It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source? I'm really looking forward to reading it by the way.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: DJW001
Weak. When I'm not on my phone I'm going to dissect your (futile) argument.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: DJW001
Because they don't exist. If you haven't figured it out by now the DNC is a collective bunch of fools and tools.
Here is a documented example: in 2004, Trump purchased a property in Florida for $41 million dollars. In 2008, he sold it to Russian Oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev for $95 million dollars. There are many other examples of Trump selling properties to Russian oligarchs at suspiciously inflated prices, which raises questions about the real nature of the deals.
His campaign adviser, Paul Manafort, filled a similar role with Ukraine's Russian puppet Viktor Yanukovych, and is quoted as having said that violence at the Republican national convention would be a boon to the campaign.
Just before the convention, one of Trump's foreign policy advisers, Carter Page, delivered a speech in Moscow criticizing America's insistence on taking human rights into consideration in its foreign policy. It was not revealed how large his fee was, but when he returned, Trump insisted on taking pro-Ukrainian language out of the party platform, and Trump is on record now favoring accepting Russia's annexation of Crimea.
What I find strange is that you can consider a bump on Clinton's tongue as evidence that she is a member of a mythical occult conspiracy, but when Trump surrounds himself with pro-Russian advisers, stuffs his pockets with Russian oligarch money, then sets off on a pro-Russian campaign, you don't think there is anything suspicious going on.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: MagnaCarta2015
Bit of a vapid hit piece there. Blaming it on them not liking the Democrats doesn't take away from the validity of the leaked information. If it's true then it's true and needs to be out there.
The leaked information shows absolutely no criminal activity. All it shows is marketing strategies. There are humorous references which, when taken out of context, look bad. For example,they refer to the Hispanic vote as "taco bowls" not because they do not respect Hispanics, but because of Trump's idiotic attempt to sway them by posting a picture of himself with a taco bowl. You may find their attitude cynical, but they are not the ones insulting people openly.
Ok first of all, let me ask you something. Are you aware of what Russia's economy was like in 2008?
So the fact that Trump acquired this property in Florida at a low cost when the market was good and then managed to sell it to a wealthy Russian Oligarch (not mobster, Oligarch)
in the height of a housing collapse & financial crisis, really speaks volumes about his knowledge on foreign investments and people fleeing the regulations of their currency in their native land.
In fact, that's exactly the kind of man I would want working to fix our economy right now.
When the housing market collapsed in 07-08, the luxury market in Florida continued to prevail. Miami is a perfect example of this.
What was really hit hardest in Florida at the time (as well as the rest of the country) were first time home buyers who's mortgages were subsidized into subprime loans and then traded by investment bankers on the foreign market.
Trump's Campaign Manager? His CAMPAIGN MANAGER? Not he himself, nor his children, nor his VP, but his Campaign Manager?
That doesn't make any damn sense. His Campaign manager has ties to a Ukrainian Politician, but that does not support the narrative that Trump is colluding with Russia to bring down the DNC & HRC. Why? Because as you pointed out already, Ukraine hates Russia. So if Russia was colluding with Trump, don't you think they might think twice about about getting involved in our elections to aide his campaign? Why would Russia be willingly colluding with someone who, as you put it, has ties to Ukrainian separatists?
Again, Trump has explicitly favored the Ukraine/Crimea annexation by Russia.
I don't necessarily agree with that position, but I suspect that he's strategically building rapport with Putin so that he can reestablish good ties with Russia and end the Cold War (which never stopped, by the way).
All of this is good.
If Putin is willing to communicate with Trump out of respect
Putin is a smart mofo, he is wise to the Globalists, and so is Trump.
Wikileaks will leak what they want.
Everything they have leaked has been correct.
That's all the high ground they need as far as I'm concerned.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: cuckooold
If you haven't done anything wrong, then you have nothing to hide.
Isn't that the old saying?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: burgerbuddy
Wikileaks will leak what they want.
Exactly: they have a clear pro-Russian agenda.