Originally posted by smallpeeps
Not sure about this. The first reference I have is in a book called "Pawns in the Game" by William Guy Carr [1968]. He says:
After an exchange of crdentials Father [Eustace] Eilers [of the Passionist Missions, Birmingham Alabama] provided me with a copy of "The Mystery
of Freemasonry Unveiled" written by His Eminence Cardinal Caro Y Rodriguez of Santiago, Chile, first published in 1925.
Carr then says that this Cardinal quoted from Pike's letter to Mazzini, but still no proof.
Sorry, I should have clarified. I'd meant that the story of such a letter being in the British Museum seems to have originated with Freemasonry
Watch, although it is possible that it was fabricated elsewhere too. The actually story of such a letter existing is probably tied into the Taxil
hoax, because it was expounded upon by the Roman Catholic clergy.
QUESTION: Would Pike have been the same caliber of man without Freemasonry? Would he have thought as highly of himself if he had not been a
Freemason? Or was it masonry that gave him the tools to be so strong? Would [insert great non-masonic person here] have been even greater with the
tools, comrades and connections Freemasonry provides?
Pike was already in his 40's when he became a Mason, so the fraternity cannot take credit for his character and integrity. However, it seems that
Masonry was able to channel his creativity, and set him on the road of a deeper study of philosophy and history.
Also, why do so many masons act as if they know everything when they have so many hidden levels above them? I mean, what's to say that when
you ascend to the 33rd level, they won't whisper in your ear; "Guess what! Everything we've told you to deny is actually TRUE! Don't tell the
guys on level 27."?
This is a misconception held by many outside of the fraternity. But the actuality is that such levels do not exist. A Masonic degree is not a
"level", it's simply the ceremony of being admitted into the fraternity.
To use your example, when a Mason joins the Scottish Rite, he gets all the degrees from the 4° to the 32° at one time; in other words, per your
example, no one stops at the 27°. Candidates are seated in the auditorium, and the degree ceremonies are performed by the officers on stage, back to
back. They're done in costume, with stage props, lighting, music, etc., identical to plays.
The 33° of the Scottish Rite was originally only an administrative degree, conferred as an honorariam on those who had been elected members of the
Supreme Council. The Supreme Council amended its Constitution just over a century ago to allow the 33° to be conferred on any 32° Mason as an
honorary degree in recognition of outstanding service. In doing so, they also created two other honors, called Knight Commander of the Court of Honour
and Grand Cross of the Court of Honour. These honors are meant simply to recognize those Brothers who take the time and effort to participate.
But it should be stated unequivocally that all Masons are equal; in Masonry, the Level, a craftsman's tool, symbolizes this. A 33° Mason is not on a
higher level than a 3° Mason. It's true that the 33° Mason has had a great honor bestowed upon him, but he only has one vote in the Lodge, just
like everyone else. And one only has to have the Third Degree to be elected Master of the Lodge, and he's the guy in charge.