It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: klassless
Sorry why don't you try posting links to the original articles, because I HAVE read them and they don't indicate what you'd have everyone believe...
Jaden
originally posted by: klassless
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
Pics or it did happen
There should if this was a controlled experiment that failed be some weather related or aviation data at least letting other aviation craft know to avoid experiment area. If there is not... Why?
No pics. Read the original newspaper accounts, as good as it gets. It was a secret military project at trying to stay ahead of the Russians. Remember, cold war.
originally posted by: ebeman
a reply to: klassless
While you readily admit to being a UFO debunker, it still doesn't excuse how you use the standard debunker mantra of grabbing any opportunity to ridicule or demean the integrity of another person -- who you may or may not personally be acquainted with.
You refer to a Huffington Post story as "the usual cock-and-bull promotion article by Lee Speigel who was instrumental in my attending the UN UFO day back in 1978. Lee is a believer and he has learned that the truth is not as profitable as a (GIANT!) white lie."
For general readers, those were two quite loaded sentences.
First, you imply that Speigel normally writes "cock-and-bull promotion articles." Really? Is that true? I've read his pieces and don't get the impression he's that kind of writer. Yet, you don't hesitate to debunk what he writes. And I'll bet readers would like to know how, exactly, was Speigel instrumental in your showing up at the UN all those years ago. It would be helpful to all of us here to know more about that day and to get your thoughts about what happened.
In 1978, in another early attempt at UFO disclosure, but this time on a world stage, Speigel became the only person in history to produce a major presentation on UFOs at the United Nations. Under the sponsorship of Grenada, he brought together leading military and scientific experts who urged world leaders to establish an international UFO study panel.
Then, you say Speigel is a believer...well, a believer in what? What are you claiming he's a believer of? If you know, please share it with us so we can understand. And when you say he's learned the truth is not as profitable as a GIANT white lie, what does that mean? Please inform us as to what giant white lie Speigel has told, or is currently telling.
I remembered that I had done three interviews [about Roswell] that were set up for me in 1980 by nuclear physicist Stan Friedman,” Speigel said. “I thought ‘Why don’t I begin my presentation in Roswell with sound bites on these three guys and really nail the whole reason why we’re in Roswell.”
I'd be happier if he hadn't polluted so many naïve young minds along the way.
It's one thing to be a skeptic or debunker and feel like it's OK to push your opinions out there. But when you don't further explain what you mean, it almost sounds as though your statements stem from a totally uninformed point of view. It's as if you haven't actually done any research on the people (in this case, Speigel) who you attempt to bring to their knees, all in the name of keeping true to that standard debunker's mantra I mentioned earlier.
]Please give us more info. Don't just throw assumptions and/or accusations around if you don't know for sure that they're well founded.
originally posted by: seattlerat
a reply to: klassless
Just a couple of nights ago I listened to a podcast that touched on this very issue. The fellows who host the show do a pretty good job of viewing both sides of the UFO coin. They may not have as much experience or knowledge as some (like yourself) with this topic, but they seem to come to a similar conclusion that the entire Roswell "story" is disinformation by the US Military.
Here is a link to the podcast for those who might be interested: Magical Mystery Media Podcast #1 Nazis, Man-Made UFOs, and Mirage Men
Intro to the podcast:
What if someone told you that most – maybe all – of the biggest UFO stories of the last few decades were carefully crafted lies? And what if that same someone told you that those lies were a deliberately manufactured disinformation campaign directed by elements within the government to steer you away from the truth: the UFOs are us. Would you believe it? If you’ve been a follower of the UFO phenomenon for any length of time, you’d probably answer that with a dogmatic cry of: No Way! However, if you’re being honest with yourself, then you’ll probably come to the uncomfortable realization that much of what you’ve been told is bull#. Pissed off? You should be. Especially if you’ve been the target of such a campaign (paging Paul Bennewitz), and you’ve dedicated your whole life trying to uncover the truth. Or whatever that is.
I have listened to most of the Podcast UFO & Open Mind UFO Radio episodes, but have found them to be lacking in taking a skeptical view... the guys on Magical Media don't have this problem and I recommend their other episodes (not all UFO related) as well.
As for my own view- the more I learn the less I believe this was an event that included "actual extraterrestrial anythings". The sequence and timing of multiple UFO related events and their context with other historical occurrences leads me to believe that this was all propaganda and disinformation designed to hide HUMAN MILITARY TECHNOLOGY. I say this with sadness, because I wanted to continue believing in J-Rod, the Flux-Liner, Memory Metal, etc.
I do not discount the possibility of alien visitation either past or present, but I find it difficult to believe that they would come all this way through the most hazardous of conditions we know of, only to crash in the desert next to a military base hosting the tip-top most TOP SECRET stuff ever thunk up.
Wouldn't they (the aliens) have considered this possibility and ensured that their craft was destroyed or was Gary Powers their pilot? (Not sure if Bridge of Spies accurately portrayed the U-2 incident, but what the heck).
On April 9, 1946, the Council of Ministers of the USSR adopted the resolution on creation of Design Office#11 (KB-11) to develop an atomic bomb.
Project Mogul (sometimes referred to as Operation Mogul) was a top secret project by the US Army Air Forces involving microphones flown on high-altitude balloons, whose primary purpose was long-distance detection of sound waves generated by Soviet atomic bomb tests. The project was carried out from 1947 until early 1949. The project was moderately successful, but was very expensive and was superseded by a network of seismic detectors and air sampling for fallout, which were cheaper, more reliable, and easier to deploy and operate
Constant-altitude-control and polyethylene balloons were the two major innovations of Project Mogul.
