It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Clean the oceans and seed the phytoplankton, providing positive social benefits to everyone, with massive public support, so we can temporarily wait on enacting carbon dioxide regulations?
I say the latter. There is massive public agreement. There is much more mature scientific research and certainty. The same mature science indicates both problems will be solved in the near term. And I believe the final cost will be less.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Indigo5
Excellent deconstruction, thank you.
However, I don't think that all educated people are "elite" - I am educated, so is my husband, my mother, my brother, my daughter.....and none of us are "elite."
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: jrod
Enact socially destructive energy policies that both increase the cost of energy, hurting the poor, and limit energy, creating less jobs and more poor, against public opinion, so we can temporarily overlook the oceanic pollution?
I would argue that renewable energies are advancing rapidly despite massive political opposition on the right and that it is and will directly benefit the poor.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Indigo5
I would argue that renewable energies are advancing rapidly despite massive political opposition on the right and that it is and will directly benefit the poor.
I work in that field. That is one of my areas of research.
Politics does not oppose energy research. Physics does. Engineers and scientists are not magicians. We have to work within the bounds of known physics. When the physicists give us something new, we try to run with it.
I know you won't accept this, but there's no magic bullet being held behind closed doors by fat greedy guys laughing maniacally.