It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lets make a conspiracy ourselves: Decimate Depopulation Lottery

page: 1
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 08:22 PM
link   
According to some scientists and esoteric societies only a world population of around 300 million people is stable and sustainable.

Is true! All present mayor world problems are in fact overpopulation problems:
-65 million people are refugees from areas where they are the overpopulation, no food, no safety, no work, no housing etc.
-Climate change and greenhouse effect, too many people are burning fossil fuels
-Food supply, large scale agriculture and livestock is exhausting the world in one gigantic last climax of productivity, after that there is no more large scale agriculture possible
-Empty oceans, no fish anymore, fish full of mercury
-Disappearing of wildlife and rain forests, deforestation
-Economic collapse
-Wars
-Pollution of air, water and land
etc. etc.

We are now more than 7 billion people, so about 7 billion people need to be exterminated

This can be done in 30 rounds of a decimate lottery in 120 years, where everybody has the same 90% of survival each round, so it does not matter if your the richest man in the world or the poorest, everybody equal in probability of surviving. Decimate means nothing more than kill 10% by (the rest) a 90% majority.

Here comes the conspiracy (the cabal) in play, we do Top Down approach, we start the decimate lottery with the Bilderberg party, from there the #bigbrotheriswatchingyou secret agencies and services (which in fact is a pan global conglomerate of MI5, MI6, CIA, KGB, NSA, BND, MOSSAD and what have ye) then the rich 1%, then the multinationals, then the politicians, then ... , down to the common people.

This is my conspiracy, I'm one of the liaisons of THE ARCHITECT of our Universe Simulation we call reality, we get our instructions in dream theme anagrams. This conspiracy is a so called "open conspiracy" everything public!!!

I'm willing to start the decimate lottery myself, to give a good example, if I survive, I have at least 4 years to live guaranteed, until the next lottery round, just like everyone else who participates, I do that only when at the same time all still living Bilderberg party members are doing this lottery simultaneously, could be in a TV show.

JOIN US. You can find the anagram manuals in my threads.
edit on 2016-8-29 by galien8 because: readability




posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 08:38 PM
link   
I think we start at the top 10% wealthy so they can redistribute the wealth to the poor
No Lotto, just euthanasia the rich people



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
I think we start at the top 10% wealthy so they can redistribute the wealth to the poor
No Lotto, just euthanasia the rich people




A kind of French Revolution?

French Revolution



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 09:05 PM
link   
a reply to: galien8

This sounds extremely f*cked up

I admit, many of them might be evil, but you are essentially advocating for the killing of a certain economic class of individuals? Just because they are rich it is justified? How would people react if someone said "let's just kill all the poor people?"



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 09:07 PM
link   
a reply to: FamCore

We had a taste of it when someone says, "Let's kill group X or group Y." No matter how pretty you dress up your system, it's still genocide.



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 09:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: galien8

This sounds extremely f*cked up

I admit, many of them might be evil, but you are essentially advocating for the killing of a certain economic class of individuals? Just because they are rich it is justified? How would people react if someone said "let's just kill all the poor people?"



No I'm not saying that (I only found Raggedyman's comment funny) I'm saying in the decimate lottery everybody is equal, has an equal probability to survive the lottery. OK I said Top Down approach that could be perverted, not by me, to a kind of French Revolution and than stops, but the rich and the famous must set a good example (however will of course not be voluntary, they maybe agree to be in the 90% survivors but they will revolt when they are in the 10% to be decimated) Other people need to work out the details



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 09:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: FamCore

We had a taste of it when someone says, "Let's kill group X or group Y." No matter how pretty you dress up your system, it's still genocide.


Genocide is on ethnicity, in my decimate lottery everybody has the same probability of survival, rich / poor, powerful / weak, black / white, Christian / Hindu / Muslim / Buddhist does not matter all equal!!!



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 09:31 PM
link   
a reply to: galien8

ok but in that scenario the rich/1% would also be able to buy their way out of it, like they do every other "official" thing in the "real" world, so the odds would still be stacked against the "regulars", the way I see it anyway



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 09:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: galien8
According to some scientists and esoteric societies only a world population of around 300 million people is stable and sustainable.