In the summer of 1947 a Project Mogul balloon crashed in the desert near Roswell, New Mexico. The subsequent military cover-up of the true nature of the balloon and burgeoning conspiracy theories from UFO enthusiasts led to a celebrated "UFO" incident.[2]
originally posted by: seattlerat
a reply to: humanoidlord
Klassless, I appreciate your taking the time to post your thoughts on this topic- AND, welcome to ATS. Would you be so kind as to elaborate on your experience in Washington D.C. with the Roswell N.M. crash debris? I look forward to your future posts.
Thanks in advance!
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
originally posted by: klassless
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
Pics or it did happen
There should if this was a controlled experiment that failed be some weather related or aviation data at least letting other aviation craft know to avoid experiment area. If there is not... Why?
No pics. Read the original newspaper accounts, as good as it gets. It was a secret military project at trying to stay ahead of the Russians. Remember, cold war.
Then certainly there should be some releasable data related to said projects on that day. Releasable data to close the argument, yet none presented?
originally posted by: shawmanfromny
The balloon which held it up, if that was how it worked, must have been about 12 feet long, he felt, measuring the distance by the size of the room in which he sat. The rubber was smoky gray in color and scattered over an area about 200 yards in diameter."
When the debris was gathered up the tinfoil, paper, tape, and sticks made a bundle about three feet long and 7 or 8 inches thick, while the rubber made a bundle about 18 or 20 inches long and about 8 inches thick. In all, he estimated, the entire lot would have weighed maybe five pounds.
There was no sign of any metal in the area which might have been used for an engine and no sign of any propellers of any kind, although at least one paper fin had been glued onto some of the tinfoil.
No strings or wire were to be found but there were some eyelets in the paper to indicate that some sort of attachment may have been used.
But why couldn't Brazel and the Proctors burn or cut the material? Charles Moore, 74, a feisty physicist who served as the chief engineer for Project Mogul, has a more down-to-earth explanation than wondrous alien technology. "Some of the balsa wood was soaked in glue, like Elmer's glue," he says. "It's a casein product [a protein derived from milk] that just won't burn at all." ... adds that the glue made the wood "a little bit stiffer and less easy to dent than ordinary balsa."
Albert Trakowski, head of top-secret Project Mogul, "This won't lay it to rest. People believe what they want to believe in." Truer words were never spoken with Congressman Schiff being a prime example and it's been so since the '80s.
So here is an article aimed at the general populace and instead of starting with the truth, they show you instead a photo of a flying saucer cementing in readers' heads a prelude to a disappointment.
Whenever possible stick to the source of the news, there's probably more truth in it than the embellishments to come.
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
originally posted by: shawmanfromny
Here's part of the problem - You have people like Kevin Randle or Stanton Friedman that do the thinking for you and that you refer to rather than applying your own common sense, logic, and research. I'll give an example. Kevin Randle acknowledges what Mac Brazel says in the newspaper article, but his main focus is Brazels comment: "I am sure that what I found was not any weather observation balloon."
And of course we know now that when he quotes Brazel, he is quoting an old man whose mind has been affected by the deterioration of memory. This is what Pflock found when he interviewed almost everybody that was present in 1947. The sudden fame and possible financial renumeration helps to sway an already weakened mind.
There is only one author that one can trust to give you the facts on this case and that's Karl T. Pflock. Every other author offers less or different "facts".
My brother-in-law is Lou Jawitz, a retired award-winning professional photographer. In 2003 he was commissioned by Popular Mechanics to go to the National Archives and Records Administration complex at College Park, MD, about a half-hour drive from Wash., DC, to photograph the remains of the Mogul balloon train that "crashed" on the Foster ranch near Roswell.
Then certainly there should be some releasable data related to said projects on that day. Releasable data to close the argument, yet none presented?
originally posted by: seattlerat
a reply to: klassless
Thank you for relating that experience- what an exciting day that must have been. I appreciate the link to the magazine article, as well.
I keep hearing from other members about all this other evidence that supports an "alien spaceship" having crashed, but I haven't seen/heard anything other than anecdotal testimony from people who may (or may not) have been coached on what to say. Back in those days, I'm pretty sure that most Americans did what their government officials asked them to do/say without thinking twice- especially in small close-knit military base towns.
It doesn't seem far fetched (to me) that any potential witnesses to classified stuff/events (such as a Mogul Weather Balloon debris field), might have been given specific instructions on what to say and what not to say regarding what they may have seen, and may have also been given very specific threats/warnings about what might happen if they did not follow these instructions.
Off Topic: from the magazine containing the article/photos of the Roswell Debris towards the end I found a very helpful guide: How to Foil an Alien Abduction - I have printed out this important tutorial and super-glued it to the windshield of my vehicle for worst-case scenarios. I have also added an extra layer of foil to my pith-helmet.
originally posted by: fleabit
So, klassless, what is your opinion on the book Crash at Corona? Curious what you thought about. Please share your opinion, thanks!
I had already gotten sick of his bs as he did not have one questioning bone in his body.
Friedman was employed for 14 years as a nuclear physicist 1956-1970. Friedman left full-time employment as a physicist in 1970 to pursue the scientific investigation of UFO's.
originally posted by: klassless
And of course we know now that when he quotes Brazel, he is quoting an old man whose mind has been affected by the deterioration of memory. This is what Pflock found when he interviewed almost everybody that was present in 1947. The sudden fame and possible financial renumeration helps to sway an already weakened mind.
There is only one author that one can trust to give you the facts on this case and that's Karl T. Pflock. Every other author offers less or different "facts".