It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Does Trump advocate Clinton assassination?

page: 6
28
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:41 PM
link   
It sounded like she would be the one to cause the USA to collapse.
Is there anyone here who believes that stripping the second amendment would not cause at minimal a succession crisis?
They will try to ban rifle accessories again, which happen to be the rifles that would be best in a civil unrest event. Those rifles are rarely used in crimes.
All he said is what we all know. Try to ban the second amendment and millions of gun owners will be at their state capitols.




posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

Hey Introvert thats ok nbc evening news is spouting the same "he may have meant" crap that you are.
At least you and the msm are on the same page right?


His sentence structure was not very clear. It is very hard to tell what he meant.

It is not clear that he was referring to the SCOTUS nominees and it is not clear if he was referring to it being a "horrible day" when discussing what the 2nd amendment supporters could do.

Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that Trump was not clear in his message and we can chalk this up to another instance where Trump says something stupid without a precise point.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:42 PM
link   
a reply to: jellyrev

This rhetoric "ban the 2nd Amendment" continues to be peddled on the Right, even though nobody is pushing for it on the Left. It's a made up boogeyman.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

Hey Introvert thats ok nbc evening news is spouting the same "he may have meant" crap that you are.
At least you and the msm are on the same page right?


I usually dislike promoting my own threads, but I touched on this topic here. The guesswork is not only nonsense, but unfitting of journalism.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:44 PM
link   


It;s starting to seep out... it's called over reach in criticism that starts to smell like BS and then stinks to high heaven to a lot of people...



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:44 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Poor sentence structure is always a lead story on the nbc evening news right?

At least you can sleep well knowing your on the right side of this one.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:45 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Trump was right again. The MSM is dishonest.

We can not trust one single thing in the news anymore. I think their credibility is done.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

Hey Introvert thats ok nbc evening news is spouting the same "he may have meant" crap that you are.
At least you and the msm are on the same page right?


haha yes, the same MSM now openly admittiing they are biased and pushing the agenda to keep Trump out of the Whitehouse as hard as they can. We knew it of course, but now they are saying it.

www.foxnews.com...


Holy crap..did you just provide a link to a Fox News ass-hat whining about how the media has apolitical bias to it's reporting???? Effen FOX NEWS???

That is priceless...

The media simply reports what Trump says...and it's the media's fault for reporting???

Puhleesse...This Trump (the media whore) as the victim (of the media attention he desperately craves like a child) bit is just ludicrous...



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

Rubbish? I'm trying to be objective.

What does he mean by "that will be a horrible day"?

What was he referring to when he said that?


I listened...reversed and listened again. Taking all the surrounding subject matter and putting it in context, Donald is saying it will be a horrible day if Hillary Clinton gets to choose SC justices because at her core she is anti-2A. However, the 2A people are strong and powerful supporters of our constitution, so the courts may see a fight on their hands.

Only a moron would see a call for her assassination in what Trump said in his speech. But...there are lots of morons getting really wacky right now.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:46 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

And completely irresponsible of Trump to use such language. At worst, he's intentionally encouraging violence. At best, he's a rookie who can't handle the basics of responsible speech. aka... a F-ing moron. Take your pick.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

Poor sentence structure is always a lead story on the nbc evening news right?

At least you can sleep well knowing your on the right side of this one.



Not sure what point you are trying to make? It's important to dissect the language and sentence structure when trying to discern what someone meant.

It's like paying attention to the commas in the writing of the 2nd amendment, correct?



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5




The media simply reports what Trump says...and it's the media's fault for reporting???


A 45 minute speech and you claim reporting on 5 seconds of it is an instance of the media reporting on what Trump says?



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

Rubbish? I'm trying to be objective.

What does he mean by "that will be a horrible day"?

What was he referring to when he said that?


If she appoints the SC judges.

But don't never you mind, because she is used to gunfire and death.

Snipers couldn't take her out, so she's not worried about some yokel with a .40 cal.







posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

And completely irresponsible of Trump to use such language. At worst, he's intentionally encouraging violence. At best, he's a rookie who can't handle the basics of responsible speech. aka... a F-ing moron. Take your pick.



He did not encourage violence in any way, shape, or form. I bet you didn't even listen to the speech within the entire context.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:48 PM
link   
a reply to: stinkelbaum

Someone in the Aussie media must be trolling ATS. As I was reading this thread much the same words as the OP title appeared on the morning news here.

regards,

bally



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: Ohanka
This has always perplexed me about America.

100 million estimated gun owners with 300 million guns.

Yet Hillary still lives and the Oligarchy remains in power

I don't understand you, America.


Yes, because every candidate should be encourage people to gun down their enemies. Good god, what the hell is wrong with you?

You apparently fail in reading even the most basic of English.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualzombie




And completely irresponsible of Trump to use such language. At worst, he's intentionally encouraging violence. At best, he's a rookie who can't handle the basics of responsible speech. aka... a F-ing moron. Take your pick.


A false dilemma. The more likely case is the anti-Trump crowd and the gutter press are unscrupulous, fallacious and without journalistic integrity.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom


Trump didn't call for anyone to be assassinated. And as per usual, the media is conflating this to be something that it isn't and you bought it.


You tell me: was Trump bravely encouraging Americans to exercise their Second Amendment right to stand up against tyranny? Or was he being a politically correct wimp, telling them to let Washington insiders and professional lobbyists handle crooked Hillary's attempt to abrogate their God given rights?



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

The implication is there, solely based on his language. There is no real way to decide one way or another since he did not speak it a clear and concise manner.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

When that five seconds is the part where he vilified and made a veiled endorsement of a Hillary assassination... yeah that 5 secs Trump's the other 45 mins.



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join