It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Does Trump advocate Clinton assassination?

page: 21
28
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:37 AM
link   
It's truly unbelievable how ridiculous Hillary lovers are.

Every single anti-Trump thread on ATS, is pretty much what IF made up BS. They are never discussing facts, but are only trying to take Trump's words out of context, in order for them to be able to bash him. It's honestly really pathetic.

I recommend people not to waste their time on nonsense such as this, and let a selected few Hillary lovers to discuss this with themselves, when, they do not want to participate in threads with pure facts against their cult leader.




posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:37 AM
link   
double post...Trump's sent me some nice Russian vodka






edit on 338k2016Wednesdayam014 by Nikola014 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:40 AM
link   
HE WAS IMPLYING THAT GUN OWNERS MIGHT HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE THAN TO REVOLT IF HILLARY AND HER SUPREME COURT APPOINTEES GO AFTER GUN RIGHTS.

JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE GET A GRIP! ALL OF YOU!



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:45 AM
link   
Once again:


originally posted by: maria_stardust
FAIR WARNING...

The staff has decided to reopen this thread with the understanding that any mudslinging, personal attacks or other such trollery will not be condoned. Posts deemed to be political trollery will automatically receive TWO WARNINGS.

This point is not up for negotiation. You've all been duly warned.

As usual, do not reply to this post.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:49 AM
link   
The magical thinking involved in interpreting "[there is] nothing you can do, folks. Although the second amendment people, maybe there is. I don't know", to mean advocating assassination, has reached twilight-zone levels.

Even if he did imply "2nd amendment folks" could take matters into their own hand, something you could not know without special access to Trump's thoughts even despite your half-baked deductions, then well done, you have only proven yourself to be humourless in condemning a man for kidding around. Worse than your gimcrack attempts at journalism, however, is the complete dismissal of the rest of Trump's speech, all 99.9% of it, which now lays absent from your tawdry scrutiny.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:55 AM
link   

May 23, 2008 Categories: HRC Hillary cites RFK assassination in explaining why she's still in race



Hillary Clinton today cited the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy during the 1968 presidential campaign to explain why she was remaining in the race despite long odds. "We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California," Clinton told the editorial board of a South Dakota newspaper. " I don't understand it," Clinton added, alluding to the calls for her to quit. Clinton made the statement after pointing out that her husband didn't lock up the nomination until June of 1992, trying to point out that, by past history, it's not late in the campaign.


The spin:

UPDATE: Clinton's campaign has put out a statement in her name, apologizing for the remark. "The Kennedys have been much on my mind the last days because of Sen. Kennedy and I regret that if my referencing that moment of trauma for our entire nation, and particularly for the Kennedy family, was in any way offensive," she said.


The meaning:
Anything can happen even if it is a (long shot) /pun



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:02 PM
link   
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall

Using Hillary to justify Trump.

Doesn't work.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bone75
HE WAS IMPLYING THAT GUN OWNERS MIGHT HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE THAN TO REVOLT IF HILLARY AND HER SUPREME COURT APPOINTEES GO AFTER GUN RIGHTS.

JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE GET A GRIP! ALL OF YOU!


Get a grip? That's really the crux of the matter isn't it? Some people want to get a grip on a gun and overthrow, or stop, the government, in this hypothetical case from the appointment of Supreme Justices, with their "well regulated militia". They really think that this could happen!


edit on 10-8-2016 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall

Using Hillary to justify Trump.

Doesn't work.


She used the word assassination.Trump didn't. Where's the media frenzy?



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Even if he did imply "2nd amendment folks" could take matters into their own hand, something you could not know without special access to Trump's thoughts even despite your half-baked deductions, then well done, you have only proven yourself to be humourless in condemning a man for kidding around. *snip


The POTUS needs to be a man/woman with the ability to communicate effectively...Trumps inability to make an unscripted statement without correction from his 'camp' is alarming and potentially dangerous not only for the American people but the world.


As we know, the POTUS with a word, can effect the economy and global security....scary....no joke.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall

Using Hillary to justify Trump.

Doesn't work.


She used the word assassination.Trump didn't. Where's the media frenzy?


This is about Trump. Not Hillary.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: kinglizard

As we know, the POTUS with a word, can effect the economy and global security....scary....no joke.


Yes, in the very early days of Obama's presidency he made a couple off-the-cuff remarks as a joke.

He learned quick you can't do that in this position.

Trump won't learn.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

This is about both of them. That argument in threads is tiring. Trump did not call on anyone to kill anyone. Again, like the crying baby and purple heart these are non stories generated to create more and more hate.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

This is about both of them. That argument in threads is tiring. Trump did not call on anyone to kill anyone. Again, like the crying baby and purple heart these are non stories generated to create more and more hate.


No, you can't spin this.

Trump is beyond spinning damage control from what spews irresponsibly out of his mouth.

Some learn from their mistakes. He doesn't.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:41 PM
link   
a reply to: kinglizard




The POTUS needs to be a man/woman with the ability to communicate effectively...Trumps inability to make an unscripted statement without correction from his 'camp' is alarming and potentially dangerous not only for the American people but the world.


People say this all the time but without anything to back it up, except for maybe providing their own fears as evidence. But you'll notice that those who make that claim "communicate" indirectly with Trump through various media, while those who communicate directly, have nothing but positive things to say.

What is alarming and dangerous is the dependency on scripted, opaque and slithery rhetoric of career politicians, the media in their pockets, and calling that effective communication.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

What is alarming and dangerous is the dependency on scripted, opaque and slithery rhetoric of career politicians, the media in their pockets, and calling that effective communication.


No, that's smart.

We're in an age where every word, action, facial tic is scrutinized.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee




No, that's smart.

We're in an age where every word, action, facial tic is scrutinized.


That's not the case, especially when the majority of Trump's words are completely absent from scrutiny. The scrutiny on this particular speech is spent on less than a fraction of it.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

No spin...They are not mistakes. I do not listen to clips i listen to speeches. Full speeches. Both sides.

He learns from attacks and fights back.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

No spin...They are not mistakes. I do not listen to clips i listen to speeches. Full speeches. Both sides.

He learns from attacks and fights back.


It's clear to most what Trump implied.

And its not what Trump supporters are trying to spin it to mean.


edit on 10-8-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee




Everyone knows what Trump implied.


That's impossible. Short of asking him, you have nothing.




top topics



 
28
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join