It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Creation v Evolution argument can end

page: 30
9
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:28 AM
link   
a reply to: pthena

Oops, organic




posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: pthena

Oops, organic


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis? since you clearly know better than the rest of us, you must have a superior theory.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:34 AM
link   

edit on 13-8-2016 by TheKnightofDoom because: no no no....



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:47 AM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman


Oops, organic

I went back and edited that.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:51 AM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis?

Intelligent design theory, PROVEN
I'm going to go check it out.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:53 AM
link   
I have empirical evidence of trolling. Just read the thread.



edit on 8 13 16 by Barcs because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 10:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Barcs
I have empirical evidence of trolling. Just read the thread.




That's nice but not relevant in the context of the thread

You were asked to provide empirical evidence on evolution

Please read all the trolling going on in the thread, it's observable, repeatable and testable, it's empirical



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: pthena

Oops, organic


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis? since you clearly know better than the rest of us, you must have a superior theory.


Come on TC, that's precious

I am asking for evidence of evolution, I am offering nothing, I am asking
I don't need an alternative do I?

Maybe is your hate of science you need a model to contest it.
Me, just empirical evidence
I know you can't leave your religion at the door, your hate for science at the door but I can

It's about evidence for evolution, leave your religious beliefs out of it please

Strawman



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: coldlikecustard
a reply to: spy66 granted but it also states that he divided the light of day and night BEFORE he placed the sun and moon in the dome of the sky. I would say that's 2 rather big holes in creation story within the first few lines



When God said: Let there be light. It was not the sun God created. God formed the firmament. Which later becomes Our universe.

This is confirmed in verse 8.

8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.


When God said let there be light. God did divide the light from darkness. Before God said let there be light there was just a absolute infinite empty Space,...No light. It was just the creator who is the absolute infinite empty Space.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: pthena
a reply to: TzarChasm


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis?

Intelligent design theory, PROVEN
I'm going to go check it out.


Thanks for the link.

says in the first line of the thread "kinda sorta". kinda sorta proven, like my dog is kinda sorta dead or my neighbor is kinda sorta pregnant.
edit on 13-8-2016 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: pthena
a reply to: TzarChasm


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis?

Intelligent design theory, PROVEN
I'm going to go check it out.


Sorry that you think it is more than a parody of your beliefs
It's all it was.

Also please be aware that that is a whole other thread dealing with a whole other topic
This thread is about empirical evidence not religion, faith or strawman arguments



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm

Funny isn't it TC
I am hounest enough to admit it is subjective, no empirical evidence
You can't

I am reluctant to share it here, it's off the topic I want to discuss, empirical evidence for evolution

Please discuss my other topic in that thread
I am sure that's how it works here
edit on 13-8-2016 by Raggedyman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: pthena

Oops, organic


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis? since you clearly know better than the rest of us, you must have a superior theory.


Come on TC, that's precious

I am asking for evidence of evolution, I am offering nothing, I am asking
I don't need an alternative do I?

Maybe is your hate of science you need a model to contest it.
Me, just empirical evidence
I know you can't leave your religion at the door, your hate for science at the door but I can

It's about evidence for evolution, leave your religious beliefs out of it please

Strawman


20 pages of playing ring around the rose with you, time for you to climb down from your pulpit and have a turn in the hot seat. Since this thread is about evolution AND creationism, we should trade places for a spell and examine your position. Your creationism model, if you please. Im sure we would all be fascinated to dissect it.
edit on 13-8-2016 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman





This thread is about empirical evidence not religion, faith or strawman arguments


Scroll up to the top and read the title. It mentions creation v evolution.



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: pthena

Oops, organic


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis? since you clearly know better than the rest of us, you must have a superior theory.


Come on TC, that's precious

I am asking for evidence of evolution, I am offering nothing, I am asking
I don't need an alternative do I?

Maybe is your hate of science you need a model to contest it.
Me, just empirical evidence
I know you can't leave your religion at the door, your hate for science at the door but I can

It's about evidence for evolution, leave your religious beliefs out of it please

Strawman


20 pages of playing ring around the rose with you, its your turn in the hot seat. Since this thread is about evolution AND creationism, we should trade places for a spell and examine your position. Your creationism model, if you please. Im sure we would all be fascinated to dissect it.


Twenty pages of scientifically illiterate evolutionists cowering away, strawman arguments and personal attacks
Yawn



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: pthena

Oops, organic


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis? since you clearly know better than the rest of us, you must have a superior theory.


Come on TC, that's precious

I am asking for evidence of evolution, I am offering nothing, I am asking
I don't need an alternative do I?

Maybe is your hate of science you need a model to contest it.
Me, just empirical evidence
I know you can't leave your religion at the door, your hate for science at the door but I can

It's about evidence for evolution, leave your religious beliefs out of it please

Strawman


20 pages of playing ring around the rose with you, its your turn in the hot seat. Since this thread is about evolution AND creationism, we should trade places for a spell and examine your position. Your creationism model, if you please. Im sure we would all be fascinated to dissect it.


