It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Pearj
The Ford brand is both iconic and historical. The logo is commonplace and a scrutinized collectors item for some. Needless to say the company has a vast range of fans.
When the Mandela Effect occurred the logo became a strong indicator to those that knew the logo well.
Recently, three new examples of residual evidence came to light..
Here is the current logo for comparison:
For many (myself included), the 'curly q' or 'pigs tail' in the F is new.
Here are the three new pieces of residual evidence found. Click the link for full size.
Dealership Vinyl
OEM Vinyl
OEM Water Pump
Interestingly, Henry Ford's actual signature is closer to how many remember the logo, than what it is today.
So what do you think.. Does the "old" logo look more familiar?
-----
I anticipate based on other ME threads that these things will need to be said:
This is not a company changing it's logo.
Myself and others have checked the images for signs of tampering. Additionally the logo in vinyl on the truck bed is all one piece (not chipped). You're welcome to check yourself.
I don't know what caused the Mandela Effect. I don't advocate a theory.
The ME conversation has gone past faulty memory and common mistakes.
My primary goal is to get evidence to those interested via the OP.
With that said; I assume based on ATS skeptic culture that this thread will fill with jokes, jabs and reasoning based in a general misunderstanding of how the Mandela Effect works. Don't be surprised if I'm not responsive to comments of this nature.
Sources:
Dealership Vinyl
OEM Vinyl
OEM Water Pump
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: FarCrowd
Well don't hold your breath for that evidence as it will never show up.
The ME is nothing more than a way to make money off the gullible by the lady who created it in 2010.
As for the Ford logo...it has been shown numerous times they changed it over the years as do many other companies, but the OP just doesn't want to know he has been had with the whole ME bs.
originally posted by: GoShredAK
That's why it is called residual evidence.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: FarCrowd
The ME is nothing more than a way to make money off the gullible by the lady who created it in 2010.
originally posted by: Pearj
lol - has nothing to do with a logo change.
Do you think the water pump is pre 1912?
I think those that say it's a logo change, don't understand what the Mandela Effect is.
originally posted by: 711117
a reply to: eriktheawful
This post is neutral to OP's point and against
If this is accurate it shows that the curl was always there, like how each berenstain book says berenstain as far back as you go, but people remember it as berenstein. I don't know why half these comments are people stating that companies change their logos like every single person is not already aware of this fact.. And all the anger; i'd rather have someone put something out there than keep it to themselves. That's what this site is for right. What's the motivation behind clicking the thread when you're just going to drop an essay length rant with research links on something you think is ridiculous (not directing this toward the dude i'm quoting). Just seems like a waste of time lol
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: GoShredAK
That's why it is called residual evidence.
Funny this ^^
When skeptics post evidence to show ME is a delusion, they are told that's only proof of this timeline, not theirs.
When believers post evidence to show ME is real, it is accepted as such and called 'residual' evidence.
Hypocritical much?
At any rate, it does seem odd that the multiverse keeps cropping up wherever we look. "It's proven remarkably hard to write down a theory which produces exactly the universe we see and nothing more," says physicist Max Tegmark.
But others take seriously the idea that there are countless other "yous", created every time a quantum measurement is made. The quantum multiverse must be in some sense real, they say, because quantum theory demands it and quantum theory works.
In 1999, Randall and her colleague Raman Sundrum suggested that the branes do not just carry gravity, they produce it by curving space. In effect this means that a brane "concentrates" gravity, so that it looks weak in a second brane nearby.
This could also explain why we could live on a brane with infinite extra dimensions without noticing them. If their idea is true, there is an awful lot of space out there for other universes.
In contrast, the other universes of the many-worlds interpretation do not exist in other dimensions or other regions of space. Instead, they are right here, superimposed on our Universe but invisible and inaccessible. The other selves they contain really are "you".
In fact, there is no meaningful "you" at all. "You" are becoming distinct beings an absurd number of times every second: just think of all the quantum events that happen as a single electrical signal travels along a single neuron in your brain. "You" vanish into the crowd.
originally posted by: Agartha
Sorry, double post...... I blame CERN for it!
Bubble universes that get close too each other, may even stick together, if only temporarily, creating holes and cracks in the outer membrane. If they are joined together, like so many bubbles, then perhaps some of the physical material from one, could be transferred into the other. Now you know where that strange stuff growing inside the refrigerator came from: another dimension.
Voila: Shadow galaxy, and, a shadow universe with, shadow life made of dark matter!
As hypothesized by Susan Randall of Harvard University and MIT, maybe it can be found in a shadow universe where, presumably, shadow doppelgangers (just like us, but made of dark matter) ponder the nature of the universe.
We may be sitting right on top of a shadowverse complete with dark stars, dark planets, and dark life. Harvard University theorist Lisa Randall and her colleagues say that giving dark matter a life of its own would explain away some of the weirdness that scientists don't understand about the properties of dark matter. Of course, this theory opens up a whole new realm of weirdness.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
There seems to be a problem in that there can be no proof either way atm.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
What if universes could touch and share, it could possibly explain every oddity ever known, every ghost, supernatural, weird sky falls, strange behavior changes, schizophrenia, missing people and items, odd animal behavior,found odd items, sightings of unknown animals, things in the sky, miracles....