It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

where did he go? was time travel involved?

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

True, if nanoseconds are enough for you. Because otherwise he would have had to leave Earth and all other sources of gravity, or dive into a black hole.
He would be incredible famous if he would have accomplished real gravity manipulation and I would guess two spinning magnets, as he proposed have been tried and failed.




posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 04:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: yuppa

True, if nanoseconds are enough for you. Because otherwise he would have had to leave Earth and all other sources of gravity, or dive into a black hole.
He would be incredible famous if he would have accomplished real gravity manipulation and I would guess two spinning magnets, as he proposed have been tried and failed.


I didnt mention black holes though. HUmans arent built to time travel. Now you could send a message back to yourself and make it so you can seem to "dissapear" prolly though.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

That would be cheating, like faking your own death. But how would we receive messages from the future as long as we don't know how to send them? And if we figure out how to send them all the messages you send yourself would have already been sent and change nothing for your future self. So it seems pretty pointless.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: yuppa

That would be cheating, like faking your own death. But how would we receive messages from the future as long as we don't know how to send them? And if we figure out how to send them all the messages you send yourself would have already been sent and change nothing for your future self. So it seems pretty pointless.


ACtually when you send a message backwards you in effect create a new worldline. So you cant really directly effect your current self. that self ceases to be most likely because of your interference. And since you switched worldlines you sidestep the paradox of sending the message back. Also almost all memory of said switch is overwritten seamlessly and instantly.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 08:57 PM
link   
I have time traveled since this thread begun yesterday....


For practical application get to the event horizon of a black hole and knock yourself out with as much time travel as one desires...


RA



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 01:16 AM
link   
Maybe he is time traveling right now and causing this whole Mandela effect theory ! ....lol...uh oh ! Is it real ?



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 04:43 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Or the future self sends you into a parallel reality and with this creates another dimension. The Mandela Effect. Unfortunately the conservation of mass, doesn't allow that. At least not physical.
But information has no mass. What if our thoughts and all conscience, i.e. Not physical information, is another dimension and you could travel with that through time, by switching places with a second conscience.
Maybe that's what we see with entanglement? Information travelling space outside of time? To us it looks like spooky action at a distance with almost zero time difference, but to them outside of time it was almost endless?



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: yuppa

Or the future self sends you into a parallel reality and with this creates another dimension. The Mandela Effect. Unfortunately the conservation of mass, doesn't allow that. At least not physical.
But information has no mass. What if our thoughts and all conscience, i.e. Not physical information, is another dimension and you could travel with that through time, by switching places with a second conscience.
Maybe that's what we see with entanglement? Information travelling space outside of time? To us it looks like spooky action at a distance with almost zero time difference, but to them outside of time it was almost endless?


No. Well I have a alternate to that one. Your future self sees it as a "failure" Because your past self chooses a alternate route and they diverge. That steps around the conservation of mass. But does DATA have a MASS? Do ones and zeros virtual particles have a mass? If they are massless surprise conservation of mass is negated as a restriction correct?
As to Sending your personality back.... THAT is ALOT of information. and you Would require a black holes compression ability to make it small enough to send back in a message. And then ONLY to a version of YOU.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Agreed, with nothing to add.




top topics



 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join