Twenty pages of scientifically illiterate evolutionists cowering away, strawman arguments and personal attacks
Yawn


In other words, you are too kraven to take a chance and try to impress us with your own theories. It would be a shame if you got ragged on for forty pages because your model of creation is twice as holey (lolz) as our model of evolution. Is that why you drag your feet when asked to demonstrate your genius? Because its all hot air? Prove us wrong.
edit on 13-8-2016 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: spy66 Ok where in the bible does it say it was absolute infinite empty space I don't recall. also can you explain maybe I am being stupid but what light did he create if there was only empty infinite space. Surely there can not have been a night and day before the sun got there? it clearly says the there were DAYS and NIGHTS before the sun was placed in the dome of the sky. Does empty infinite space have days and nights? I Don't wish to sound like a troll or diminish your faith in anyway but as you are the only one kind enough to answer my initial question I am intrigued as to your take on that. Maybe I should ask a priest but quite frankly I am not the church going type lol



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: pthena

Oops, organic


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis? since you clearly know better than the rest of us, you must have a superior theory.


Come on TC, that's precious

I am asking for evidence of evolution, I am offering nothing, I am asking
I don't need an alternative do I?

Maybe is your hate of science you need a model to contest it.
Me, just empirical evidence
I know you can't leave your religion at the door, your hate for science at the door but I can

It's about evidence for evolution, leave your religious beliefs out of it please

Strawman


20 pages of playing ring around the rose with you, its your turn in the hot seat. Since this thread is about evolution AND creationism, we should trade places for a spell and examine your position. Your creationism model, if you please. Im sure we would all be fascinated to dissect it.


Twenty pages of scientifically illiterate evolutionists cowering away, strawman arguments and personal attacks
Yawn


In other words, you are too kraven to take a chance and try to impress us with your own theories. It would be a shame if you got ragged on for forty pages because your model of creation is twice as holy (lolz) as our model of evolution. Is that why you drag your feet when asked to demonstrate your genius? Because its all hot air? Prove us wrong.


Oh look, an opinion on the Internet, that's a new one...



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: coldlikecustard
a reply to: spy66 Ok where in the bible does it say it was absolute infinite empty space I don't recall. also can you explain maybe I am being stupid but what light did he create if there was only empty infinite space. Surely there can not have been a night and day before the sun got there? it clearly says the there were DAYS and NIGHTS before the sun was placed in the dome of the sky. Does empty infinite space have days and nights? I Don't wish to sound like a troll or diminish your faith in anyway but as you are the only one kind enough to answer my initial question I am intrigued as to your take on that. Maybe I should ask a priest but quite frankly I am not the church going type lol



It's hard enough to filter the strawman arguments, the personal attacks and the pointless drivel, never mind turning this into a religious lesson
With all respect, can you take the theology elsewhere, I would prefer to deal with empirical evidence and evolution

Thanks



posted on Aug, 13 2016 @ 11:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: pthena

Oops, organic


have you shared with the forum your creationism model which can presumably beat the pants off of modern evolutionary synthesis? since you clearly know better than the rest of us, you must have a superior theory.


Come on TC, that's precious

I am asking for evidence of evolution, I am offering nothing, I am asking
I don't need an alternative do I?

Maybe is your hate of science you need a model to contest it.
Me, just empirical evidence
I know you can't leave your religion at the door, your hate for science at the door but I can

It's about evidence for evolution, leave your religious beliefs out of it please

Strawman


20 pages of playing ring around the rose with you, its your turn in the hot seat. Since this thread is about evolution AND creationism, we should trade places for a spell and examine your position. Your creationism model, if you please. Im sure we would all be fascinated to dissect it.


Twenty pages of scientifically illiterate evolutionists cowering away, strawman arguments and personal attacks
Yawn


In other words, you are too kraven to take a chance and try to impress us with your own theories. It would be a shame if you got ragged on for forty pages because your model of creation is twice as holy (lolz) as our model of evolution. Is that why you drag your feet when asked to demonstrate your genius? Because its all hot air? Prove us wrong.


Oh look, an opinion on the Internet, that's a new one...


Oh look, a deflection on the internet, thats a new one...


originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: coldlikecustard
a reply to: spy66 Ok where in the bible does it say it was absolute infinite empty space I don't recall. also can you explain maybe I am being stupid but what light did he create if there was only empty infinite space. Surely there can not have been a night and day before the sun got there? it clearly says the there were DAYS and NIGHTS before the sun was placed in the dome of the sky. Does empty infinite space have days and nights? I Don't wish to sound like a troll or diminish your faith in anyway but as you are the only one kind enough to answer my initial question I am intrigued as to your take on that. Maybe I should ask a priest but quite frankly I am not the church going type lol



It's hard enough to filter the strawman arguments, the personal attacks and the pointless drivel, never mind turning this into a religious lesson
With all respect, can you take the theology elsewhere, I would prefer to deal with empirical evidence and evolution

Thanks


too late, creationism is in your thread title. now share with us your superior model of creationism. or do you not believe in reciprocation? you are a peer here, its not up to you to judge or dismiss discussion as though you are a court justice. and its your turn to present theories and evidence and defend them to your peers.
edit on 13-8-2016 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
9
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join