It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mandela Effect - 007 Moonraker; Dolly Has No Braces!

page: 14
47
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 07:45 PM
link   
Longtime Lurker...this is my first post. Just wanted to remind everyone about the connection to the photo of the scientist at CERN holding up the "Bond 1" "Mandela" sign. Not sure if that means anything, but perhaps another example of CERN flaunting their evil plans in our faces.

Personally I don't think we'll truly know the real reason for the ME until many years from now (Think 2040). We'll probably find out that we've been living inside the Nazi's quantum computer which will inteface with our biomechanical implants. At that point the major ME's will come to light, such as Germany having won WW2 and enslaving all of humanity. All I know is ever since this ME phenomenon has begun, walking through the 3rd dimension doesn't feel real anymore.


edit on 29-8-2016 by alien because: ...we don't call people 'Shills' here on ATS...




posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 09:33 PM
link   
By 2040, I doubt anyone will even remember what the Mandela Effect was. Given how old many of us will be by then, our faulty human memories will be quite evident.



posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 09:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jason88
a reply to: Wolfenz

If I let myself agree with the ME in this instance, I will, then I lean toward the Butterfly Effect. A time traveler accidentally steps on a butterfly during prehistoric times, travels home and discovers language has changed because his small action in the past.

Why mundane or pop culture instances? It's something we collectively share and these instances are minor in the scheme of things.

Then again a Butterfly Effect would mean no one knew the changes occured except for the time traveler.

Hmmm....


Right the Butterfly effect .. is a good Point ...





If I let myself agree with the ME in this instance, I will, then I lean toward the Butterfly Effect. A time traveler accidentally steps on a butterfly during prehistoric times, travels home and discovers language has changed because his small action in the past.


right He Steps on it ... as the Sam Butterfly Would of minutes after cause The Prehistoric Early man a different type of Speech if his curious Mind had seen it ... a Paradox Shift as i See it ..

Butterfly effect is a Large Event created from a Simple small event

The tiny breeze from the Tiny Wings cause an Avalanche of Winds causing a Hurricane ..

The Version of the planet of the Apes (2001) shows that effect at the end ...

They may be Minor but could the be Connected ?
Linked to something or someone ?

but in the conspiracy realm as you said Time Traveler ...

all it takes is just that,
Only one person to make a difference in someone life !

Professor Ronald Mallet : has a Brilliant Idea of how to time travel ...
and some other professors agree with him in his theory's
perhaps the put it to the test ...

just may be .. Who knows ...

going back in time Science wont say that its impossible...



posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 09:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: stonerwilliam
I thought she had braces in the Moonraker film ? and seem to remember a few comedy sketches about them kissing and getting stuck together .

Faulty memory again


I believe there have been multiple movies where people with braces got stuck while kissing. I think one of them was sixteen candles in the 1980s...

Unless that turns out to be ME too...
edit on 28-8-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 09:55 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

There is relevance, I know why the mandela effects are "insignificant", but I can only share that info with the chosen ones.



posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

It is here to stay, its like the new aliens exist, and we will continue to find effects.



posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: In4ormant

My wife is not the fat ugly one, I live in that mansion with the Ferrari, and hot blonde.

PS
You are a fellow Mandelite in4ormant...shhh....shhhhh its gonna be alright, don't try to fight it just go with the vibes
edit on 28-8-2016 by seventhinline because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 10:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Moohide
It seems Dollys missing braces were questioned back in 1999.

Dollys Braces.

So it was noticed before this Mendela rubbish.


What this proves is that the glitch in the Matrix occurred long before CERN. So we can rule that out as the cause.



posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 11:52 PM
link   

The scene initially led you to believe that she had braces even though she didn't. As I mentioned, I was 100% sure that chick had braces in the scene. However, upon looking at the scene again, I noticed why I may have ASSUMED she had braces. Because of that assumption, my mind basically just projected she did have braces when in actuality she didn't because I EXPECTED the braces to be there.


Or perhaps folks are just now starting to notice quantum physics at work. There is a reason even Albert Einstein didn't want to touch the subject, and he regretted even getting involved with it. It theoretically could cause exactly what you are describing. Things can be reality for you, but not someone else. The observer is the key. Why do observed particles behave differently than particles that are not monitored?

I wonder if perhaps ME is not multi-dimensions, not someone "screwing with us," but rather, quantum physics at work.
edit on 29-8-2016 by fleabit because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 12:45 AM
link   
a reply to: fleabit



Why do observed particles behave differently than particles that are not monitored?

How do particles which are not "monitored" behave? How is it different from the way in which "monitored" particles behave? How do you know how they are behaving if they are not being "monitored?" ATS polling: "How, as an electron, are you behaving? Are you behaving differently from that electron which has not been included in this poll?

edit on 8/29/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 01:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 01:26 AM
link   
a reply to: BadBoYeed

Yes. I know. Observation (measurement) influences quantum level conditions.

I'll ask again though, how do you know what an unmeasured electron is doing?



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 01:40 AM
link   
The problem with this "Braces" (Americanism) thing, is as I said previously about this, that PoP culture of the 80s and 90s has influenced peoples perceptions SO much, that what they actually remember is confused with the actual reality, that the memory links get entwined, and it is mistakenly assumed that some miraculous "Shift" has occurred. When infect, it is just false implanted memories of sooooo much pop culture, and the brain is confused.

I couldnt tell you how many US movies and TV shows I have watched over the past 40 years...and still occurs today.... where some young chap is looking at an attractive girl, across the hall, at school, on the street, in an office, on a ship, in a plane, at the bar, at the disco etc etc etc, Where when the pretty girl smiles......she nearly ALWAYS has "Braces" and the guys ALL go yewww yuck or some such reaction.

This is implanted in mainly Men's memories, who watch this stuff, and sits in the brain, so when someones says,...Oh Dolly doesnt have braces because she smiled at Jaws and he has teeth........The false memories kick into gear and everyone's brain thinks, oh yeah, every show has a girl with braces, so Dolly must have had braces........but I really cant remember correctly.......

I wonder how many women have had "Mandela Effects", Do you ladies remember Dolly with "Braces" or do you just swoon over James Bond and never saw anything else?

Maybe thats why is called the MANdela Effect and not the FEMALEdela Effect or WOMANdela Effect.

edit on 29-8-2016 by gort51 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 01:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Rezlooper

Erm CERN opened in 1954.....



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 01:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Davg80

Also sort of started the whole interwebs thing. I think.

I think I am.



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 01:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Davg80
a reply to: Rezlooper

Erm CERN opened in 1954.....


The accelerator first went active in 2008, and i think the whole complex started in the 80.

SOURCE


The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world’s largest and most powerful particle accelerator. It first started up on 10 September 2008, and remains the latest addition to CERN’s accelerator complex.

edit on 29-8-2016 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 02:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Mianeye




The accelerator first went active in 2008.

The accelerator? CERN has operated several.
CERN's first accelerator became operational in 1958.
edit on 8/29/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 02:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Ok, my bad



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 02:06 AM
link   
I definetly remember her having braces and I thought there was also a brace shine like with what happened with jaws. Crazy balls. That is odd.



posted on Aug, 29 2016 @ 02:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Mianeye
Mistakes aren't bad.
Unless perpetuated.



new topics

top topics



 
47
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join