It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

humanoid on quero spain 1925

page: 2
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 8 2016 @ 11:13 AM
link   
a reply to: EnhancedInterrogator
Umm but motorized and controlable by a ipad like device?




posted on Aug, 8 2016 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: EnhancedInterrogator
Umm but motorized and controlable by a ipad like device?

Well, the account says that the humanoid used the "blower" to propel himself around on the wheel, although if you think about it if the humanoid was holding it in front of him, the only way he could really go would be backwards. So the witness probably made a connection between the two things that wasn't really there.
edit on 8-8-2016 by Blue Shift because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 8 2016 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord
aniway i was tinking coud the device the being is tapping o some sort of touchscreen device like a ipad?
1 point for the time traveller theory i guess
on a unrelated note jeep3r could you make a cgi illustration of the scene like you did on the ezechieel sighting thread?

You must be kidding, no doubt!


Turning that into a CGI scene would be very time consuming and character modelling isn't necessarily one of my strengths. I therefore doubt that the outcome would be any better than the nice artwork posted earlier.



posted on Aug, 8 2016 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: jeep3r

sorry i thougth you could do it



posted on Aug, 8 2016 @ 06:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: jeep3r

sorry i thougth you could do it


ah...here is something better



posted on Aug, 8 2016 @ 06:57 PM
link   
a reply to: ZetaRediculian

Lol



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 12:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord



Sir, informed of your interest in collecting data about flying saucers and aliens, I am writing to you to let you know a fact, not a dream. It occurred to me over 40 years ago. Somewhere in La Mancha [sic], very close to a church building, suddenly I found myself with a very strange being. Its height was approximately 1.20 meters, clothing, like a green uniform. His arms and legs were stiff and stuck to the body. In his hands he held a blower circle of about 20 cm in diameter, flexible, with a pinging sound. His legs and feet rigid, united to an axis, which by turning a small wheel, he “walked” in my direction, driven by the effects of the blower which he carried in his hands.

4.bp.blogspot.com... ombrecillo%2Bde%2Bla%2BMancha.jpg
here we have an interesting encounter of the pre rosswel era showing a humaoid using strange technology
originally reported on the book:"ENCUENTROS CON HUMANOIDES"


The Roswell event is not properly being used by you as a reference. If you were to use it as a mention of a flawed event where fantasy overrode the facts then you're okay. But to use Roswell in a sentence that includes "interesting encounter" and "humanoid" you're way off base. Stick to the original facts which do not report alien UFO debris or humanoids or anything else than what made a balloon train.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 11:04 AM
link   
a reply to: klassless

Please dont derail the thread



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 02:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: klassless

Please dont derail the thread


Derail? I quoted your comments and I offered mine. That's NOT derailing, it's staying within the thread contents.

You said: originally posted by: humanoidlord

4.bp.blogspot.com... ombrecillo%2Bde%2Bla%2BMancha.jpg
here we have an interesting encounter of the pre rosswel era showing a humaoid using strange technology
originally reported on the book:"ENCUENTROS CON HUMANOIDES"


You used "interesting encounter" and "humanoid". Neither has a connection to "rosswel"(sic). Perhaps in future threads you might think twice before posting. If your thread had stuck to the title subject: "humanoid on quero spain 1925" and not gone off-field by using "rosswel"(sic) as a reference I wouldn't have participated. But you did and here I am calling you out.


edit on 07/03/2016 by klassless because: To correct format.

edit on 07/03/2016 by klassless because: To correct format.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 04:49 PM
link   
a reply to: klassless

ignore that referece i used roswell because a bunch of close minded ufologists think is the start of the ufo phenomena



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: klassless

You used "interesting encounter" and "humanoid". Neither has a connection to "rosswel"(sic). Perhaps in future threads you might think twice before posting. If your thread had stuck to the title subject: "humanoid on quero spain 1925" and not gone off-field by using "rosswel"(sic) as a reference I wouldn't have participated. But you did and here I am calling you out.


I'm not sure what the objection is. Roswell is pretty much considered the landmark case for ufology. So as a reference point, I think its a fair point. I guess he could have said "pre WW2" but that wouldn't make much sense since the topic is aliens. Anyway, I think its interesting that someone from the 20s drew a picture of some "tech" that has only just recently emerged in our time. Of course there could be a 100 ways to explain it but still its uncanny.



posted on Aug, 9 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   
Oh yes and Science Fiction is such a modern term...



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 01:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: klassless

You used "interesting encounter" and "humanoid". Neither has a connection to "rosswel"(sic). Perhaps in future threads you might think twice before posting. If your thread had stuck to the title subject: "humanoid on quero spain 1925" and not gone off-field by using "rosswel"(sic) as a reference I wouldn't have participated. But you did and here I am calling you out.


I'm not sure what the objection is. Roswell is pretty much considered the landmark case for ufology. So as a reference point, I think its a fair point. I guess he could have said "pre WW2" but that wouldn't make much sense since the topic is aliens. Anyway, I think its interesting that someone from the 20s drew a picture of some "tech" that has only just recently emerged in our time. Of course there could be a 100 ways to explain it but still its uncanny.


