It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BREAKING: Assange Suggests Murdered Seth Rich Was Wikileaks DNC Source!

page: 10
219
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Just broke on Drudge!
It certainly appears as if Assange is suggesting Seth Rich was one of his informants.

VIDEO:
www.youtube.com...


On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich who was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”

On Tuesday Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth rich.

Now this… Julian Assange suggested on Tuesday that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant.

Via Mike Cernovich: Was Seth Rich, the source of #DNCleaks, murdered? t.co... — Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) August 10, 2016

Julian Assange seems to suggests on Dutch television program Nieuwsuur that Seth Rich was the source for the Wikileaks-exposed DNC emails and was murdered.

Julian Assange: Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks.
As a 27 year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.

Reporter: That was just a robbery, I believe. Wasn’t it?

Julian Assange: No. There’s no finding. So… I’m suggesting that our sources take risks.


HOLY SH*T!


www.thegatewaypundit.com...


Don't expect anyone (national media) to actually report on this. It is counter to their narrative.


I DID see it reported briefly on FOX this morning.


They were reporting on it yesterday, too.




posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: vor78
a reply to: Dfairlite

It was on their F&F morning show maybe an hour and a half ago or so.


I just saw it too. Bill Hemmer ran the clip. America's news HQ is the show.

Assange said his sources know the risk and the police dept was asking for help because now they have their doubts if it was a robbery gone bad.




posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:20 AM
link   
you didn't have to write the K if you already wrote the three zeroes. you meant 20K but you wrote 20,000K. just sayin.

I don't know. what's gonna come of any of this? Once the FBI heard the guy was coming down they probably sent a couple agents over there to kill him. I mean how stupid are we to think this # doesn't happen?


a reply to: elementalgrove



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant

those are only the ones we know about.

Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.





Maybe I should ask for a notebook.
Just in case



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant

those are only the ones we know about.

Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.






Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:24 AM
link   
Can anyone tie Huma to Seth Rich?
...Or Seth Rich to Marc Rich?



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant

those are only the ones we know about.

Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.






Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.


He invoked the 5th 125 times.
What was the point of even showing up?

lawnewz.com...
edit on 10-8-2016 by In4ormant because: (no reason given)

edit on 10-8-2016 by In4ormant because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:29 AM
link   
Personally, I think that attempt to tie this in with the reports that Rich was going to meet with the FBI is a purposeful effort to discredit the entire notion that he was the source of the DNC leaks; it is well known that that aspect of the story originated with Sorcha Faal.

Any further discussion along those lines is completely and irredeemably tainted until and unless other corroborating information comes out. And even in that case, merely because it can be associated with Faal makes that part forever unclean in many people's eyes.

That being said, all of the other facts about Seth Rich's death are open for discussion.

Two of his former employers have very close ties to the Clintons, in fact he himself was going to start working directly for the Clinton campaign according to his father.

As others have pointed out, if his death was completely random and in no way related to his work or being the source of Wikileaks leak (not hack), then there should be an equal number of unrelated deaths associated with the RNC. Where are they?

Also, I would point out that in order to have a successful effort to manipulate the votes, one needs a way to also manipulate exit polling otherwise the vote rigging becomes too obvious.

From my thread that IAMTAT linked earlier in this one:


In order to engage in voter suppression, it is important to be very accurate in knowing which voters to suppress. The best possible way to compile such a list is to vet two or more separate databases against each other. Sanders had one, Clinton had two and the DNC had a third. We may never know the truth about the third because of a recent removal of a key potential witness from this mortal coil.


source

Seth Rich worked for Greenberg Quinlan Rosner immediately prior to working for the DNC. They are one of the Clinton ties to Seth Rich; along with Scott Kleeb for the other Clinton tie.

There are some other interesting connections back to the power player Soros discussed in the referenced thread to all of this as well.

A tangled web indeed.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant

those are only the ones we know about.

Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.






Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.


He invoked the 5th 125 times.
What was the point of even showing up?

lawnewz.com...


Probably to stay alive.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Can anyone tie Huma to Seth Rich?
...Or Seth Rich to Marc Rich?


Seth Rich Huma Abedin Google search...


Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe.


They do this with a lot of conspiracies in Europe.
Maybe you'll have better luck in the States with a Google search.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant

those are only the ones we know about.

Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.






Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.


He invoked the 5th 125 times.
What was the point of even showing up?

lawnewz.com...


Probably to stay alive.


True. Immunity won't protect you from the grave.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant

those are only the ones we know about.

Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.






Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.


He invoked the 5th 125 times.
What was the point of even showing up?

lawnewz.com...


Probably to stay alive.


True. Immunity won't protect you from the grave.

