Trumps Power Play

Ok, now a lot of this is just now forming in my head, so I hope it comes across as coherent......


Ok so trumps campaign has been a mess. He is going against a horrible canidate in Hillary and would have walked to victory if he just shut up.


Well there are some interesting factors involving the circumstances of trumps run.


1) his failed contract negotiations with the "Apprentice." Appearantly it is claimed by Micheal Moore that trumps run was a negotiating tactic. He expected to lose but raise his name recognition and own the ratings when they returned the next season.


2) He just hired 2 big wig media power players and a giant in roger ailes. He hired 2 monsters in Ailes and the brietbart heir, but a really smart "face of the campaign" in his new manager. Even Ben Shapiro a hard right radio host says brietbart has gone "white nationalist" under Trumps new chairman.

3) roger stone was just hired on as well. Who is the least trustworthy conspiracy person on the planet.


3) the Russian connection. Ivanka vacationing with putins regular girlfriend?!?! Manifort is on the payroll of Russian oil czars and possibly under unverstigation....


4) The wiki leaks connection.... Russia is obviously feeding assange information and time tables in a gambit to get a pro Russian Trump elected. Which I am not reall against as I think the Cold War propaganda was just that. But it is unheard of in American politics.

5) Trumps not spending money... He hasn't bought one ad or reserved any space, and the price goes up the closer to date you book them.



One thing I can think of has been, this is all a move to create a media giant to rival and/or crush Fox News and everyone else. He plans on losing and claiming he was robbed. Then dumping the money into that? Maybe he thinks he can transfer his supporters over to consumers?



I really have no clue, but I bet all these things line up when we look back later.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

One thing I can think of has been, this is all a move to create a media giant to rival and/or crush Fox News and everyone else. He plans on losing and claiming he was robbed. Then dumping the money into that? Maybe he thinks he can transfer his supporters over to consumers?

I don't think there is any evidence of this, and I think such theorizing is being used to delegitimize Trump's campaign.

Ivanka has been friends with Putin's rumoured girlfriend Wendy Wing since when she was dating Rupert Murdoch.

Trump has recently bought ad time.

Roger Stone is not employed by the Trump campaign.

Manifort runs a business, and that business is lobbying, of which he has had many clients throughout the world.

Trump has spent millions.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

He expected to lose but raise his name recognition and own the ratings when they returned the next season.

Whether or not he had hopes to get a better deal for the Apprentice, Trump has always been in the game of his own BRAND. He buys airlines just to put his name on the jets. He buys buildings just to put his name on the outside. Casinos, same thing. He started that fake University just to call it Trump. If little else, Trump has learned how the American public are suckers for a 'name brand product. (and that is a big, big truth). So win or lose, he will have increased his Brand.

One thing I can think of has been, this is all a move to create a media giant to rival and/or crush Fox News and everyone else. He plans on losing and claiming he was robbed. Then dumping the money into that? Maybe he thinks he can transfer his supporters over to consumers?

Yeah, that Ailes and Briethbart connection does suggest a new and very lucrative media empire.
"The Trumpet of Truth". OMG, money by the bag full.
Your last sentence, " Maybe he thinks he can transfer his supporters over to consumers?" Oh man, you have it there. I doubt that the rest of us are nothing more to him then consumers. He is like a modern, bigger than life, swaggering PT Barnum. You know him? He was the owner of Barnum and Baily circus's and the guy that came up with the line, "there's a sucker born every minute". And he is hoping that most of them vote for him. And they will, except for the suckers who vote for Clinton.

You and I have different definitions of the word "mess"

Rasmussen - Clinton leads by 2% (inside the margin of error)
www.rasmussenreports.com...

LA Times - Clinton leads by .6% (inside the margin of error)
graphics.latimes.com...

Don't let facts get in the way....

