Mandela Effect - Ford Logo - Three New Strong Evidences Found

a reply to: SeaWorthy

mandelaeffect.com ?
I don't see how that changes the fact that the Mandela effect is a made up thing that people on the internet are trying to make real.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Pearj

Prove it.

lol say what?

I'm tempted to take this as trolling, but here's a reply anyway..

You're the one with the exaggerated claim to know my memory better than me - so the burden of proof is on you my friend. Isn't it more likely it's your opinion that I'm remembering plain lettering?

Or do you mean I should prove that my post is about a logo and not plain text?

Ok...

"My post is about the stylized logo, not the plain text logo."

There ya go... all proven. Again, I can't spell out everything obvious. If I knew the plain text logo to of changed, I would of posted examples of that.

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
The design is clearly a copy of the signature no matter whose idea it was.

You will have to excuse me for taking Henry Ford's word over yours.

originally posted by: DelMarvel
a reply to: Pearj

Let me ask again: Isn't the premise of the Mandela effect that timelines shift? So why would pictures of the logo from the old timeline exist in the supposed new timeline?

Sorry, didn't think you were honestly looking for an answer.

Yes, that's the premise.

Evidence of the past in the form of images etc are often called "Residual" evidences in the ME sphere.

Nobody knows why this 'residue' is left behind.

I'm sorry OP but you have completely lost me (and most likely others):

You are saying that because companies do change their logos, that it is proof of ME?

Companies are not allowed to change their logos?

Or are you trying to say that's Ford's current logo is not what you remember, and that "from your world" the older one is still being used?

You are not coming off very clear here.

a reply to: Pearj

I'm tempted to take this as trolling, but here's a reply anyway..

Take it as you want but I have extensive knowledge of the Ford brand , I grew up with a Mk 1 Escort as the family car and have owned a Mk 2 Escort , Cortina and Capri , the badge has always had the curly F and the lettering is as shown in the posted picture .

So unless only "special" people time shift you are wrong , the stylized vehicle logo has always had had the curly F.

a reply to: eriktheawful

Same reason why my old Edelbrock carburetor said "Carter" in the debossed part of the molded body, IIRC.

originally posted by: eriktheawful
a reply to: Pearj

Go back and read my lost post on page one.

No. I already read it the first time.

Also, you should suggest instead of tell.

a reply to: Pearj


So, in the end, after you all work yourselves up into tremendous states, railing against the world shattering dimensional shifts that are happening only to a tiny sector of (almost exclusively) North Americans, what then?

What is going to happen? Are you hoping for some kind of recognition of the fact? I mean you can't just leap back to your timestream I suppose so what is the end game for you Mandela Effect proponents?

I am really wondering about that.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: SeaWorthy

mandelaeffect.com ?
I don't see how that changes the fact that the Mandela effect is a made up thing that people on the internet are trying to make real.

The name of the website is the problem? How do you know the whole thing is made up? Certainly many people who don't think so. Under the premise of possible effects we can't describe there is no way someone can just know it does not exist.

What is reality? Can we answer that question? What is possible/impossible?

In the world of quantum, infinitesimally small particles, weird and often logic-defying behaviors abound. Perhaps the strangest of these is the idea of superposition, in which objects can exist simultaneously in two or more seemingly counterintuitive states. For example, according to the laws of quantum mechanics, electrons may spin both clockwise and counterclockwise, or be both at rest and excited, at the same time.

news.mit.edu...

originally posted by: peck420

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
The design is clearly a copy of the signature no matter whose idea it was.

You will have to excuse me for taking Henry Ford's word over yours.

No problem, I simply can't see any difference between the logo and the signature

a reply to: SeaWorthy

How do you know the whole thing is made up?

Because the information is freely available

The Mandela Effect was first described online in 2010, by a blogger named Fiona Broome. Broome described an experience at a convention called Dragon Con, where she discovered that others had a false memory similar to hers, which was that Nelson Mandela had died during his imprisonment in the 1980s
knowyourmeme.com...

What is missing from all these ME discussions is testimony from someone who says something like:

"I worked in the Ford factory for twenty years looking at the logo all day long everyday and one day we came in and the logo had magically changed."

