It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Secret Service and attendees attacked at Trump Rally....no arrests

page: 3
65
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:
+30 more 
posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: matafuchs

Firsrt, the video would not run in Maxthon. So I switched to Edge. The american mirror has so many popups and ads with sound, they were competing with the videos.

I don;t see anyone running anywhere, they were walking.

I don't know how you say 'SJWs', and the article says leftists. I have no idea who these people are.


You continue to defend these people in EVERY single thread made about them. No matter the evidence, you try and turn it around like it is someone else doing it or that they have a valid reason for behaving the way they do. You are, of course entitled to your own opinions, but they seem to be far out of this world, concerning logic and common sense.

The left, not every single one, but as a whole, are violent vile creatures, period. Who when they do not get their way, resort to vile disgusting behavior. The same behavior that they claim the right to be.




posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   
A reminder...

This is NOT the Mud Pit. Please refrain from political trollery, personal attacks and other such shenanigans. The full T&C applies here.

Remember that posts removed as political trollery automatically count as two warnings. So no tears if you can't abide with the consequences. Consider this fair warning.

As usual, do not reply to this post.



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: KTemplar

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: KTemplar

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: reldra

So you agree with their actions?


I would go about protesting differently. I would not jump on any car. But it doesn;t appear anyone was hurt.



It was uncalled for, disrespectful, and how does anyone know that the people spitting didn't have hep C or some other communicable disease.




Absolutely disgusting behavior!


None of this are reasons to shoot people. Have not you seen videos of actually violent protests? This was loud and disorderly but not the most important

protest video I have seen posted.




I didn't say anything about shooting people. I am referring to the old gentleman that was pushed, and the spitting on of people attending a peaceful rally.

So are you saying these people's rights are not important?



You didn't say that, I was referring to the OP. That should have been more clear. I was keeping the whole idea in mind.

I was finally able to see the shorter videos in full. Only chrome would run them without massive pop ups.

There was a kid in a green jacket and backwards hat, I think he pushed the older guy. That was wrong.

I still don't see spitting, but I saw a lot of placing scarves or small pirces of paper on people who were tring to leave and that is wrong.

I see a kid in a hoodie lay on the hood a beige SUV for about 30 seconds and leave- that might have been SS, might have been police. He got right off of it and police seemed more concerned with keeping others away from the vehicles.


+14 more 
posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 12:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: reldra

So you agree with their actions?


I would go about protesting differently. I would not jump on any car. But it doesn;t appear anyone was hurt.


He didn't ask what you would or wouldn't do, he asked if YOU agree with their actions. So do you? I'm interested because of your unwavering crusade to deflect and defend the liberal way of life.



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 01:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: EternalShadow

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: reldra

So you agree with their actions?


I would go about protesting differently. I would not jump on any car. But it doesn;t appear anyone was hurt.


He didn't ask what you would or wouldn't do, he asked if YOU agree with their actions. So do you? I'm interested because of your unwavering crusade to deflect and defend the liberal way of life.


Some of the actions yes, some no.


+20 more 
posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 01:07 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Photo ops? No one said not to come. Jeh JOhnson from DHS was there so I call shenanigans on the do not come part.

A 18 wheeler of things that were needed were also brought. He visited many areas. Was there about 4-5 hours. Then left and felw to another rally.

Hillary sat her as at home and Obama golfed.

Sorry....the sitting POTUS responded to Ferguson sooner that this...



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

The comments section of a ridiculous website.

Stunning really. I actually choked at that comment.


+18 more 
posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

If you agree with part you agree with all. Sorry. That is the way it is. Their actions are always against the weak...the old...the small guy not the bikers or the big guys.

Again, this is simply because there was no bad news and only good news for Trump this week. trump is showing the tactic and it is getting very very old. Very old.

A person jumping on the hood of an escort vehicle should have been arrested immediately.

The Funny thing....Trump was not even there in public....so what are these ignorant people protesting? The right for people to assemble and talk? 1936....
edit on 08pm31pmf0000002016-08-20T13:12:32-05:000132 by matafuchs because: (no reason given)


(post by atrollstalker removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Urantia1111

I wouldn't be so happy..

The death throes of liberalism were years ago, these are the growing pains of unwitting statism.

The result of newer psy-op techniques that will eventually devour most of the political spectrum. It is the birth of what rulers have attempted to achieve for millennia.



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 02:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: reldra

Some might argue that.

Joking aside, you cannot be serious and try to justify burning a flag of YOUR country. It's beyond my mind, why is such idiotic action allowed, and why do those idiots go unharmed.

Our Supreme Court has ruled flag burning to be free speech. It's just a piece of cloth and a Chinese made one at that.


(post by Khaleesi removed for a manners violation)

posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 02:21 PM
link   
*snip*

Take a chill pill, she did not lie, you just dont like like her answer. Now go find proof of what she said was a lie, makes for better threads.
edit on 20-8-2016 by dukeofjive696969 because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-8-2016 by dukeofjive696969 because: (no reason given)

edit on 8/20/2016 by maria_stardust because: Edited out ill-mannered quote.



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: [post=21152456]buster2010
Our Supreme Court has ruled flag burning to be free speech. It's just a piece of cloth and a Chinese made one at that.


