posted on Sep, 6 2016 @ 02:01 AM
a reply to: Noinden
Chinese geneticists disagree, they haven't been poisoned by the dogma of egalitarianism.
So, in this situation where disagreeing with the postmodern dogma of equality will get you harassed and even fired from your job you think people
haven't been conditioned?
Racial differences are evident and also supported by science. You can quote scientists, I can quote scientists.
The generic differences between the so called races are about 1 hundredth if a percent.
Yeah and humans and chimpanzees are about 98.8% similar genetically. Again, one gene is enough to make a person more prone to violence when under the
This guy clearly disagrees with your position.
Richard Dawkins too:
He goes on to disagree with Lewontin's conclusions about taxonomy, writing, "However small the racial partition of the total variation may be, if
such racial characteristics as there are highly correlate with other racial characteristics, they are by definition informative, and therefore of
The argument that there are no clear demarcations between races is like arguing that yellow isn't distinct from blue because they're both part of a
spectrum of colour.
Like it or not but these arguments that these geneticists are making that ordinary people are repeating are based more on political expediency than
anything else. Clearly not everyone agrees with their conclusions, the only difference is one is politically expedient and even popular, the other one
Other arguments that fall short are mainly semantic: races are not a real taxonomic classification. Which ignores the colloquial nature and use of the
word race. If you want to be pedantic we can call them subspecies, which is a word even an article critical of the idea of race used. The point is,
racial differences are real even if they fall short of the taxonomical classification.
edit on 6-9-2016 by TheLaughingGod because: Apparently I can't post a specific link..