even your own.
An individual simply does not matter to you at all.
originally posted by: artistpoet
Overpopulation is a fallacy and those advocating it lack intelligence
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: galien8
300 million spread across the world could lead to technological stagnation. Would that be a bad thing? Guess it's personal opinion on that.
The bilderberg party always talks about overpopulation and the esoteric societies (societies like the Illuminati) too, I got that from the Georgia Guide Stones
originally posted by: artistpoet
You are a proponent of artificial depopulation and as such you are an enemy of Humanity
Be careful for what you wish for
Your idea is the product of a sick or deluded mind
The elite gets of course the non sterilizing vaccine, but the mentality of died love in the now infertile lower class, will cancer up in the elite class too. There will be no more love in the world, ragnarok You dumb Illuminati prick
originally posted by: galien8
a reply to: artistpoet
I know you do not reply, this is just a memorandum: I always say that the Decimate Lottery should only be done if there is a majority for it in an world referendum, for example organized by the United Nations. There is no other way of forcing it upon the world population, only if they agree themselves, however the 10% to be exterminated in each decimate round will revolt and perhaps change their mind, if they agreed in the first place, but then the authorities need to be harsh and resolute and still kill them all.
originally posted by: snowspirit
That's still a sick twisted concept. If there's a majority of the world in favour of a culling (killing), then let that majority keep it amongst themselves.
You say you love humanity so much that you want to kill off billions of people, that most likely don't want to die.
Maybe a better idea would be terraforming other planets. We will need people alive in order to get us more spaceworthy...
originally posted by: galien8
Is true! All present mayor world problems are in fact overpopulation problems:
-65 million people are refugees from areas where they are the overpopulation, no food, no safety, no work, no housing etc.
-Climate change and greenhouse effect, too many people are burning fossil fuels
-Food supply, large scale agriculture and livestock is exhausting the world in one gigantic last climax of productivity, after that there is no more large scale agriculture possible
-Empty oceans, no fish anymore, fish full of mercury
-Disappearing of wildlife and rain forests, deforestation
-Economic collapse
-Wars
-Pollution of air, water and land
etc. etc.
We are now more than 7 billion people, so about 7 billion people need to be exterminated
This can be done in 30 rounds of a decimate lottery in 120 years, where everybody has the same 90% of survival each round, so it does not matter if your the richest man in the world or the poorest, everybody equal in probability of surviving. Decimate means nothing more than kill 10% by (the rest) a 90% majority.
Here comes the conspiracy (the cabal) in play, we do Top Down approach, we start the decimate lottery with the Bilderberg party, from there the #bigbrotheriswatchingyou secret agencies and services (which in fact is a pan global conglomerate of MI5, MI6, CIA, KGB, NSA, BND, MOSSAD and what have ye) then the rich 1%, then the multinationals, then the politicians, then ... , down to the common people.
This is my conspiracy, I'm one of the liaisons of THE ARCHITECT of our Universe Simulation we call reality, we get our instructions in dream theme anagrams. This conspiracy is a so called "open conspiracy" everything public!!!
I'm willing to start the decimate lottery myself, to give a good example, if I survive, I have at least 4 years to live guaranteed, until the next lottery round, just like everyone else who participates, I do that only when at the same time all still living Bilderberg party members are doing this lottery simultaneously, could be in a TV show.
JOIN US. You can find the anagram manuals in my threads.
originally posted by: olbond
I think there should be other methods to solve the global problems you've mentioned here. This depopulation lottery isn't actually humane. I've just found a great stuff on the same issue on planetaryproject.com... website. These guys are trying to find really effective ways of tackling global problems. Sorry, mate!