Breaking: Report Confirms That Donald Trump Will BEAT Hillary Clinton By A LANDSLIDE! OMG!

a reply to: imitator

Here is a youtube thumb gauge....... the real votes will be in favor for Trump.

Has it ever dawned on you that youtube isn't only for voting eligible Americans right? For all you know not a single one of them could vote for him.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Edumakated

A packed auditorium doesn't mean votes. People go because it's free and ya never know what that clown is gonna do.
He doesn't pack stadiums lol. He equates crowds with votes.
His big mistake.

And the sea of red "Make America Great Again" hats at these rallies are just onlookers?
Oh phuleeze!

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: imitator

Here is a youtube thumb gauge....... the real votes will be in favor for Trump.

Has it ever dawned on you that youtube isn't only for voting eligible Americans right? For all you know not a single one of them could vote for him.

Yeah because kids enjoy listening to politics right?
The ignorance in this thread is thick...

Justin bieber fills in stadiums daily, maybe you guys should look into having him run next time, it would probably help with the woman vote for the repubicans.

While equating crowds at rallies with votes may be problematic....

It still begs the question as to how Trump can be packing stadiums, while Hillary has to have paid attendees and/or cancels due to bad attendance, yet she shows higher in the polls.

It's certainly more than just odd, don't you think?

originally posted by: JAY1980

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: imitator

Here is a youtube thumb gauge....... the real votes will be in favor for Trump.

Has it ever dawned on you that youtube isn't only for voting eligible Americans right? For all you know not a single one of them could vote for him.

Yeah because kids enjoy listening to politics right?
The ignorance in this thread is thick...

No but they are quick to jump on a bandwagon. You are right though about the ignorance being thick in this thread.

originally posted by: Gazrok
While equating crowds at rallies with votes may be problematic....

It still begs the question as to how Trump can be packing stadiums, while Hillary has to have paid attendees and/or cancels due to bad attendance, yet she shows higher in the polls.

It's certainly more than just odd, don't you think?

Not odd at all. My point seems to keep being ignored. Most of Hillary's "supporters" are people who don't really want Hillary but the thought of a Trump Presidency terrifies them. They don't go to rallies, they don't deck themselves out in clothes and bumper stickers supporting their candidate but at the end of the day they will vote for her.

Yeah Breitbart isn't nearly as accurate as Ebony or Jet,

originally posted by: Gazrok
It still begs the question as to how Trump can be packing stadiums, while Hillary has to have paid attendees and/or cancels due to bad attendance, yet she shows higher in the polls.

It's certainly more than just odd, don't you think?

A lot of the hype about Trump "packing stadiums" is just BS that the MSM is going along with.

Use a search engine to look up "attendance at Trump rallies."

a reply to: Anonex

That's not entirely true.

In 2008, I was very worried. Obama had all the enthusiasm in his base that Trump has now. You could say that you knew a bunch of McCain supporters but all of them were lukewarm at best on the idea of voting for McCain.

And come election day, the results confirmed that. Obama supporters were eager, even rabid to vote and all of them bothered to make it out to drop their ballots.

This year the enthusiam levels are reversed. Hillary voters say they will vote for Hillary but not many of them really want to. How many are voting for her as opposed to simply voting against Trump? You had the same thing going on for both Romney and McCain over the last two cycles and it wasn't enough. Then you also have the additional problem that the press is constantly pushing the narrative that a Clinton win is a foregone conclusion.

They are doing it to kill Trump's enthusiasm, but if you are a Hillary voter and you are already apathetic about her at best and you figure that she's winning in a landslide ... how likely are you going to be to take the time out of your day to actually bother to drop your ballot?

I mean, there's no way Trump's winning right? The media and all the polls say so.

originally posted by: Gazrok
While equating crowds at rallies with votes may be problematic....

It still begs the question as to how Trump can be packing stadiums, while Hillary has to have paid attendees and/or cancels due to bad attendance, yet she shows higher in the polls.

It's certainly more than just odd, don't you think?

Not at all. Trump is running on charisma; it is about him, not the issues. Hillary has the Democratic "ground game" behind her. The ward bosses will deliver the votes; no need to gather with True Believers.

a reply to: DJW001

Oh, voter fraud!

Yes, well.. when you don't have direct cozy access to almost all of the mainstream media.

Let's compare some little company on a shoestring budget to the all encompassing media of those 6 companies that control 90% of the media.

Let's ignore that Hillary seemingly has insider access to almost all media in the US. That usually means they're bought and paid for.. or rather, directly owned by the people supporting Hillary Clinton.

Clinton is the president that will condition people to a new normal where politicians and candidates won't even try to conceal their corruption. The externalisation of the globalist hierarchy.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: DJW001

Oh, voter fraud!

It's not voter fraud if it is not an actual election. On the other hand:

www.theatlantic.com...

It's only going to get worse.

My money is on Trump. I don't care what anyone says, Trump will win, its obvious, otherwise the media wouldn't be begging us not to vote for him. Rule number 1 during elections: WHOEVER THE MEDIA TELLS YOU NOT TO VOTE FOR THEN THATS WHO YOU VOTE FOR.

originally posted by: yeahright
Trump's like Internet porn. The traffic's almost incalculably huge, but no one admits to viewing it.

I'm just skimming the free stuff-- I'll never pay for the
hard-core, YR.
And as far as German Amateur Punishment Shaving for
a category, I don't need it. I live there.

Back strictly to OP.. this election cycle is so stacked
with Craigslist Cheerers and Geriatrics (like me) who
haven't voted since Dutch and Nancy had real hair
pigment. It's probably not going to be a machine flip-
pable election this time: that's almost certain.
But I'd settle for 5 to 7 percent one way or the other;
just because a close call might be a call to something else.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Gazrok
While equating crowds at rallies with votes may be problematic....

It still begs the question as to how Trump can be packing stadiums, while Hillary has to have paid attendees and/or cancels due to bad attendance, yet she shows higher in the polls.

It's certainly more than just odd, don't you think?

Not at all. Trump is running on charisma; it is about him, not the issues. Hillary has the Democratic "ground game" behind her. The ward bosses will deliver the votes; no need to gather with True Believers.

and that's why in Reno she was repeating to everyone "i'll need your help in november".

a reply to: DJW001

I have a question... Who uses that website for news? I have never heard of that website until just now. It is not a well known source of news to me. And none of my friends have ever heard of this website.

originally posted by: GiulXainx
a reply to: DJW001

I have a question... Who uses that website for news? I have never heard of that website until just now. It is not a well known source of news to me. And none of my friends have ever heard of this website.

noone. it was made by some crazy fanboy. it's even possible that it was made by someone working for Hillary to discredit Trump, but that's a stretch.

bottom line is, with the amount of cash Trump has, he wouldn't deal with such a crap - seriously, a highschool student with basic wordpress knowledge would create a far more professional looking site.

but Trump haters will dig up everything, cover it in lies ("founded two months before Trump declared his candidacy") and use it as a # to throw at him, despite the fact it has nothing to do with him at all.

i mean, it's a #ing internet. should we use threads like this to discredit Hillary? he had to get some money from her for posting such crap, right?

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: JAY1980

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: imitator

Here is a youtube thumb gauge....... the real votes will be in favor for Trump.

Has it ever dawned on you that youtube isn't only for voting eligible Americans right? For all you know not a single one of them could vote for him.

Yeah because kids enjoy listening to politics right?
The ignorance in this thread is thick...

No but they are quick to jump on a bandwagon. You are right though about the ignorance being thick in this thread.

Or it could just be extreme arrogance that makes you think it is ignorance..