It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Medical Records about to be leaked?? - Unconfirmed

page: 17
38
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 06:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: elouina

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: elouina

The source for the medical reports has been deleted from Twitter. It was something like Hillsmedicalrecords if memory serves me right. But once again. does this matter? Unless we get actual reports from Hillary's doctor herself anything else is conspiracy.



I am referring to the 'sources' that the OP mentioned which led them to the Twitter account.

ETA: And YES, it matters a great deal who turned the OP onto the HillsMedRecords twitter account just two hours after the records were tweeted.


Then this means every post on ATS is a conspiracy because we all got our info from somewhere. Some media sources are quicker than others and some members are better at finding it. I would have found it moments after him, I assure you. I was just busy at work at the time.

Accusing other members of illegal activities isn't appropriate here.


I didn't accuse anyone of jack.

And it is standard to actually cite sources here on ATS. In the case of the OP, no sources were cited although they were referenced, in the original post. Most posts contain an actual source. How did the OP find this Twitter account so fast? It's a simple question.

Quick or slow, I'd still like to know the referenced sources from the OP. I'm not satisfied and distracted by your claim that you would have found the Twitter account anyway. That's not relevant.

ETA: Also, I do not mean to single out the OP. I would never find any other ATSer credible, either, if they simply said they were looking through "some sources" and found something like this...AND then never said what those sources were when questioned.



That was obvious inneuendo.... Let me message them, I didn't want to bother them since they were busy.

Twitter was their source, they messaged me all excited about it and sent me the link. I told them to post it ASAP ( before someone else did.) It was their first topic here, but they did it and did a good job. Hey it's a good scoop they had there. Even messaged them a congrats on their first topic. Someone always has to be first, and if I had the time, it would always be me here at ATS. Some of us are better at scoops than others. AND WE ALL HAVE OUR SECRETS TO FINDING THE SCOOPS. I know how he found it without him even telling me.

Sooo.... Hint... You may want to visit the Twitter help pages if you aren't clear with how it works.. They don't call it social media for nothng.

edit on 12-8-2016 by elouina because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: elouina

Wow. The condescension.

I want to know how the OP came to learn of 'HillsMedRecords' from their "sources." How did they come to even know of this new and temporary account?

And why are you answering for the OP on my questions?

ETA: I am guessing it's not important to you how this hoax originated. But, just so you know, it's important to others who don't want to be aligned with/discredited by whoever gets the blame for it.




edit on 12-8-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 06:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: elouina

Wow. The condescension.

I want to know how the OP came to learn of 'HillsMedRecords' from their "sources." How did they come to even know of this new and temporary account?

And why are you answering for the OP on my questions?


It seems as if there is an air about ATS lately whereas the members are accused of doing things and I don't like it one darn bit.

We sad twitter and that was the source. Period...



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 06:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: elouina

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: elouina

Wow. The condescension.

I want to know how the OP came to learn of 'HillsMedRecords' from their "sources." How did they come to even know of this new and temporary account?

And why are you answering for the OP on my questions?


It seems as if there is an air about ATS lately whereas the members are accused of doing things and I don't like it one darn bit.

We sad twitter and that was the source. Period...


We? Who is 'we?'

And, yes, there has been talk of paid shiIIs, trolls, and controlled opposition. You have participated in some of those discussions.



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 06:45 PM
link   
a reply to: elouina

I have no idea what you are talking about or why you are putting words in my mouth.

I am also unsure as to why there is so much vehemence against those who would like more information about the source.

I see from your previous post that you also knew about this OP subject before it was posted and conversed with the poster regarding it. If you have any other info to share it would be interesting to us!



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 07:02 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

This source was twitter.p

The members at ATS believe the source for every other post, so why is this member being attacked?

In fact I was accused of fabricatng evidence in another topic. This seems to be a new trend at ATS.



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 07:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: elouina
a reply to: BlueAjah

This source was twitter.p

The members at ATS believe the source for every other post, so why is this member being attacked?

In fact I was accused of fabricatng evidence in another topic. This seems to be a new trend at ATS.



ATS members absolutely do NOT believe every source cited on here. The rest of your comment supports that. Besides, the OP still hasn't explained how they came to know of the Twitter account 'HillsMedRecords' within two hours of them tweeting these alleged records.

People need to question 'evidence.' I am not saying you have fabricated anything, but questioning sources and evidence is important.

I don't always agree with people for doubting evidence that I find worthy, but I 100% support them for questioning it.

I hope this trend does not die any time soon! But I also don't think it's a new trend.
edit on 12-8-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 07:26 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

This evidence isn't efabians evidence, he found it on Twitter and regurgitated it here.

Answer me this, have you ever searched with google? So why should Twitter be any different?

On other sites we report mass murders or explosions before anyone else. I guess this means we flew to Orlando or wherever and shot people or blew up buildings so we could post an article here. Seems a bit extreme for what should be a fun hobby.



