It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: texasyeti
Could it be a destroyed planet orbiting the star or an astroid field ring?
originally posted by: asen_y2k
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: asen_y2k
Why couldn't the slight (3%) dimming be caused by a thin space-dust cloud coming between Earth and Tabby? The space version of what happens on Earth when cirrus clouds "dim" the moon at night.
Because then it should go away after some time. Every time Tabby's star dimmed, it stayed that way, it never recovered. This dimming pattern is also not regular. And it has been constantly dimming for the last 100 years or so. It dims, stays that way, then dims further. Can be explained with construction activity in periodic phases. Moreover, no other star till date shows such activity.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
Can Kepler detect a Black hole and its potential non reflective debris, either coming in visual path between view points or even near the Tabby Star directly interacting with KIC 8462852, that may be obscuring the observations of KIC 8462852 activities 1480 yrs ago?
originally posted by: asen_y2kSo, everyone remembers Tabby's star, the wierd star, which was thought to have a Dyson sphere around it. Then, it was eventually dismissed by comet cloud theory. Well, now after a long term obsrvation (results above), we will have to rule out comets. No one is saying it out loud, but it looks more like 'Alien Megastructures'.
KIC 8462852 - The Infrared Flux
Massimo Marengo, Alan Hulsebus, Sarah Willis (Submitted on 24 Nov 2015)
We analyzed the warm Spitzer/IRAC data of KIC 8462852. We found no evidence of infrared excess at 3.6 micron and a small excess of 0.43 +/- 0.18 mJy at 4.5 micron, below the 3 sigma threshold necessary to claim a detection. The lack of strong infrared excess 2 years after the events responsible for the unusual light curve observed by Kepler, further disfavors the scenarios involving a catastrophic collision in a KIC 8462852 asteroid belt, a giant impact disrupting a planet in the system or a population of a dust-enshrouded planetesimals. The scenario invoking the fragmentation of a family of comets on a highly elliptical orbit is instead consistent with the lack of strong infrared excess found by our analysis.
originally posted by: Lassiecat
a reply to: asen_y2k
Maybe the star has some space illness, out of the box the stars didn't do that, I think the owner should try return it to coca cola company and reclaim his money back guarantee. Anyway it's not polite to sell broken stars anymore.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
a reply to: asen_y2k
Very interesting star.
So the whole star loses brightness? Dims independant from some kind of blockage?
I get that right?
Maybe it's a cosmic highway sign? Artificial maybe?
originally posted by: PrairieShepherd
So, purely from a speculative and hypothetical perspective, what if it's a different kind of device?
originally posted by: NeoSpace
Perhaps an artificial intelligence has taken over their solar system and built itself something like the replicators from StarGate.