It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rand Paul On Board to Indict Hillary Clinton, "followed by a prison sentence"

page: 3
80
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:
+6 more 
posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Hahaha!

Even the FBI director said the she lied...I'm sorry we can't get your cult leader to admit that she lied, because it seems you only trust her




posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:20 AM
link   
Indict her for what? You can't just toss people in prison for nothing more than disliking them.

You have to have evidence that a crime has been committed, and I'm not talking about that email nonsense. That has been laid to rest.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Bone75

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Its all happening, should be any day now, it wasn't yesterday, wont be today, might be tomorrow, next week, or next month, na i bet you its finally going to happen next year.


It'll be the same day as the end times that's always around the corner.


We should watch what we write, these people are very sensitive, we wouldn't want to offend anyone, those poor souls.


Is that why you got rid of your rebel flag avatar?


I'm 100% sure i never had a rebel flag as an avatar, i think you might have replied to the wrong person.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz
it seems like there is a polar shift happening, the more Clinton gets berated with accusations and inquisitions, the more polls she seems to be leading and the more ads her camp releases.
before it was like, the dumber the things trump said, the more people would flock behind him to be 'entertained'. not so much so now.

the media manipulation by either party and of the general population is unprecedented.




Really? No. Accusations and implications against HRC are not the sort that will drive poll numbers up. Nothing like Trumps media interpreted "gaffs". The lefties press have avoided any clear look at true juxtaposition between the candidates and have tried this blurring of the lines, moral equivalent game.

And think back last election is was the lefty press peddling old gray headed white males and Tea Party crazy misrepresentations to float some progressive plan and it didn't work. Now we have some old white lady career politician and why you would think it was Marry Poppins.
edit on 13-8-2016 by Logarock because: n



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: Bone75

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Its all happening, should be any day now, it wasn't yesterday, wont be today, might be tomorrow, next week, or next month, na i bet you its finally going to happen next year.


It'll be the same day as the end times that's always around the corner.


We should watch what we write, these people are very sensitive, we wouldn't want to offend anyone, those poor souls.


Is that why you got rid of your rebel flag avatar?


I'm 100% sure i never had a rebel flag as an avatar, i think you might have replied to the wrong person.


Yep, you're definitely a Democrat.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
Indict her for what? You can't just toss people in prison for nothing more than disliking them.

You have to have evidence that a crime has been committed, and I'm not talking about that email nonsense. That has been laid to rest.


Ok, I'll play...
Clinton crimes for 200, Alex...
What is perjury?

Enjoy the video daily double!


-Christosterone
edit on 13-8-2016 by Christosterone because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:43 AM
link   






posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

If it is just that simple, why haven't charges been filed? Let me answer that: It's not that simple.

You would have to prove that she intentionally lied in order to mislead. Her lawyers could easily say that she spoke truthfully, but was factually wrong. Remember, she was not the one that went through the emails. Her lawyers did.

A perjury charge would never stick and they know it. Why you guys can't seem to understand something so fricken' elementary is beyond me.

Perhaps your partisanship clouds your thinking.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Is THAT what he's doing?

Wow ... you've got a lot of posts in this thread. Is it important to you or are you trying to derail it? -Chuckle

If Rand Paul thinks Hillary should go to jail ... she probably should.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Snarl



If Rand Paul thinks Hillary should go to jail ... she probably should.


That makes no sense. That is not how the American justice system works.


+1 more 
posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Christosterone

If it is just that simple, why haven't charges been filed? Let me answer that: It's not that simple.

You would have to prove that she intentionally lied in order to mislead. Her lawyers could easily say that she spoke truthfully, but was factually wrong.


As is typical with the moral relativist you see only shades of grey...no black or white, good or evil, right or wrong…

You will go through mental hoopla hoops convincing yourself the person with whom you entrust your support with a religious fervor is infallible...

Progessivism in its current manifestation as merely an extension of the state is so rapt by Hillary deus they cannot see her faults...

Stalinists, Maoists, Islamists, inquisition era Christians and a multitude of other blind followers over the expanse of human history parallel this cultish fervor you and your ilk feel towards your autocrat...

