Trump calls out media cameraman for not showing the huge crowd.

a reply to: TheBulk
Here's the latest one. This is more misapplying statistical data than an inaccuracy though.

Trump has cited the 58% statistic before, a figure likely extrapolated from the employment-population ratio, which shows that 42.7% of blacks ages 16 to 24 had a job in July. But that doesn't mean that those without a job are necessarily looking for one, so a CNNMoney Reality Check earlier this month found Trump's claim to be true, but misleading.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

What you just posted says Trumps facts were right. Why are you trying to downplay problems in the black community now all of a sudden? Left wingers are constantly speaking about these things in very dramatic terms. Now that Democrats are on the defensive, you want people to think things really aren't so bad for black people?

Do you see how the world changes to fit your immediate political needs? I'm guessing no.

a reply to: TheBulk

This is more misapplying statistical data than an inaccuracy though.

Learn to read.

But whatever. You believe what you want to believe. If you honestly think that Trump preaching to a bunch of white people is going to attract more black votes, then do you. I think that is a laughably dumb premise, but I tire of talking to you and you not bothering to attempt to ever understand what I say.

"It would literally be the best thing that could happen if the cameras would turn away from Donald Trump and take a real good look at the people in attendance at his rallies.

It's a win-win. "

Boy, that's the truth.

An awful lot of them (and they are an awful lot) look drunk and ginned-up like yahoos at a wrestling match or hockey game. Same group that think Monster Truck Rallies are the height of entertainment.

Do those kind of people show up to vote on boring ol' voting day?

Cuz that would require a minimum of sobriety and calendar-reading skills.

a reply to: JimNasium

Let me start off by saying I am NOT a Killary supporter...

...but the $6B is from poor contract management, not actual money lost. I'm in federal contract management and most contract specialists I know are garbage at maintaining files. It is still a possibility she had signatory authority, although unlikely.

Ugh, now I want to see the contracts...

See what you did, maybe the Federal Procurement Data System, FPDS, can help!

Yes because we all know not showing crowd size is the perfect way to tank a run in the eyes of people watching it!
Holy hell, I don't understand why you all harp on this so much! We get it, he draws in lots of people that are already voting for him. That doesn't some how change that he is losing...

originally posted by: Sremmos80
Yes because we all know not showing crowd size is the perfect way to tank a run in the eyes of people watching it!
Holy hell, I don't understand why you all harp on this so much! We get it, he draws in lots of people that are already voting for him. That doesn't some how change that he is losing...

Yes its part of an overall strategy to depress the Trump vote. Some people they will just discourage, others they will shame in to not voting.

a reply to: TheBulk

How? They are not actively saying he isn't drawing crowds...

Where is the shame?

a reply to: bonsaihorn


Let Me know if I can also route You the link where The Clinton Fraudation™, the $$ laundering arm of the Clinton Cabal, has taken in millions from foreign interests, so much that Her hubby, the last POTUS to be impeached, had to make an announcement that She would no longer be accepting donations "IF" elected, no word on if She weren't elected...

Stay Hydrated...

originally posted by: eNumbra
So he's calling out the guys who's job it is to film the candidate for doing his job? 'K.

I can't imagine anyone being that stupid to make a statement like that. But I've been proven wrong before.

a reply to: TheBulk

It would be so easy if the Trump campaign had its own tv crew and made the final signal available to all tv channels.

Much like the camera games and everything else played by the liberal media, the polls mean about as much as their "news" is worth. When a news station who is supposed to report facts and truths decides to sell its soul to corruption and liars, they become valueless. Their words, their actions, their opinions and their reporting is suspect at least and marginalized at worst. All the major news stations have been caught with their fingers in the progressive cookie jar and those of us smart enough to realize, treat them like ghosts. They are nothing and their words are best viewed as lies from the start.

The game is over. Everyone knows what Clinton is, everyone knows what the news is and everyone knows those who blindly support the corruption. They will all fall eventually. That is what happens to corrupt liars and enemies. And yes, you...and all those corruption supporting voters are the enemy. Give it time. Yours will come.

a reply to: TheBulk

I really enjoyed this video, people tend to forget how biased and controlled even the simplest of methods can be that really change how you see someone. Like not showing the grand scale of his rallies. Seeing literally 10 people behind him makes it look like he is in a small room. Camera trickery (slight of hand methods) really do confuse lots of people unfairly.

I am so glad he made a point of this and shows his genuine nature. He is actually turning the tides for once in politics.

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE

originally posted by: eNumbra
So he's calling out the guys who's job it is to film the candidate for doing his job? 'K.

I can't imagine anyone being that stupid to make a statement like that. But I've been proven wrong before.

Still waiting for anything other than deflection or insults; but I'm patient.

Luckily I went to one of if not the top schools in the country for live production. I can tell you first hand that the camera, any camera, they were using was on a tripod. Now these aren't your tripods for your Sony handy cam. No these tripods are around 5-6,000$ a piece. They are the smoothest panning tilting things ever. On top of that most of them have wheels as well. Also they detach from said tripods very easily with one lever. That guy could get shots of the crowd had he wanted. I also know how common getting such shots are and directors for such things use them all the time for things like commercial breaks or event openings and closings as a sort of segway in and out. If it suited the media's agenda for you to know the size of the event you damn well would. They would use little tricks to make it look bigger even.

Also wanted to add that I'm sure that wasn't the only cam op from wherever he was filming for. When your feed is going to possibly be on TV you send 3-6 maybe more.

a reply to: TheBulk

The ESTABLISHMENT media is united in trying to manufacture outrage about anything Trump says or does on a 24/7 basis.

IS this not what the media do ?...You could replace the word trump in the above statement with any other like black man or Muslim, refugee...name your poison....of course we are being lied to and the manufactured outrage keeps on building....

On topic.... Trump should have walked around the area so the camera followed him, he wants the camera to view the crowd that would be one way of doing it...

And then on the other hand the DNC had to pay a bit of money to get some butts in seats.

If polls did not exist... Show the evidence that Hillary is winning.

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

He should be using a nice journeyman mic so he doesn't even have to hold it. If he wants to be a man of the people or the people's man he needs to get in there with them. I can't believe they haven't brought this up to him. I mean the man did a freaking TV show he should know quite a few production guru types.

originally posted by: kyleplatinum
If polls did not exist... Show the evidence that Hillary is winning.

This is a tally a good point if polls didn't exist they used to use rallys to tell popularity. That'd why candidates like Lincoln held them in the first place so thr press could tell how large the crowds were in there newspapers. For those that don't know they actually read newspapers you had to buy very archaic. On a more serious note the ability to fill a vunue can show support in a particular area or more importantly a lack of it. If I held a rally in say iowa and fill a stadium but I hold one in California and barely fill the front row you can tell my support is weak in California

So if a candidate has trouble getting a couple of hundred seats filled there really is a problem.