It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BREAKING: Assange Suggests Murdered Seth Rich Was Wikileaks DNC Source!

page: 11
219
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:02 AM
link   
a reply to: In4ormant

Well at least she never threatened a build a wall to keep out Mexicans and close the borders to Muslims.

Yes Hillary is smug, shady and shifty but I'd rather her than an arrogant, hypocritical, self centered dunce who has no experience in diplomacy or economics (Trump has had at least four failed business.)

Would you vote in someone who ran businesses into the ground? would vote in someone who talks nukes and has no idea about M.A.D? Google M.A.D- I'm guessing most Trump followers will have to.




posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant

those are only the ones we know about.

Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.







Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.


lol, he's gone.

He's bunking with Jimmy Hoffa now.





That's why I asked. I had heard some rumblingS about him disappearing but I can't find anything on it.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: In4ormant

Well at least she never threatened a build a wall to keep out Mexicans and close the borders to Muslims.

Yes Hillary is smug, shady and shifty but I'd rather her than an arrogant, hypocritical, self centered dunce who has no experience in diplomacy or economics (Trump has had at least four failed business.)

Would you vote in someone who ran businesses into the ground? would vote in someone who talks nukes and has no idea about M.A.D? Google M.A.D- I'm guessing most Trump followers will have to.



A wall to keep out ILLEGAL Mexicans. No problem with that. Enforcing an existing law. Somelody needs to.

You would rather have someone you "know" is dangerous versus someone you "think" is.

At least with Trump you could be wrong, with Hillary there's 0 chance.

Seems you would want to at least give yourself a chance versus throwing in the towel.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:09 AM
link   
OP NOTE: Please stay on Topic. THIS thread is NOT about Trump...or Clinton vs. Trump. --TYVM
edit on 10-8-2016 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
OP NOTE: Please stay on Topic. THIS thread is NOT about Trump...or Clinton vs. Trump. --TYVM


Too early for bold caps. Only on my second cup.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: AboveBoard
It originated from Sorcha Faal. Normally that's enough for people to roll their eyes and move on but apparently Sorcha is an acceptable source now because Hillary.


originally posted by: muse7
I'm still trying to figure out how a 27 year old that works in the voter expansion division could have access to sensitive DNC information.

I'm also trying to figure out where the hell the story that he was en route to the FBI on the night of his murder, originated from...when his family said he told his girlfriend he was on his way home and "almost there"

Snopes

Assange is an anarchist that would love to see the world burn and personally has an axe to grind against Hillary


That statement is complete bunk. Assange's own words in a public interview are the originator and the source of "Assange Suggests Murdered Seth Rich Was Wikileaks DNC Source!", you know....the thread title. Attempt to twist his words but an attempt to staple Sorcha to this won't work and it is laughable desperation.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: IAMTAT

This plus the 20,000k reward from Wikileaks on any information on Seth Rich's death makes it pretty clear that he was a working with them.

It also shows how desperate the Clinton cabal is and indicates that Assange may truly have some gold that he is waiting for just the right moment to release.



This. That's gotta be a pretty hefty reward for them.

I pray for his family, and his soul, they get to the bottom of this and ALL of those responsible are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
Assange seems to be planting seeds here.

This is extremely interesting as the death itself seems to be pretty convenient.

I picked this story up about 2 hours ago and didn't post it because I'm still busy researching what was actually said, or at least if there is something else Assange could have meant by this statement.


What I heard was him inferring that Seth Rich might have been murdered for political reasons and if so, then there are "significant risks" for people leaking material.

I don't see him suggesting that Seth Rich himself was the source of the DNC leaks, as a matter of fact if Seth Rich WAS the source of the DNC leaks, Assange would have have every reason in the world to immediately and loudly explain the same...for the purposes of exposing the motivation for the murder and Seth Rich obviously would no longer be at risk of retribution ..he is dead.

All of that on top of Multiple independent techies and tech firms have already explicitly tracked the hacking and leaks to Russian Intelligence.

Seth Rich's murder remains a mystery and Assange is playing fast and loose with data points to make an argument around leakers and risk..but no Seth Richards was not the source of the leaks and Assange didn't say he was.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

To openly say Seth is the source would expose people that were around him.
Just because he's dead doesn't mean wiki should invite people to investigate further into Seth's life and those he dealt with.

The "policy" of wiki is to NEVER disclose sources for multiple reasons.

b



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Bspiracy
a reply to: Indigo5

To openly say Seth is the source would expose people that were around him.
Just because he's dead doesn't mean wiki should invite people to investigate further into Seth's life and those he dealt with.


BS...Then why are they offering a 25k reward for more information concerning his murder???? Of course they are inviting people to investigate.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Offering a reward is incentive for someone else to find/identify the killer.

It's not an admission. It does imply which is ok and part of "the game" There's not a trigger given for people who harmed Seth to go out and start harming others.

b
edit on 10-8-2016 by Bspiracy because: speling



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:58 AM
link   
Mainstream media, including Fox, will not touch this story...instead, they'll send out a dozen talking heads to discuss how Trump is unfit for the presidency.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:00 AM
link   
a reply to: texasgirl

dead. He is dead. Airplane crash.

Not really well explained either.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: daaskapital

More transparency and accountability is good.


Well, I read this and all I can think of is those threads about invasion of privacy, the CCTV cameras, spying through your computer, etc.

Its kinda selective, isn't it?



I'm talking in a political context.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: texasgirl

dead. He is dead. Airplane crash.

Not really well explained either.


Where did you hear Bryan Pagliano was dead?
edit on 10-8-2016 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   
I can't listen to the video in this link right now, but perhaps someone can verify the claim?


Hillary Clinton strategist Bob Beckel called for WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange to be assassinated.


tweet

If it's true - how can the media erupt over a distortion of what Trump said yesterday, yet a Clinton strategist is allowed to call for a hit on Assange????

I think Assange seemed a bit scared in that interview. I think seeing his source get taken out (yes, I think Rich was his source), has made him realize how much danger he is in. I'm sure he has always been in danger, but the Clinton machine does not give up, and they are powerful. They might get to his protectors - and if they stop protecting him, I don't think he will be around long.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:25 AM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

Here it is:



He is literally calling for him to be assassinated in clear an unambiguous terms.

 


Fast forward to 1:04 to get to the commentary.
edit on 10-8-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: added relevant time stamp



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:38 AM
link   
I'm wondering if there could be a connection between Brian and Seth?



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:45 AM
link   
Rush Limbaugh discussing this story on air right now.
Another 10-15 million hearing about it NOW?
edit on 10-8-2016 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: texasgirl

dead. He is dead. Airplane crash.

Not really well explained either.


Where did you hear Bryan Pagliano was dead?

I did a search..... I get no hits for him being dead.
'Bryan Pagliano, life in danger' .... now that gets hits.



new topics

top topics



 
219
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join