It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Does Trump advocate Clinton assassination?

page: 18
28
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: desert
a reply to: angeldoll

And if I remember, Gabby (along with other elected officials) had been featured in one of Palin's ads with a cross hairs over her name.

I love Liz Warren! She gets it.


Actually, I sort of posted those for you. : )




posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 08:50 PM
link   
a reply to: misterhistory

How about this..www.bob-owens.com...



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 08:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: desert
a reply to: angeldoll

I saw Trump's mean sadistic heart last Winter, when he yelled about taking the coat of the protester and throwing him out in the cold. I think this time he again exposed his sadistic heart with his statement. I think he's a smart bully, but like any bully that knows either he can't/won't take action, he eggs people on.

Did he "really" mean it?.... I think this time he just couldn't help blurt out another sadistic "funny" thought in his head, but I don't think even he understands just how bad that sounded. No, I don't think it was a directive to assassinate or revolt in an armed uprising, but a sadistic joke.

And that inability to filter what he says may have been part of his success in the private sector, but it is not a good thing, it is a dangerous thing, when attempting to govern. Especially bad for the leader of a powerful nation.


I remember how he begged Hillary to come to his wedding. So I too, prefer to think he was not openly inviting one of the country's many nutjobs to kill her.


(post by neo96 removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 09:02 PM
link   
Trump's statement was ambiguous, but I had to be told what the ambiguity was. I doubt whether any but the most well informed members of the public would have jumped to the conclusion that Mr. Trump was talking about the strength of the gun rights lobby.

Most people would have jumped to the conclusion that Mr. Trump was implying or insinuating that the 2nd Amendment folks could handle the Clinton problem another way, i.e., by resorting to the use of their weapons.

It's the ambiguity that is the issue, the failure to make his meaning clear, the seeming lack of awareness on Mr. Trump's part that he had made a dangerously ambiguous statement, and that's interpreting what he said in the best possible light.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 09:02 PM
link   
a reply to: angeldoll

Muchas gracias!

And I think we all know damn well what that schmuck would say if some nutjob did try to assassinate someone..... Trump would first think, "That's not my problem!" Then he would come out and say, "I never told anyone to do anything! And if I did say words, that person should never have taken them seriously. I was just joking!"

Well, tomorrow is another day!



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 09:12 PM
link   
a reply to: stinkelbaum

If not for the gun, we would still be paying a tax on tea.

Gun control is not about guns. Gun control is about control.
In 1939, Germany became to first country to disarm the citizens. If every Jew in Europe had 1 gun and one bullet, Hitler would have been a footnot in the history books.

The reason Japan did not hit the West Coast after Hawaii is because Hirohito said there would be a gun behind every blade of grass.
Guns keep us free. There is a price to pay but freedom has its cost.


edit on 9-8-2016 by atrollstalker because: I damn well felt like it.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 09:28 PM
link   
ATTENTION!!!

Once again, because apparently this bears repeating, this is NOT the Mud Pit.

This thread will be closed for 30 minutes to allow one and all an opportunity to read the previous staff warning.

Further escapades of the mudslinging variety will be hit with a political trollery warning. This type of warning automatically count as two.

ETA: This thread will remain closed pending a staff review.

edit on 8/9/2016 by maria_stardust because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 11:19 PM
link   
FAIR WARNING...

The staff has decided to reopen this thread with the understanding that any mudslinging, personal attacks or other such trollery will not be condoned. Posts deemed to be political trollery will automatically receive TWO WARNINGS.

This point is not up for negotiation. You've all been duly warned.

As usual, do not reply to this post.
edit on 8/9/2016 by maria_stardust because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 11:26 PM
link   
As a charter NRA member...what Trump alluded to is despicable. He knew exactly what he said.
edit on 9-8-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 11:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: Ohanka
This has always perplexed me about America.

100 million estimated gun owners with 300 million guns.

Yet Hillary still lives and the Oligarchy remains in power

I don't understand you, America.


Yes, because every candidate should be encourage people to gun down their enemies. Good god, what the hell is wrong with you?


That is indeed how our military proceeds with what they do, and they are also given that mandate by top brass.

Are they supposed to address soldiers and say "Go out there but don't hurt the enemy."?