It's really a simple situation. The OP, humanoidlord, titled his thread "humanoid on quero spain 1925" and started the thread with the following comment:

here we have an interesting encounter of the pre rosswel(sic) era showing a humaoid using strange technology
originally reported on the book:"ENCUENTROS CON HUMANOIDES"


The OP obviously believes that Roswell is a significant event in UFOlogy associated with humanoids based on the popular, Hollywood-type version. I say Hollywood-type version to separate it from the reality of the event which had nothing to do with UFOs or humanoids. So it's not a reference. But I understand the OP's intent and I have to criticize it. Talk about your subject and stick to the "facts" or reported information. There is no need to qualify it by comparing 'cause the comparison is not there, only in the OP's mind.

You say "Roswell is pretty much considered the landmark case for ufology." That may be so to those who mistakenly believe the popular version that strays from the truth. So it is not a landmark case to everybody and it is not open to be a blanket explanation.

So what we have is an OP who starts a thread about nothing! The link he includes takes you to a page showing an awful, meaningless drawing from which nothing can be taken. Then the OP says the tale came from a Spanish book which has 2 different covers (but same author). The book can be considered from our POV to be hearsay as the OP doesn't offer anything of substance. It's an empty thread. And besides giving us nothing to digest, he tries to give it legitimacy by using a non-event!

edit on 07/03/2016 by klassless because: To correct grammar.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 10:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: klassless

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: klassless

You used "interesting encounter" and "humanoid". Neither has a connection to "rosswel"(sic). Perhaps in future threads you might think twice before posting. If your thread had stuck to the title subject: "humanoid on quero spain 1925" and not gone off-field by using "rosswel"(sic) as a reference I wouldn't have participated. But you did and here I am calling you out.


I'm not sure what the objection is. Roswell is pretty much considered the landmark case for ufology. So as a reference point, I think its a fair point. I guess he could have said "pre WW2" but that wouldn't make much sense since the topic is aliens. Anyway, I think its interesting that someone from the 20s drew a picture of some "tech" that has only just recently emerged in our time. Of course there could be a 100 ways to explain it but still its uncanny.


It's really a simple situation. The OP, humanoidlord, titled his thread "humanoid on quero spain 1925" and started the thread with the following comment:

here we have an interesting encounter of the pre rosswel(sic) era showing a humaoid using strange technology
originally reported on the book:"ENCUENTROS CON HUMANOIDES"


The OP obviously believes that Roswell is a significant event in UFOlogy associated with humanoids based on the popular, Hollywood-type version. I say Hollywood-type version to separate it from the reality of the event which had nothing to do with UFOs or humanoids. So it's not a reference. But I understand the OP's intent and I have to criticize it. Talk about your subject and stick to the "facts" or reported information. There is no need to qualify it by comparing 'cause the comparison is not there, only in the OP's mind.

You say "Roswell is pretty much considered the landmark case for ufology." That may be so to those who mistakenly believe the popular version that strays from the truth. So it is not a landmark case to everybody and it is not open to be a blanket explanation.

So what we have is an OP who starts a thread about nothing! The link he includes takes you to a page showing an awful, meaningless drawing from which nothing can be taken. Then the OP says the tale came from a Spanish book which has 2 different covers (but same author). The book can be considered from our POV to be hearsay as the OP doesn't offer anything of substance. It's an empty thread. And besides giving us nothing to digest, he tries to give it legitimacy by using a non-event!


Dude are you okay?



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: klassless

Wtf
Did you just completely demolish my thread because i used the term roswell to express the start of the popularity of the ufo phenomena?
Something ufologists have been using since the 70s?
Sleep and calm down please



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 11:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

My points exaclity
Lets get back on topic please



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 05:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: klassless

Wtf
Did you just completely demolish my thread because i used the term roswell to express the start of the popularity of the ufo phenomena?
Something ufologists have been using since the 70s?
Sleep and calm down please


rosswel(sic) was just a point. Since I'm allowed to comment, your thread is worthless. You offer nothing of substance to the members to digest. You include a cartoon and mention a book title that's in Spanish. Do you really expect anyone to find that book and read it to confirm your dependence on its contents when no one can ever verify the story? You don't respect the ATS policy with regard to a thread's opening statement about the subject that presents your views and your reasoning. I'm surprised a Mod didn't jump in and mention this.

Your thread is equal to a Hot Pockets sandwich: an empty cavity. You starved us of a meaningful dialogue.


here we have an interesting encounter of the pre rosswel era showing a humaoid using strange technology
originally reported on the book:"ENCUENTROS CON HUMANOIDES"


Roswell didn't start the popularity of the UFO phenomena:

6 Mysterious UFO Crashes that Happened BEFORE Roswell
locklip.com...

UFO Sightings Before Roswell
science.howstuffworks.com...

Research is worth the effort.

edit on 07/03/2016 by klassless because: To add text.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 05:59 PM
link   
a reply to: klassless

lets get back on topic



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: klassless

lets get back on topic


There is not topic.

NOTICE: AboveTopSecret.com management is now enforcing new standards for the opening posts of threads.

Opening posts that contain minimal content, links with little or no explanation, YouTube videos with no commentary, images with little or no commentary, and similar nominal content may be removed without warning or explanation. If your topic is important to you, make sure you explain why, with links and supporting material so that our members may offer more relevant contributions, and ultimately, better threads. In fact, if you have less to say than this simple notice, then you probably do not have enough to start a new thread. Thank you for your assistance in helping to create great threads on ATS.



posted on Aug, 10 2016 @ 07:47 PM
link   
a reply to: klassless

There a sighting of an anomalous being



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join