And it is only through more relativism that you can adequately defend[to your own conscience] such a indefensible set of actions...

If you do not see perjury in that clip then I cannot speak to you anymore regarding this...
Nor the color of the sky, nor the inherent state of water at room temperature… Spoiler alert: it is wet...

Good luck with your belief system and long live the infallible Queen!!!

-Christosterone



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Pladuim
See. This is what I'm talking about. Just yell at me that I'm wrong and then insert some snippy remark. No evidence. No proof of what you are talking about. Sure I could easily refute what you just said, but why should I? You don't care about my opinion anyways. You're just indignant that I don't agree with you.


I applaud you for (gasp) excercising your fundamental right as an American to believe and say whatever you damn well please.

I can't stand Hillary Clinton, but am I going to go on a trolling spree to any/every Clinton supporter I meet? Am I going to vehemently insist on them being a paid government operative who is "correcting the record?"

Of course not - why are other ATS members succumbing to this social media #?

This website has veered so far away from what it was when I had originally signed up. I mean, there were ridiculous and baseless conspiracies on the regular (Obama birther, for instance) - but people were generally cordial to one another.

Now? This place is a joke. Every thread is derailed by "Crooked Hillary," jabs. It's become the new "Obummer." Really, really have lost sight as to why I bother with ATS at all anymore.

Where many members claim to be proponents of things such as "freedom, equality, Justice, truth," they rally behind media messiahs who stand for the exact opposite - and it transcends the third grade "my team is better than your team!," theatrics.


+1 more 
posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Here you go, she lied to congress. So, your comments have been proven wrong straight from the FBI. This is a proven fact, so yea, I probably don't care about your opinion, you can't refute that.

Go ahead, pull your fingers out of your ears, quit singing the la la la song, refute all you want if you can.

www.youtube.com...

Pladuim



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

Nice rant.

You really don't understand the laws, do you?



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Bone75

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: Bone75

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Its all happening, should be any day now, it wasn't yesterday, wont be today, might be tomorrow, next week, or next month, na i bet you its finally going to happen next year.


It'll be the same day as the end times that's always around the corner.


We should watch what we write, these people are very sensitive, we wouldn't want to offend anyone, those poor souls.


Is that why you got rid of your rebel flag avatar?


I'm 100% sure i never had a rebel flag as an avatar, i think you might have replied to the wrong person.


Yep, you're definitely a Democrat.


Nope i vote green party or ndp which is more or less socialist parties, better luck next time.
edit on 13-8-2016 by dukeofjive696969 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Christosterone

If it is just that simple, why haven't charges been filed? Let me answer that: It's not that simple.

You would have to prove that she intentionally lied in order to mislead. Her lawyers could easily say that she spoke truthfully, but was factually wrong. Remember, she was not the one that went through the emails. Her lawyers did.




OK so ah what? Her lawyers went through the emails.

Anyway all that needs to be demonstrated is that she set up illegal bypass and veracity of "truthfulness" goes out the window. You cant really be factually wrong but truthful in a case like this and where you can its really not an elevation of guilt but a change in the degree of guilt.

Lets see "truthful but factually wrong"..........means.....our government is going down into a sh*t hole.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:04 AM
link   
I guess he thinks the stink of another failed Presidential run has finally subsided.

Sad that he has nothing productive to offer, as none of the Republlicans do, only more "Get Hillary" garbage.

What about jobs? trade deficits? income inequality? effects of climate change (whatever "the cause"), national infrastructure, immigration, terrorism, ... you know, something meaningful?

Nah. Let's continue to fantasize about that eventual Hillary "rape" (as one description made clear) that some of you have been clamorring for these last 25 or so years ... that'll teach her. Dang uppity woman.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: AmericanRealist

This man should have been the Republicans nominee but conservatives screwed up and gave us Trump.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Logarock

Again, you obviously don't understand perjury.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
You can't just toss people in prison for nothing more than disliking them.


Hate to rain on your parade, but yes you can. Just throw her in prison, there is no need for trial.

Kalief Browder, Held at Rikers Island for 3 Years Without Trial, Commits Suicide
www.nytimes.com...



new topics

top topics



 
80
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join