NEVER forget that a silent majority exists which is voting for trump that saw my candidate Ben Carson lose to him easily and that's to say nothing for the other three or four front runners which mainstream polls all had stomping Donald…

I can't wait for the debates.....i'm more excited about the debates and I would be for a Cowboys Super Bowl...

-Christosteorme

1) his failed contract negotiations with the "Apprentice." Appearantly it is claimed by Micheal Moore that trumps run was a negotiating tactic. He expected to lose but raise his name recognition and own the ratings when they returned the next season.


One cannot be on TV if you are running for political office.


2) He just hired 2 big wig media power players and a giant in roger ailes. He hired 2 monsters in Ailes and the brietbart heir, but a really smart "face of the campaign" in his new manager. Even Ben Shapiro a hard right radio host says brietbart has gone "white nationalist" under Trumps new chairman.

Ben Shapiro is ex-brietbart, it didn't end well. That like saying someone ex is saying bad things about you.

3) roger stone was just hired on as well. Who is the least trustworthy conspiracy person on the planet.

Have you read the DNC leaks?



3) the Russian connection. Ivanka vacationing with putins regular girlfriend?!?! Manifort is on the payroll of Russian oil czars and possibly under unverstigation....

Have you read Clinton Cash??? If what they are saying about Manifort is true, that's like arresting the jay walker, when Hillary is standing beside him with blood running down her hands on the bags of money she's holding.

Not saying Manifort should not be investigated, but if one is online complaining about Manifort and says nothing about Hillary personally, I would think they are getting paid.

4) The wiki leaks connection.... Russia is obviously feeding assange information and time tables in a gambit to get a pro Russian Trump elected. Which I am not reall against as I think the Cold War propaganda was just that. But it is unheard of in American politics.

Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks, the only people saying that are the DNC and their shills. Wikileaks people laugh at people who think Russia did it.



5) Trumps not spending money... He hasn't bought one ad or reserved any space, and the price goes up the closer to date you book them.

He is spending money, campaign offices are not free. He's not spending establishment money like Jeb and Hillary. Trump does one tweet and gets so much free advertising, why would you put money out there when you get better traction for free

he more than likely will be the face breitbart tv when it launches next year.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: JoshuaCox

One thing I can think of has been, this is all a move to create a media giant to rival and/or crush Fox News and everyone else. He plans on losing and claiming he was robbed. Then dumping the money into that? Maybe he thinks he can transfer his supporters over to consumers?

I don't think there is any evidence of this, and I think such theorizing is being used to delegitimize Trump's campaign.

Ivanka has been friends with Putin's rumoured girlfriend Wendy Wing since when she was dating Rupert Murdoch.

Trump has recently bought ad time.

Roger Stone is not employed by the Trump campaign.

Manifort runs a business, and that business is lobbying, of which he has had many clients throughout the world.

Trump has spent millions.

Let me add to that:

Ivanka's friend, Wendy, denies the rumor and says she has "never met Putin."

a reply to: Christosterone



Trump's supporters are neither the majority, nor silent. Trump will never debate. He has no idea how.

a reply to: Christosterone

I can't wait for the debates.....i'm more excited about the debates and I would be for a Cowboys Super Bowl...

Trump will never debate Clinton. He will come up with some lame chicken**** excuse, never take responsibility and blame the media. That's his usual MO and I don't expect it to change.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: JoshuaCox

One thing I can think of has been, this is all a move to create a media giant to rival and/or crush Fox News and everyone else. He plans on losing and claiming he was robbed. Then dumping the money into that? Maybe he thinks he can transfer his supporters over to consumers?

I don't think there is any evidence of this, and I think such theorizing is being used to delegitimize Trump's campaign.

Ivanka has been friends with Putin's rumoured girlfriend Wendy Wing since when she was dating Rupert Murdoch.

Trump has recently bought ad time.

Roger Stone is not employed by the Trump campaign.

Manifort runs a business, and that business is lobbying, of which he has had many clients throughout the world.

Trump has spent millions.

If ANY OF THOSE things were true of a democrat they would be traitors.