It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"You can (also) find them around Uranus and Jupiter. Wherever you see some rings, that is where I see the crafts, I call them a ringmaker."
originally posted by: surfer_soul
a reply to: Spacespider
"You can (also) find them around Uranus and Jupiter. Wherever you see some rings, that is where I see the crafts, I call them a ringmaker."
I never knew there was a ring around Uranus...
Seriously though, is there? Around Jupiter too? I'd imagine a NASA scientist would know their stuff, I'd never heard that before. Good find
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: surfer_soul
a reply to: Spacespider
"You can (also) find them around Uranus and Jupiter. Wherever you see some rings, that is where I see the crafts, I call them a ringmaker."
I never knew there was a ring around Uranus...
Seriously though, is there? Around Jupiter too? I'd imagine a NASA scientist would know their stuff, I'd never heard that before. Good find
The rings around Jupiter were first mentioned by Ingo Swann by remote viewing.
Now this makes a lot of people mad because they don't like the idea that remote viewing works, but it is a fact of life that Ingo Swann first told about the rings around Jupiter.
Jupiter rings
originally posted by: shawmanfromny
Dr. Bergrun believes "living UFO spacecrafts" exist because, "they are capable of the essential functions of biological systems such as self-replication and self-maintenance." This statement reminded me of an article concerning self replicating nano robots that I bookmarked long ago for a future read.
Perhaps the future of artificial intelligence will be both silicon- and carbon-based: digital brains directing complex molecular structures to copulate at the nanometre level and reproduce.
IMO, this seems very plausible when you consider there may be extraterrestrial civilizations that may have developed this technology over hundreds of thousands of years ago. Who knows, maybe there are alien computers that have evolved into artificial life forms that travel the universe in search of other civilizations, or other "alien" worlds to conquer. Insert JAWS theme here.
www.nowtheendbegins.com...
originally posted by: Spacespider
This just out.. one of NASA´s own guys is out and spreading the word there are giant living things in Saturn rings and they are "mating" and multiplying.
And the situation is critical. He also say they live in other ring planets like: Jupiter and Uranus.
This guy have said somehing like this before but the news should be that now he say they are "proliferating" at a critical rate.. or in other words multiplying.. are they mating ?
snip
I think this inability at recognising Ingo's “band of crystals” as a “rings of rocks” tells us that this is an example of a bit of creative interpretation. Also, it's worth mentioning that later in the transcript from 1973 Ingo Swann talks about “those cloud layers, those crystal layers” so I think it's safe to assume the “bands of crystals” were referring to the bands of colours already seen across Jupiter's visible surface from Earth and had nothing to do with any as-yet-undiscovered ring system.
"Each [ie, Swann and Sherman] spoke of glittering ice crystals, winds of terrific velocity, great mountain ranges and powerful magnetic forces."
9. There are still images taken by the Voyager of Saturn that Dr. Norman Bergrun, as author of “Ringmakers of Saturn”, claimed to show a UFO. What do you he possibly mistook it for? This is an example article about Dr. Burgrun’s claim.
Bergrun’s process was to take photos that were published in things like newspapers and magazines, put them under a microscope, and take a photo of them through the microscope’s eyepiece, and then look for weird tings. When going through that process, you are going to find weird things. Every example of a spaceship or alien or whatever that he has can be VERY easily explained by dust or gunk getting in the photo, or uneven illumination, or film grain, and the anomalies he found do not appear in ANY other version of the images.
In fact, one such example that Bergrun points to as a UFO is a bright speck in the bottom of an image, except the bottom part of that image is clearly NOT part of the image that Voyager took because the rings cut-off about 20% of the way from the bottom. This shows that the photo he’s using is a reproduction, including blank area, and he’s pointing to image anomalies caught in that duplication.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Yeah, we'll just ignore the mountain ranges bit, because that discredits everything else he said.
Which was what? Band of crystals or rings of rock?
I'm just pulling quotes from the source you provided remember..
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Spacespider
Here is an explanation...
en.cite-espace.com...