It does, however, make you high profile enough so suicide by four bullets to the back of the head looks too suspicious.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant

those are only the ones we know about.

Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.






Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.


He invoked the 5th 125 times.
What was the point of even showing up?

lawnewz.com...


Probably to stay alive.


True. Immunity won't protect you from the grave.

It does, however, make you high profile enough so suicide by four bullets to the back of the head looks too suspicious.



Comey would just say he was a bad shot. Nothing to see here.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:38 AM
link   
a reply to: LifeMode

Both Clinton and Trump are a danger to the nation and themselves. Trump is in more danger as he has nearly got shot at his own campaign, what do you think will happen if he gets elected? his election will get more westerners killed due to his xenophobia and his dumbassedry could get him and his followers killed.

At least Clinton has some sense of diplomacy; Trump is as diplomatic as a fart in an elevator.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: LifeMode

Both Clinton and Trump are a danger to the nation and themselves. Trump is in more danger as he has nearly got shot at his own campaign, what do you think will happen if he gets elected? his election will get more westerners killed due to his xenophobia and his dumbassedry could get him and his followers killed.

At least Clinton has some sense of diplomacy; Trump is as diplomatic as a fart in an elevator.



Please site her sense of diplomacy. I'm curious.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: LifeMode

Both Clinton and Trump are a danger to the nation and themselves. Trump is in more danger as he has nearly got shot at his own campaign, what do you think will happen if he gets elected? his election will get more westerners killed due to his xenophobia and his dumbassedry could get him and his followers killed.

At least Clinton has some sense of diplomacy; Trump is as diplomatic as a fart in an elevator.



Please site her sense of diplomacy. I'm curious.



We came, we saw, he died, hahahahahahahaha.



That's diplomacy right there.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: LifeMode

Both Clinton and Trump are a danger to the nation and themselves. Trump is in more danger as he has nearly got shot at his own campaign, what do you think will happen if he gets elected? his election will get more westerners killed due to his xenophobia and his dumbassedry could get him and his followers killed.

At least Clinton has some sense of diplomacy; Trump is as diplomatic as a fart in an elevator.



Xenophobia? Uh, you mean actually ENFORCING the current laws of the land regarding immigration? That xenophobia?

And pray tell, just how is Trump going to get anyone killed, especially when compared to Clinton? I do not understand how you people come to conclusions based on zero data. While Clinton has been PROVEN to lie and to vote for wars that are downright criminal, like Iraq, which Trump was against, publicly. But yet, Trump is the one who is going to get people killed? What a maroon. This is what happens when you watch too much tv.

And the fact that the young man was murdered and nothing stolen and that he worked for the dnc, means that either the worst crook in the world robbed him (doubtful) or he was murdered because of something he knew or something he did. And given the statistical number of deaths surrounding Clinton, I would say that she is a much larger danger to EVERYONE compared to Trump, by a RIDICULOUS MARGIN. To the point where I don't understand why anyone would even be MENTIONING Trump's name when it comes to being dangerous, when you have a Clinton and her proven danger to all those around her for decades.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant

those are only the ones we know about.

Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.







Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.


lol, he's gone.

He's bunking with Jimmy Hoffa now.






posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Can anyone tie Huma to Seth Rich?
...Or Seth Rich to Marc Rich?


Seth Rich Huma Abedin Google search...


Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe.


They do this with a lot of conspiracies in Europe.
Maybe you'll have better luck in the States with a Google search.


this is what I got.




Your access to this site has been limited Your access to this service has been temporarily limited.

Please try again in a few minutes. (HTTP response code 503) Reason: Access from your area has been temporarily limited for security reasons Important note for site admins: If you are the administrator of this website note that your access has been limited because you broke one of the Wordfence firewall rules. The reason your access was limited is: "Access from your area has been temporarily limited for security reasons". If this is a false positive, meaning that your access to your own site has been limited incorrectly, then you will need to regain access to your site, go to the Wordfence "options" page, go to the section for Rate Limiting Rules and disable the rule that caused you to be blocked. For example, if you were blocked because it was detected that you are a fake Google crawler, then disable the rule that blocks fake google crawlers. Or if you were blocked because you were accessing your site too quickly, then increase the number of accesses allowed per minute. If you're still having trouble, then simply disable the Wordfence firewall and you will still benefit from the other security features that Wordfence provides. If you are a site administrator and have been accidentally locked out, please enter your email in the box below and click "Send". If the email address you enter belongs to a known site administrator or someone set to receive Wordfence alerts, we will send you an email to help you regain access. Please read this FAQ entry if this does not work.


jackpineradicals.com...

That's pretty strange.



edit on 8 10 2016 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 09:59 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Seems to work fine for me:



I will see what I can find.



new topics

top topics



 
219
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join