Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory

a reply to: Konduit

Whatever you gotta tell yourself to help you sleep at night, guy.

a reply to: Konduit

Yes. They don't need to rig polls. And the emails from the DNC didn't show any flipping fraud eiither so you can just can that. The emails showed favoritism. Big flipping deal. Too bad for Bernie supporters that they all liked Hillary more. You know the one who was the real democratic candidate? Not the socialist new comer????
Again too bad. But don't lie and say ANY of the emails suggested any kind of fraud or rigging. That's total bull and anyone with even half a brain knows it.

You can try to fool yourself that he has even a slight chance but it's over for trump.and it's his own doing not the DNC or Hillary or the media. It's him shooting holes in his own boat. It's him and his uncontrollable mouth.

Better to see the truth now.

This is just pathetic.

Trump will win by a landslide because he has more likes on Facebook and followers on Twitter? LOL. What a remarkably sound methodology!

1. Facebook likes and Twitter followers can be easily bought and otherwise manipulated (I have three Twitter accounts myself). Likes and followers can also be bought.
2. Following a user on social media doesn't signify support.
3. Social media accounts don't have to be from the U.S.
4. Social media accounts don't have to be operated by adults.
5. Older folks are far less likely to have social media accounts.
6. It's a lot easier to click "Like" or "Follow" than it is to go out and vote.
7. How many Likes/Followers did these accounts have before election season started?
8. Lot's of folks will vote for a candidate that they won't like or follow on social media, even if they have social media accounts.

That's just a few points off the top of my head. Katy Perry has like 92 million followers. Clearly she should be the next President of the United States of America!

I know it's become cliched to say but really, welcome to Idiocracy.

a reply to: Sillyolme

See you are still doing it wrong. There is no convincing these people of reality. If you are SO delusional that you have to rely on likes on Facebook (wait didn't Republicans hate Zuckerburg?) and follows on Twitter to believe your narrative, there is no convincing you with evidence, yelling, reasoning, or common sense. It's probably just best to step out of the way at this point and let them bloody their own nose.

originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: Sillyolme

Thank you for Correcting The Record

The thing about correct the record is....Well they're correct. The bull stops there.

a reply to: LifeMode

Hmmm Richard Nixon lost to Kennedy then served two terms afterward.
Grover Cleveland won, then lost then won again.
John Adams ran twice lost the first time.
Andrew Jackson too.
Hillary was a candidate for nominee. There have been many who ran in primaries but lost only to come back again and sometimes again.
And Hillary is already going down in the history books. History, where you may want to start your next " I came up with this all on my own" research.

I am afraid there actually are a TON of zombies who go by everything the MSM says.

A lot of people truly do believe Trump is an evil racist, woman hating, islamaphobic wannabe dictator, and that Hillary will be ok because she is an experienced politician.

It sucks, I would much rather take a chance with Trump.

Even though part of me believes he might be acting, working with Hillary to hand her the election in the end.....

I just wish I could move to some tropical island in the middle of nowhere.....I can't though so I am doomed to ride this madness out..

a reply to: Sillyolme

I agree that she's going down in history, same with the US if she wins.

Dennis Michael Lynch had his mic cut off and was taken off the air after he called out his network for taking away his editorial discretion.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Keep towing the line bud.

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Sillyolme

I agree that she's going down in history, same with the US if she wins.

Spare me.

People said the same thing when Obama was elected, twice, and we're still here doing just fine.

I don't know what it is, but politics seems to turn people in to drama queens. You guys need to get a fricken' grip, and I'm not talking about clutching your pearls.

Everyone is aware that this 'news' (Trump winning on social media) emanates from Paul Manafort's office, right? This ATS thread is just the lame repetition of a Trump campaign claim.

a reply to: Astyanax

It's amazing how many people sit in front of a computer but won't take 5 seconds to use a search engine to verify information for themselves.

a reply to: introvert

Yea we are sure that if she is elected she will certainly tighten up her act, stop selling influence, start using security protocol ect.

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Keep towing the line bud.

Blah blah blah. What exactly do you think it is that you're doing fanboy?

a reply to: Konduit

Yes, I was wondering how the people swallowing this rubbish could be so credulous. But I guess if they weren't Brooklyn Bridge buyers they wouldn't have fallen for Donny Bozo in the first place.

Again like i posted earlier, trump fans are so insecure that they need to post daily threads about how great he is , also that he is miss understood.

Propaganda 101 right here my friends.

Oh and the op clearly stated in one of his threads that he likes to troll so is threads end up on the main page.

Hook line and sinker

originally posted by: 711117
These numbers you've presented has nothing to do with polls; they show that Trump is a more interesting character and people are interested with what he says, but that interest is not 1 sided in his favour. Someone not interested in American politics would be much more likely to watch a Trump live stream than a Hillary one because people want to hear him say something crazy or diss someone up in real time. People that don't like him follow him on twitter just to see what he's going to say next. All around the world people are tuning in to hear what the man's saying because of all the hype that surrounds him, and this is what those stats say, not that he's ahead in the polls

I say the same about folks who attend his rallys. How many people are just there because it's free local entertainment and they want to see what he will say next.

a reply to: theantediluvian

I guess we're all guilty of it, aren't we?

But it doesn't hurt to look for a narrative outside of MSM talking points, you should try it sometime.

a reply to: iTruthSeeker

Bull. The polls are not skewed. This Facebook thing only shows how very desperate trump supporters are getting because he's throwing the election. He's throwing it. He opens his mouth and people run the other way.
Don't blame anyone or anything but him. He's doing this all on his own. All on his own...