Of course seeing this same thing be told to the people seems a bit off, but it is that way because society has become totally impotent and has forgotten that freedom is not free.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 11:51 PM
link   
Saw that on the news and yes it did come off a subtle hint or joke and he meant it that way or it wasn't . Kind of has a double meaning.

I think sometimes he cracks jokes without realizing the implications.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 12:44 AM
link   
I have just read all 18 pages of this thread.
I think the media spin is ridiculous,(never mind the crowd parroting the rhetoric). He meant for the 2nd amendment crowd to vote accordingly..nothing more.
What I fear is that this is a pretense for a false flag attempt against Hillary's life to occur, just to blame Trump for instigating the event(false or not). Their spin gives them ammunition in this regard.
Imagine now if ANYTHING that threatens her life involving firearms happens, they have a patsy, a candidate to blame, and a solid argument(though falsely gained), to further their grab on tyranny, and we are all effed.
This is a conspiracy site last I checked.
edit on 8/10/2016 by jappee because: Punctuation errors



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 01:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: jappee
He meant for the 2nd amendment crowd to vote accordingly..nothing more.


Ya know what? That's BS.

He knows exactly what he said and meant - - - and so does everyone else.

The only spin off this is damage control.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 01:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI

Yes, we must draw a line. Words mean nothing. Actions do.


That's strange because I can't count how many times I've heard conservatives scream about Obama not saying the words "Radical Islam".

That he won't even say those words!!!!!! Say the God Damn Words, "RADICAL ISLAM"!!!

But if words mean nothing, why is it you care so much about other peoples words and not your Cult Leader Trump and his Words???

Hypocrites and Liars, every one of you. We all know what he said and we all know what he meant. We've always known. Every single time this or something similar happens, we ALL KNOW. Only some of you act like you don't know. What a joke.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 01:31 AM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

Where does it say I'm voting for Trump? Did I brink up anything about ISIS/ISIL? Who the ()#) are you even talking to?

Trump says some things and people just loose their )#(# over it. In the Democratic party you have REAL..PROVEN collusion and heads stay in the sand.

Get a grip.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 02:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: spiritualzombie

Here's a LESSON for Trump critics.

READ.



Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.




Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.





Those amendments are based upon rights and then law, would I be correct in saying a few would be neglected concerning Trump's stance on Immigrants? I dare say for instance Japanese-Americans rights were violated during WWII.

Would I be correct in saying pushes for gun control are NOT a call to abolish gun ownership but a call for regulation?

Americans have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, it's written down... Though if happiness to you is mass murder I don't think the constitution protects you nor would it if liberty was having no neighbours or having rid of "those" neighbours.

You're a flaming idiot if you think any weapon you can get will make a difference against an organised army and as far as I have seen nobody has called for the disarmament of US militias. I imagine many can still own a howitzer or a heavy machine gun in 20 years time within reason, why are you convinced gubment wants ya guns?
edit on Wed Aug 10 2016 by DontTreadOnMe because: trimmed quote .. Quote Crash Course



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 02:09 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

It's not about you saying Trump. It's about the phrase "Words mean Nothing."

That's the phrase you used.

Oddly enough if Words really meant Nothing then it seems strange you'd be so Triggered by mine in that last post.

Maybe it's you who needs to get a grip.

I'm not in the Democratic Party either BTW.
edit on 10-8-2016 by mOjOm because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 02:11 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 03:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: atrollstalker
a reply to: stinkelbaum

If not for the gun, we would still be paying a tax on tea.

Gun control is not about guns. Gun control is about control.
In 1939, Germany became to first country to disarm the citizens. If every Jew in Europe had 1 gun and one bullet, Hitler would have been a footnot in the history books.

The reason Japan did not hit the West Coast after Hawaii is because Hirohito said there would be a gun behind every blade of grass.
Guns keep us free. There is a price to pay but freedom has its cost.



No. Hitler did not introduce gun control in Germany, he just introduced ifor the Jews. As for your statement about Hirohito forbidding the invasion of the West Coast, your statement is a load of absolute rubbish. The Japanese did not have the ships to invade Hawaii after Pearl Harbour, let alone the West Coast.



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join