Decided to read a few of the debunker's posts. A few weren't going on about how the Mandela Effect is fake, but asking why I gave the title I did.. so
I can respond to that.
So the article says that they were going to fire up the LHC for this experiment, but now they are not as the data that was there isn't there now,
therefore no need to fire it up.
That seems like a ridiculously long title..
So I paraphrased the article just like standard news agencies do - I guess I could of said "LHC Test Suspended", so I'll give you that.
However - the LHC was supposed to be brought on-line and it wasn't, therefore LHC suspended. Suspended means halted btw.
Furthermore, I gave the source for all to see - if I was trying to hoax something (which I don't do) I wouldn't put a link to the correct information
nearby. lol ..You have to admit your claim sounds silly.
At any rate - I have a feeling the real issue is that the naysayers don't like how I interpreted the article - but it's my interpretation in my post.
A simple solution is for you to create a post that gives your interpretation of the info - which you have. What more do you have to add?
My interpretation of the article in a nutshell said:
"They had a bump, but they can't recreate it, therefore the test they were going to fire the LHC up for has been suspended. Isn't that like the
I don't see any issue with that interpretation - or I wouldn't of posted it. I don't care if you don't like my interpretation of it - I put it out
there for others that feel the same way I do to talk about - not you (although you're welcome to, it's just not for
Being that angry all the time can't be healthy. It certainly isn't healthy for conversation - which is why you're largely ignored by me (I want you to
be healthy). You simply aren't productive to the topic, past saying you disagree.
Hope that clears that up, carry on.
Edit to add:
Quick note - you know moderators have been in this thread - you can see their actions. If the moderators felt like I was trying to hoax something they
would of taken action immediately. Are you saying the moderators don't do a good job? I for one would be a little frustrated with you (as a moderator)
for trying to tell me how to do my job. Which is exactly what you're trying to do, because you don't like the info presented.. Very transparent and
You're a kid in a classroom trying to tell the teacher how their class should be ran.
edit on 6-8-2016 by Pearj because: (no reason given)