It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: pthena
Basically he wants a magic trick. A monkey changing to a dog in front of his eyes.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: pthena
Basically he wants a magic trick. A monkey changing to a dog in front of his eyes.
Basically I want empirical evidence, making up what you think I want shows me you still have nothing worth while
originally posted by: logicsoda
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: logicsoda
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: HoloShadow
Creation is an idea, Evolution is scientific fact, plain and simple.
Well come up with the empirical evidence, simple
We have. Why do you keep asking for empirical evidence when it has been shown to you on multiple occasions?
I must have missed it, please show me
You're not worth any further responses. Cheers.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: pthena
Basically he wants a magic trick. A monkey changing to a dog in front of his eyes.
Basically I want empirical evidence, making up what you think I want shows me you still have nothing worth while
You've said it yourself, so I wasn't "making it up".
Maybe you should re-read your OP?
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: pthena
Basically he wants a magic trick. A monkey changing to a dog in front of his eyes.
Basically I want empirical evidence, making up what you think I want shows me you still have nothing worth while
You've said it yourself, so I wasn't "making it up".
Maybe you should re-read your OP?
Yet still no empirical evidence...
originally posted by: logicsoda
If he wanted proof he should have said so.
If he is looking for the theory of evolution to be proven then that simply won't happen. We have evidence that can be repeatedly observed, tested, etc...
originally posted by: logicsoda
We have evidence that can be repeatedly observed, tested, etc...
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: logicsoda
The problem is, as i've said before... The OP is looking for Proof, not "evidence"
He wants to actually see something evolve for his evidence...
Personally i wouldn't mind seeing something "created" for evidence of Creationism
originally posted by: mouthfullofkefirgrains
well said, op…
I assumed the theory of evolution was legit for the longest time, even after realizing that Jesus Christ is Lord I still held to it…
now, even Hawking is saying their is probably an Intelligence behind the creation...
the more you dig on this topic the more obvious it becomes…
my current fave:
Genetic ENTROPY
yt: Prof. John Sanford on Genomic Entropy
youtu.be...
Geneticists:
Dr. Crow: we are inferior to caveman.
Dr. Knodrashov: no human geneticist doubts man is degenerating.
Dr. Lynch Even assuming a lower mutation rate, we are degenerating at 1%-5% per generation.
Implies a young Creation and as with DNA complexity, theory of evolution is unlikely.
Average cell in 15 yr old - up to 6,000 mutations per cell. (all your cells are different)
Skin cell in 60 yr old - up to 40,000 mutations
Mutations primary cause of aging and death.
“...little potential for substantially increasing the upper limit of human life span.” (upper limit: 120 yrs)
--Michael Lynch (Population Geneticist)
50% reduction in sperm count in men.
Around 100 new mutations per generation.
Dr. Francis Collins, head of Human Genome Project, converted to Christ partly due to the data he found working in genetics.
“And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment;”
Heb 1:10-11
“Intelligence must have been involved...”
--Dr. Antony Flew, 2004 (speaking about DNA complexity and his new-found belief in God. Dr. Flew was the author of “Theology and Falsification”, and was the foremost atheistic scientific writer of 20th Century)
originally posted by: blueman12
If only there was non-religious folks who didn't believe in evolution, I might actually give these anti-evolution arguements a shot.
Does anyone else get see RED flags when one side of an argument contains only religious folk?
originally posted by: Akragon
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: logicsoda
The problem is, as i've said before... The OP is looking for Proof, not "evidence"
He wants to actually see something evolve for his evidence...
Personally i wouldn't mind seeing something "created" for evidence of Creationism
Bingo. but see, you arent allowed to test gods or ask for demonstrations or they make an example of you. ...Lets make it happen.
lol... Not allowed?
I regularly poke that beast with no repercussions... aside from the occasional insult
that just requires a working knowledge of their book
originally posted by: Akragon
Its not like a weightlifter as you previously stated... the bone structure of a weightlifter doesn't change to accommodate lifting heavy weights... Otherwise i'd be a mutant myself, having practiced weightlifting in highschool
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: Raggedyman
much appreciated... i guess
Fortunately you have no right to dismiss me from this or any other thread...
Even IF its yours
originally posted by: blueman12
If only there was non-religious folks who didn't believe in evolution, I might actually give these anti-evolution arguements a shot.
Does anyone else get see RED flags when one side of an argument contains only religious folk?
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: Raggedyman
lol... you are amusing at least...
Perhaps thats why i went back on my statement that is pointless talking to you... at the very least i can usually get a laugh out of your demeaning and condescending rhetoric
an increase in bone mass is not the same as a change in skeletal structure...
And by the way, you really don't know anything about science, even compared to my limited knowledge...
im not getting all sciency on you... we in the real world call it logic
originally posted by: Barcs
originally posted by: blueman12
If only there was non-religious folks who didn't believe in evolution, I might actually give these anti-evolution arguements a shot.
Does anyone else get see RED flags when one side of an argument contains only religious folk?
To be fair, the anti evolution movement also contains some ancient alien theorists but they are in the extreme minority. The large majority today is a mix of religious fundamentalists and trolls. Mostly trolls.