Go burn a flag in front of the VFW.
The Supreme Court won't be there to protect your right to free speech.
A soldier probably will. He has done it before even for people who hate him for what he is.

edit on 20-8-2016 by atrollstalker because: No reason. I just like to do that sometimes.


+15 more 
posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 02:33 PM
link   
This is straight up assault, coercion and intimidation—oppression. To the extent that this behaviour is anti-democratic, illiberal and violent, we can safely say there are fascistic elements in these "protests".



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: Khaleesi

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: KTemplar

originally posted by: JAY1980
Ignorance knows no bounds.
The man just got back from helping flood victims to receive this kind of welcome?
Typical...



S&F very good point, while the president is golfing on the Vineyard; Donald Trump had reached out to the victims of the Louisana flooding.



The governor of La asked Obama to wait a week. They weren;t ready for a presidential motorcade.

Trump didn't even tell the Governor he was coming, used up a bunch of officers to escort him and got a couple photo ops.


That is a lie and has been pointed out to you on another thread. Trump used absolutely ZERO local officers. He only had his security detail (SS and his own hired security) . You know this is a lie and you repeat it on multiple threads. YOU ARE A LIAR.


Take a chill pill, she did not lie, you just dont like like her answer. Now go find proof of what she said was a lie, makes for better threads.


Videos prove me correct. NO POLICE. Not one single police officer is seen in any video from the time he hit the tarmac. Only his security detail in casual plain clothes (identified by having earpieces) No gaggle of reporters, just a few local reporters as is evidenced by a lack of adequate sound on videos (no boom mics) No speeches, just meeting people. You can't even hear what he says to those people most of the time because of the lack of professional reporters. If there had been any police presence, I would think you would have seen them on the multitude of personal videos people were taking with their cell phones. The only people seen in uniform were National Guard members that were taking a meal during a break, sitting down inside an area for volunteers. Jeez, you people have so much hate, you are willing to make up crap to fit your agenda. None of us can know for a fact whether Trump was there out of true concern or to make a good impression for his campaign. Either way it doesn't matter. You can choose to believe he did it for campaign purposes and that's fine but you CAN NOT make false claims about police presence.



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 02:40 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

You have a right to burn your own flag on your own property if local zoning laws allow open burning.

Burning a stolen flags, or even your own flag, on public property or on somone else's property is a crime and a public safety hazard.

First ammendment protected free speech does not allow yelling fire in a crowd and it sure as hell does not allow starting fires in a crowd.



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: atrollstalker

It is cheaper to replace some damage at the facility to take place and pay for some medicals bills for assault than to shoot one of these thugs. If they shoot one the whole town riots, the inner city burns down, businesses leave, taxes evaporate.

Remember when the tea party protestors looted, assaulted and burned buildings down? me neither. Now think of the media portrayal of this and the BLM vs the tea party.



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Actually, it is a normal liberal response to those who don't agree with them.
It will remain so until those trying to be politically correct get fed up.
When they do, people will be arrested, convicted, and at a young age, ruin their life.
That is why Trump doesn't ask the young troublemakers at his events get arrested.
He has said, publicly at a rally I attended, that he doesn't want to ruin their life at such an early age.
Me, on the other hand think we could use a few more people in the fast food or lawn service industry.



posted on Aug, 20 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Khaleesi

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: Khaleesi

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: KTemplar

originally posted by: JAY1980
Ignorance knows no bounds.
The man just got back from helping flood victims to receive this kind of welcome?
Typical...



S&F very good point, while the president is golfing on the Vineyard; Donald Trump had reached out to the victims of the Louisana flooding.



The governor of La asked Obama to wait a week. They weren;t ready for a presidential motorcade.

Trump didn't even tell the Governor he was coming, used up a bunch of officers to escort him and got a couple photo ops.


That is a lie and has been pointed out to you on another thread. Trump used absolutely ZERO local officers. He only had his security detail (SS and his own hired security) . You know this is a lie and you repeat it on multiple threads. YOU ARE A LIAR.


Take a chill pill, she did not lie, you just dont like like her answer. Now go find proof of what she said was a lie, makes for better threads.


Videos prove me correct. NO POLICE. Not one single police officer is seen in any video from the time he hit the tarmac. Only his security detail in casual plain clothes (identified by having earpieces) No gaggle of reporters, just a few local reporters as is evidenced by a lack of adequate sound on videos (no boom mics) No speeches, just meeting people. You can't even hear what he says to those people most of the time because of the lack of professional reporters. If there had been any police presence, I would think you would have seen them on the multitude of personal videos people were taking with their cell phones. The only people seen in uniform were National Guard members that were taking a meal during a break, sitting down inside an area for volunteers. Jeez, you people have so much hate, you are willing to make up crap to fit your agenda. None of us can know for a fact whether Trump was there out of true concern or to make a good impression for his campaign. Either way it doesn't matter. You can choose to believe he did it for campaign purposes and that's fine but you CAN NOT make false claims about police presence.


Its funny how you guys are fast with words like trigger and hate, and its you guys who cry online daily, also proof is more
Than a video found on youtube, or a bunch of people on a web site crying foul.

Dont get me wrong i love you guys, reminds me there still people who believe anything there told.
edit on 20-8-2016 by dukeofjive696969 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
65
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join