Anjem Choudary MI5 Honeypot For Nutters

The controversial situation led to a build-up of tension between the two sides with police feeling “frustrated” that Choudary was not being brought to justice . . .

. . .

Serious questions were raised as to why Choudary was allowed to continue spreading his Islamist poison across Britain for more than 20 years, but now a counter terror source has said MI5 were responsible.

. . .

Raffaello Pantucci, a terrorism expert at the Royal United Services Institute, said: “Intelligence officers have to generate leads somewhere, so if you have got a kind of honeypot that is Anjem Choudary and every nutter in the UK is gravitating towards him and from there you just trail them and follow them, you can see how it’s doing your job for you in some ways."

www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...


This man was protected by MI5 for many years so we could have the advantage of catching "nutters". Police wanted him put away. MI5 wanted him free.

He is described as being clever.

Could he possibly not have known he is an MI5 asset?

What is the advantage in catching the "nutters"?

Why do police want it nipped in the bud while MI5 want an ongoing pantomime?

What part do MI5 play in shutting down the major child abuse investigations? www.abovetopsecret.com...

Does anyone here trust MI5 to behave honourably?

a reply to: Kester

to whatever extent these scenarios are true, they always result in the same paradox whereby the 'asset' is permitted to go unpunished and the bad guys they expose are also permitted to go unpunished. This is because if a mover was made against the bad guys, the 'assets' would soon realize they are an asset and have been leading someone to the bad guys.

This causes the assets to simply stop, dissapper or life a life of crime with immunity.

I read this accused in WW2 whereby the allies were getting excellent intelligence from inside Hitlers inner circle but they never acted on it because to do would expose their source so they just kept on letting allied soldiers getting killed so they could more excellent quality intelligence they never acted on.

a reply to: Kester

Its smart move.

Its like smokeing rats out.

We dont know were these Jihadis are. So letting Choudary wander around we can see who he has contact with then watch them.

originally posted by: Kester

The controversial situation led to a build-up of tension between the two sides with police feeling “frustrated” that Choudary was not being brought to justice . . .

. . .

Serious questions were raised as to why Choudary was allowed to continue spreading his Islamist poison across Britain for more than 20 years, but now a counter terror source has said MI5 were responsible.

. . .

Raffaello Pantucci, a terrorism expert at the Royal United Services Institute, said: “Intelligence officers have to generate leads somewhere, so if you have got a kind of honeypot that is Anjem Choudary and every nutter in the UK is gravitating towards him and from there you just trail them and follow them, you can see how it’s doing your job for you in some ways."

www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...


This man was protected by MI5 for many years so we could have the advantage of catching "nutters". Police wanted him put away. MI5 wanted him free.

He is described as being clever.

Could he possibly not have known he is an MI5 asset?

What is the advantage in catching the "nutters"?

Why do police want it nipped in the bud while MI5 want an ongoing pantomime?

What part do MI5 play in shutting down the major child abuse investigations? www.abovetopsecret.com...

Does anyone here trust MI5 to behave honourably?

A 'terrorism expert' who is associated with an independent think tank has theorised, and you therefore treat that as a fact. You seem to do that an awful lot when it feeds into your beliefs.

a reply to: Kester

If you climb a mountain, you get a different view from those on the ground. That's how I see situations like these. MI5 are higher up the mountain than the domestic police and see a bigger picture. *

The police saw him as an asshole on their patch and responded to public complaints and the risk he posed to public order - he was their problem.

On the other hand, MI5 didn't have to worry about the public or the police and could see Choudary more as an asset. He was better off for them as a dog turd drawing flies than being in the prison system.**

* not saying I always agree with it
** if the report is accurate

a reply to: Kandinsky

Here the think as much of a vile person Anjem Choudary is, he was just a loud mouthed pussy who wouldnt commit violence himeself, he would expect others to do the dirty work. The scum he attarcted however are the terrorists of the future and the ones who could do the most damage. Now hopefully MI5 have a list of those to watch.

a reply to: crazyewok

Yep I agree with you on that.

I also hope all the media publicity didn't make more radicals than were identified by the MI5.

a reply to: Kester

What part do MI5 play in shutting down the major child abuse investigations?

Future power and control depends upon people who have spiritual / physical abilities.

MI5 will always keep their MKUltra labs open to train children to become future Greek letter alters throughout all government offices, banking, commerce, military and secret societies.

Delta units (assassins) will go to the military.
Gamma units (spiritual gurus) will play their part in the one world religion.
Beta units will be employed in the entertainment industry.

These are the new age Super Soldiers that are trained from childhood. The child abuse, allows the mind to split into alters. These alters are what the elite train.