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 07:47 PM
link   
a reply to: elouina

Ok, well it's clear you're going to answer all questions for efabian (and, yes, I find that curious).

If the OP's source was a simple Twitter search, at the very least they were mischaracterizing it by calling it their "sources."

And honestly, anything you or the OP says, at this point, is just really odd to me given this was a hoax that was clearly intended to make Trump supporters look bad and 'poisoned the well.'

If it makes you feel any better, I doubt anyone else on ATS is as cynical as me about all of this. But, there you have it. No innuendo.



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 07:49 PM
link   
AND do you want to know something else? I found an ATS member on Twitter without trying that is how darn good I am. Totally by accident that I bumped into them. And it wasn't efabian. And no, neither of us have ATS anything in our Twitter accounts. User names miles apart. So yes , I am a wiz on Twitter and Efabian is ten times better than me. But this also proves how small of a world this is.

Heck I can find out anything I want to know about anyone. I am so good it is scary. Ebafian is sad to say, even better than me. There goes my ego.. Yes I admit it... Shame on you Efabian.

So efabian is likely one of ATS's top corruption researchers, and all I can say is shame on anyone that would accuse him of anything.
edit on 12-8-2016 by elouina because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 07:53 PM
link   
Twatter wizards lol. This is kinda funny.

Come on now, this is complete nonsense these records. I don't doubt she's... well she's old, and I bet she is some sort of exhausted, hell I'll even go as far as saying she may very well have adult diapers, but these records are crap. Plain and simple.



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 07:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: elouina
AND do you want to know something else? I found an ATS member on Twitter without trying that is how darn good I am. Totally by accident that I bumped into them. And it wasn't efabian. And no, neither of us have ATS anything in our Twitter accounts. So yes , I am a wiz on Twitter and Efabian is ten times better than me.

Heck I can find out anything I want to know about anyone. I am so good it is scary. Ebafian is sad to say, even better than me. There goes my ego.. Yes I admit it... Shame on you Efabian.

So efabian is likely one of ATS's top corruption researchers, and all I can say is shame on anyone that would accuse him of anything.


Geez. You are just amazingly speshul. A wiz. Fabulous. I am, indeed, scared about how gosh-darned fabulous you say you are and how you think efabian is even better.

Just really knocked outta my socks.

BTW, efabian has less than 200 comments.

But they totes deserve the title of top researcher on ATS. And now that you vouch for him, well, why should anyone question anything?

Yay!



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 08:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: elouina

Wow. The condescension.

I want to know how the OP came to learn of 'HillsMedRecords' from their "sources." How did they come to even know of this new and temporary account?

And why are you answering for the OP on my questions?

ETA: I am guessing it's not important to you how this hoax originated. But, just so you know, it's important to others who don't want to be aligned with/discredited by whoever gets the blame for it.


There was a news report saying that it originates from Sorcha Faal.

Now... you may not be as familiar with SF as the rest of us, but "Sorcha" is not actually a Russian woman, but one David Booth, a source known for making things up Snopes did a "connect the dots", which is confirmed checking dates on the release of the stories.



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Byrd

I am familiar with Sorcha Faal.

The OP said they had this within two hours of the tweet. Is there a Sorcha Faal article on this that was published within two hours of the tweet?



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 08:09 PM
link   
Was THIS who originated the documents?
twitter.com...



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Actually, yes, I am quite good. Anyways, I have some important research business to attend to for a long while. And this is interfering with my research. So I am done wih this particular topic on ATS. Talkng about worthless crap doesn't rank high on my to do list.



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 08:20 PM
link   
Has the Vincent Fleck story been debunked yet?



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 08:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: elouina
Talkng about worthless crap doesn't rank high on my to do list.






Thanks. I needed that insight to make sense of what's gone on here.



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 08:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: elouina
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Actually, yes, I am quite good. Anyways, I have some important research business to attend to for a long while. And this is interfering with my research. So I am done wih this particular topic on ATS. Talkng about worthless crap doesn't rank high on my to do list.


I'm pretty sure I speak for everyone here when I say you continue to amaze us by describing just how important you are. Not that it's actually true, but this isn't the point.
edit on 12-8-2016 by pl3bscheese because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2016 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Has the Vincent Fleck story been debunked yet?



Snopes says the story is FALSE:

www.snopes.com...


What's very interesting about this is that Snopes got it wrong. They are referring to Daniel Fleck as the one rumored to be deceased and is supposedly Dr. Bardack's father. (Huh?) They called the office of Dr. Daniel Fleck to verify he was still alive.

Um....It's Vincent Fleck who died, not the son Daniel. Snopes, Snopes, Snopes...(shaking head)

ETA: I see that Snopes is responding to Twitter rumors of Dr. Daniel Fleck being dead, not the father.
edit on 12-8-2016 by texasgirl because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
38
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join