It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Motherlode: Clinton Foundation Hacked?

page: 7
83
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 09:18 AM
link   

###Attention please###



The thread's topic is not each other; please stay on topic.

Don't reply to this post.




posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 09:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
Black mail material for when she becomes president. Someone will control her I'm sure.


If not already...



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 09:45 AM
link   
Let's just wait and see... I don't think we'll see anything soon IF a hack has taken place... it's more likely to be released closer to November. I do believe though that a lot more is going to come out on both sides before people go to the polls.



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: odinsway


It's daylight now and it's not even mentioned . By anyone.
What do you suppose the hold up is. It should be all over the internet and MSM today...and for days to come.
edit on 8182016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
So has anything been released or are we jumping for joy for absolutely no reason whatsoever?
Guccifer is holding it...oh wait...



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
There you have it folks.
Discussing the possibilities that might arise here equals... "Going completely Ape#." at least in some members minds.

They don't remember that the DNC leaks were preceded by an announcement that the DNC had been hacked.


The DNC made the announcement about the hacks too.
edit on 8182016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Yeah but the claim was made that it would be all over the internet and MSM today.
And there isn't even a whisper.



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.




I recall a DNC functionary illegally monitoring Newt Gingrich's cell phone and releasing the tape. Instead of being outraged over the (illegal) invasion of privacy the media establishment wet themselves trashing Gingrich for actually trying to achieve something political.



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
OP NOTE:
Please let's not get distracted by tactics and terminology designed to deflect the discussion away from it's crux.
Individual speculation based upon information delivered through reliable sources is not disingenuous, but encouraged here.

the speculation isn't based on indisputable information obtained from a reliable source. None of the speculation isbased on anything other than an idea. It's a list of hopes and wishes.
Since there isn't even confirmation that a hack took place.



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

Yeah but the claim was made that it would be all over the internet and MSM today.
And there isn't even a whisper.

Many major news outlets have carried the story today.

Google 'clinton foundation hacked' and limit to last 24hrs... there are currently 12 pages of results including Reuters, NY Post, Washington Times, Fox, DailyMail, Daily Caller, Politico, TheHill, DailyBeast, Breitbart... I think what you mean is that CNN and MSNBC didn't cover it which would explain why you have not seen anything.



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

When? is the big question.

Do they want to just damage Hilary, or do they want to damage America?

Maybe they want the latter so they're waiting until she's elected.


edit on 18-8-2016 by McGinty because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Guccifer is holding it...oh wait...


You mean Guccifer 2.0




posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Guccifer is holding it...oh wait...


You mean Guccifer 2.0




They have to make stabs at Guccifer since he is the one to thank for outing Hillary's private 'super-secure' email server.... in a bathroom!



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:50 PM
link   
why is everyone so worried? The DNC hack occurred at least 45 days before it was released. It's all about timing!
edit on 8/18/2016 by carewemust because: Google voice recognition sucks!



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
why is everyone so worried? The DNC had occurred at least 45 days before it was released. It's all about timing!

Yeah, but imagine being a Hillary supporter, having to wait until late October for the really big shoe to drop.



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

I don't wish to see individual Hillary supporters supper, but I want to see mainstream media Talking Heads have ulcers and lots of uncomfortable moments between now and then.



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: SudoNim
So its ok to hack all non-profit corporations then?


I wouldn't say all. If they are run by a corrupt career politician who makes a habit of destroying classified material and being treated as above the law I'll make an exception.



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 02:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

Yeah but the claim was made that it would be all over the internet and MSM today.
And there isn't even a whisper.

Many major news outlets have carried the story today.

Google 'clinton foundation hacked' and limit to last 24hrs... there are currently 12 pages of results including Reuters, NY Post, Washington Times, Fox, DailyMail, Daily Caller, Politico, TheHill, DailyBeast, Breitbart... I think what you mean is that CNN and MSNBC didn't cover it which would explain why you have not seen anything.


thehill.com...


The Hill says not hacked.

Politico says not hacked

www.politico.com...

Maybe we just needed to give it some time.
edit on 8182016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

Yeah but the claim was made that it would be all over the internet and MSM today.
And there isn't even a whisper.

Many major news outlets have carried the story today.

Google 'clinton foundation hacked' and limit to last 24hrs... there are currently 12 pages of results including Reuters, NY Post, Washington Times, Fox, DailyMail, Daily Caller, Politico, TheHill, DailyBeast, Breitbart... I think what you mean is that CNN and MSNBC didn't cover it which would explain why you have not seen anything.


thehill.com...


The Hill says not hacked.


Indeed.. there are many articles about this today across various media outlets.
By the way - the Hill does not say 'not hacked'. They headline with a Clinton Foundation source that said that (at least they said there was no evidence of a hack). The Hill story details the same information as all the other sources and is the same story referenced by the OP, who correctly said it would be media news today.

Same for Politico - they headline a sources' reaction to the same story.
edit on 18/8/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

thehill.com...


The Hill says not hacked.

Politico says not hacked

www.politico.com...

Maybe we just needed to give it some time.



A report that the Clinton Foundation was hacked is incorrect, according to a source close to the organization.






top topics



 
83
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join