Show me one scientist who says such a thing. Just one.
edit on 8/29/2016 by AdmireTheDistance because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: galien8

ok but in that scenario the rich/1% would also be able to buy their way out of it, like they do every other "official" thing in the "real" world, so the odds would still be stacked against the "regulars", the way I see it anyway


Your quite right, that is a problem, would need a binding world referendum, so there is a mandate for the Decimate Depopulation Lottery scenario



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 09:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: galien8
According to some scientists and esoteric societies only a world population of around 300 million people is stable and sustainable.

Show me one scientist who says such a thing. Just one.


OK! We discussed the calculations of ONE scientist in a group of maybe 5 scientists, the one that made the calculations, this was in the mid nineties, did not agree for a personal communication reference, I was a Science Journalist than. I made his remarks as anonymous comment in an article about biogas. I still respect his request not to be mentioned
edit on 2016-8-29 by galien8 because: readability



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: galien8


Other people need to work out the details


How about just no.



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: snowspirit
a reply to: galien8


Other people need to work out the details


How about just no.


...the devil is in the details...



posted on Aug, 30 2016 @ 12:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: galien8
According to some scientists and esoteric societies only a world population of around 300 million people is stable and sustainable.

Show me one scientist who says such a thing. Just one.


As I said before I cannot give the name, but I can tell you exactly what he said: QUOTE ...due to more technology the energy demand per capita is in 50 to 100 years from now more than 10 times bigger than in the present time...so there is than only room for 300 million people on this planet... END QUOTE (so this increasing energy demand per capita, because of more and more technology, grows even faster then the overpopulation)
edit on 2016-8-30 by galien8 because: readability

edit on 2016-8-30 by galien8 because: extra info



posted on Sep, 2 2016 @ 08:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
I think we start at the top 10% wealthy so they can redistribute the wealth to the poor
No Lotto, just euthanasia the rich people


...there could be razzias involved, concentration camps, destruction sites, gassing, cremation ovens, but we all know whats that like...

edit on 2016-9-2 by galien8 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 12:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: galien8

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: galien8
According to some scientists and esoteric societies only a world population of around 300 million people is stable and sustainable.

Show me one scientist who says such a thing. Just one.


As I said before I cannot give the name, but I can tell you exactly what he said: QUOTE ...due to more technology the energy demand per capita is in 50 to 100 years from now more than 10 times bigger than in the present time...so there is than only room for 300 million people on this planet... END QUOTE (so this increasing energy demand per capita, because of more and more technology, grows even faster then the overpopulation)


So why not stop the energy demand, wouldn't that be better than killing billions



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 12:14 AM
link   
a reply to: galien8

It is still a genocide - a wholesale killing of people you deem unworthy of life. It doesn't matter what that reason is or even if you consider yourself potentially part of the population.

In your case, you are basically saying that almost all of humanity is unworthy of life.
edit on 3-9-2016 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 12:22 AM
link   
Tell me, do you know what happens in a petri dish when Critical Mass is reached?

I'd be interested in which of the two primary results you found most interesting.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 12:47 AM
link   
Carrying capacity is dynamic. We have increased carrying capacity generation after generation for some time now beyond all "odds" or calculations based on starting with core assumptions and extrapolating future probability from past events.

The thing is that this "carrying capacity" is measured a bit short-sighted, though I would have to say the same of most doom-porn I've heard in my life. We are rapidly changing the face of the earth, the ocean life, and the atmosphere around us, but the world is much less threatening, or rather we are to ourselves, now than most of our points in history.

We have many problems, but energy, or basic needs being met are not one of them. There may come a point in the mid-term where agricultural problems arise, but honestly this is to be expected. We've had famine throughout our history periodically. I think we view doom from a tainted lens of abundant prosperity. It would be much weirder if things stayed very stable for century after century. I would fear that more than major changes that bring about temporary destruction.

All we have to do is keep going and make it through the first half of this century in one piece. That's all it will take for technology to advance us through much of the current problems which our species faces.



posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 12:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
Tell me, do you know what happens in a petri dish when Critical Mass is reached?

I'd be interested in which of the two primary results you found most interesting.


Phase transition.

We grow up, else throw up.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join