It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Colin Powell Says Hillary Clinton's 'People Have Been Trying to Pin' Email Scandal on Him

page: 4
53
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 03:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vdogg
It appears that she was telling the complete and total truth, though I don't expect this to get much play on ATS. Nope, this one will sink straight to the bottom.

www.cnn.com...

But..But...Emails!!!111 Benghazi!!1!1!1


Expect the chirp of crickets...




posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 10:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: Vdogg
It appears that she was telling the complete and total truth, though I don't expect this to get much play on ATS. Nope, this one will sink straight to the bottom.

www.cnn.com...

But..But...Emails!!!111 Benghazi!!1!1!1


Expect the chirp of crickets...


Almost told the truth... she was using her email setup a year before he sent that email. He is still not worthy of being a dogcatcher none the less.

You do understand that if she says she took his advice on how to skirt FOIA laws and that's why she did it.... she would be admitting to a crime.

She states quite clearly that Powell DID NOT influence her decision... she has too.... you guys are only too happy to point out that Powell told her to do it, she took his advice and did it..... while conveniently forgetting that his advice was how to commit a crime and get away with it.

EDIT to add:

So which is it?

1. Did Hillary Clinton take the advice of Colin Powell and decide to use a private email server and account in a effort to avoid being subject to FOIA laws?

Or

2. Did Colin Powell's advise have nothing to do with her decision to go with the private server and account as stated by Clinton herself?

I will give you a hint... one of those 2 answers is admitting to planning to commit a criminal act in advance of doing so.


edit on R582016-09-08T22:58:46-05:00k589Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R592016-09-08T22:59:35-05:00k599Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R092016-09-08T23:09:06-05:00k099Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 07:52 AM
link   
Sitting here waiting on the Congressional inquiry into Powell's emails...and waiting...and waiting...



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 09:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vdogg
Sitting here waiting on the Congressional inquiry into Powell's emails...and waiting...and waiting...


There is nothing to inquire about.

Records were turned over, The SD had them in public archives for years.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:45 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

Its the latest Democratic talking point to deflect from Clinton. The House government reform and oversight committee had 4 members of the state department who are responsible for FOIA and records retention appear yesterday. Elijah Cummings and several other Dem Congressman/Congresswomen went full force with the Powell emails.

My question is at what point do the actions of members of Congress to protect a person who violated the law become law violators themselves by trying to protect the person by blocking evidence / obstructing?

That comment applies to both parties.



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 08:55 PM
link   
Bump



new topics

top topics
 
53
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join