Or;

"I worked at Barnes and Noble for years and one day I was looking at the computer and "Berenstein" magically changed into "Berenstain" right in front of me and all the books on the shelves were changed, too."

Instead, it's all people saying "I remember it being different a long time ago."

Double post.

originally posted by: eriktheawful
I'm sorry OP but you have completely lost me (and most likely others):

You are saying that because companies do change their logos, that it is proof of ME?

Companies are not allowed to change their logos?

Or are you trying to say that's Ford's current logo is not what you remember, and that "from your world" the older one is still being used?

You are not coming off very clear here.

Man you are way off.

I think many clearly understand what I'm saying.

How you got where you is beyond me, and helping you in particular seems like it will take more time that I'm willing to invest - because..

I'd suggest looking into the Mandela Effect for a better understanding - but I think you're already well aware. That makes me question your comment and lean towards thinking you're purposefully working to confuse new readers to the topic.

Why is also beyond me. You can't stop those interested from reading the OP, and you gain very little with silly (imo) arguments on page 4. Also, you're giving those readers very little credit, as what looks like your agenda is as transparent to them as it is to me.

Just my honest opinion, I'm not expecting you (or me) to change. In fact, I rely on your thread 'bumps'.

originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: Pearj


So, in the end, after you all work yourselves up into tremendous states, railing against the world shattering dimensional shifts that are happening only to a tiny sector of (almost exclusively) North Americans, what then?

What is going to happen? Are you hoping for some kind of recognition of the fact? I mean you can't just leap back to your timestream I suppose so what is the end game for you Mandela Effect proponents?

I am really wondering about that.

For my part it is just of extreme interest as it would be to you I am sure if suddenly things you are sure one way are instantly another? Talking about why with others who have seen the same changes is a natural thing to do in this circumstance. Do you not agree?

a reply to: Pearj

Okay, you do not want to give a straight answer. That's on you, and everyone that reads your post will see that.

Here is what your OP is saying:

Ford's current logo is somehow proof of ME.

You show photos out of context (when they were taken, how old the things in the photos are, etc, etc) and declare them proof and have tried to say that Ford has never changed it's logo.

That this is somehow proof of ME.

Logos change. Showing pictures out of context is not proof, it's misleading, and is certainly not proof of ME.

I'm not the one straying off topic here. I'm trying to have a discussion with you. Something you do not seem interested in. Instead of the ball, you want to go after the player.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: johnb

I wouldn't notice a change in any logo unless it happened in front of me

Theres the rub, lack of forensics. Not one actual Mandella (time shift) caught on video. I mean really? YouTube is filled with fake UFO stuff, wheres all the Mandella time warps?

C'mon psyops department!

I found this of interest because the product is not supposed to exist and never has according to today's information.
No name change
en.wikipedia.org...(peanut_butter)

originally posted by: Popeye1
Interesting. I have a lot of old Ford stuff around here. Most all of it is from late 60s and early 70s. Everything I just went to look at has no curly q on the F. But then going to look at a 92 ford truck I have the logos on it have the curl. Not sure about that being Mandela or just a change in the logo somewhere between those years.

Thanks! This obviously proves that not only are there 2 timelines, but when you switched from one to the other (without knowing it, untill today), you brought all your old Ford logos over with you ....

originally posted by: eriktheawful
I'm sorry OP but you have completely lost me (and most likely others):

You are saying that because companies do change their logos, that it is proof of ME?

Companies are not allowed to change their logos?

Or are you trying to say that's Ford's current logo is not what you remember, and that "from your world" the older one is still being used?

You are not coming off very clear here.

Let me help you grasp it. The OP is saying that for many people, the Ford logo has changed. You tried to explain it by telling the OP that companies change their logo.

The OP, being aware of this, and even mentioning in his OP that this is not due to a logo change, explains that the logo did not change in the timeframe in which these people were around to experience the logo.

So it is not relevant that the logo might have been changed around 1900. It has had the little swirl for a century, and this is what people think is different.

Do you get it now after three explanations?