It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
According to Stone Chelsea alone gets 6 million per year to run the ( money laundering) Clinton Foundation. If it isn't illegal it should be.
originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
a reply to: Boadicea
My bad. I thought there had to be a conviction before a pardon. It seemed to me that Nixon was guilty of perjury or something. I'll chalk that up to the Mandella Effect.
Thanks for setting that straight.
The information is out there...These are not secrets...The Democrats just don't care...
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: hellobruce
So, basically you're saying you don't mind someone this underhanded and manipulative being President? Someone who takes every advantage of their position and power to enrich themselves, at the detriment and risk of the people she's suppose to be protecting? Someone who has shown countless times, she will lie, twist and deflect to hide her schemes? There may be a thin line between legal, ethical and moral, but Clinton passes that line long ago.
She is a pathological liar, who has misled and deceived the American people for decades.
originally posted by: Justso
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
If the shedevil starts to show that she might not be able to continue to take care of their "business" the shedevil might just disappear-or make it look like a Trump or some GOP did her in.
These are interesting times.
Either way-revolution on its way.
They do have evidence.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: 727Sky
regardless of the corruption and illegal acts she has been accused of committing the justice department will not prosecute her
They need this thing called "EVIDENCE" to bring a case for prosecution.... despite what you want!
Even if she was found guilty of half the time honored laws she has evidently broken
Care to show us this "EVIDENCE" you apparently have?
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
a reply to: RickinVa
You can find them on wikileaks:
Mind you, there's 30k plus of them spanning 4 years, so if you want the actual dirt, you are going to need to do some serious narrowing down with more than just key words. A huge amount of them are more or less standard, boring happy thanksgiving or did you see the news crap. If you want the criminal stuff, I think you need specific email or document numbers.
Despite these ongoing scandals, Clinton’s close yet questionable ties to media outlets such as Google, CNN, PBS and The New York Times have seemed to pay off. These entities have gone out of their way to censor negative stories about Clinton, particularly ones involving the Clinton Foundation. There’s one common thread though these media outlets suppressing harmful Clinton stories all share: they’ve donated to the Clinton Foundation.
On Aug. 23 the Associated Press broke the story citing that more than half the people outside of the government that Clinton met with as she served as secretary of state gave money to the Clinton Foundation, either personally or through companies or groups. The AP report concluded that 85 out of 154 people she met with from the private sector either donated to her charity or pledged commitments.