It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did Fallen Angels slept with the grandchildren of Adam & Eve?

page: 6
7
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN




Some Native American Shamans MUST sacrifice one of their children


Can you point to any studies that this actually happened? I know the South American Aztecs practised it.




What a "fatherly" deed.


Correct me if I'm wrong but your demiurge jehovah did the same thing with his son




posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 02:40 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Chemosh is Shemosh then too I see from your comment, the sun god.

Bible translation is a dirty business, huh?



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 02:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: tikbalang

Impossible. We can't have children with other species of animals. What makes you think we'd be able to be to have children with a lifeform that would have no where near the same DNA as us? So I don't think that is something you need to worry about. Hell it's far more likely that an alien and a human couldn't have sex altogether, but if it is possible no kids could come of it. That is a guarantee.


God created man on the 6th day. It is stated in Genesis Chapter one.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
.

Adam and Eve were formed by someone else (Lord God) in Genesis Chapter 2. These hybrids could very well propagate With these watcher.

These watcher had to go to a specific Place to find these hybrids. They descended to the summit of Mount Hermon, in the days of Jared, to acquire wives and lead men astray. Adam and Eve were also put at a specific Place. And they were lead astray.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

I did, dont breed



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 02:49 PM
link   
a reply to: one4all




Ya....some eat us...all the more reason to arm up...to get some working models of defensive tech online and being built.Our Military is inept as are the Shadow groups....nothing even remotely comes close to the power of the internet and global crowdsourcing of cerebral horsepower . Ohhh...you just had to mention the "some eat us" part didnt you huh?....lol....I try to keep that thought in my backpocket....lol.



well if we don't eat each other the moon may...

gurdjieffclub.com...



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN




He emphasized HIS STANDARDS very starkly in the OT. IN the NT He emphasized His Love


Well until you get to the misogynist St Paul, not much love there, ...the fifth columnist of the Old Roman Empire...



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: RudeCherub




The abuse/slander on celestial beings ie Heavenly messengers [angel is literally translated messenger] is the myth God's angels fell, and/or were carnal. Short conclusion; Paul's advice on myths


I wouldn't hold much truth in Sauls/Pauls words - The Roman/Jew Trojan horse

www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com...


There is some evidence that after his own death, Jesus intended his brother James to take over his ministry and lead the remaining Jewish followers. Josephus refers to James taking over, and appears to refer to James as Christ, though the passage is ambiguous*. The Gospel of St Thomas refers to Jesus naming James as the disciples" leader after his own departure*. In the Secret Book of James, James occupies the dominant role sometimes attributed to Peter in canonical writings*.Church Fathers were aware that James had taken over the leadership of the apostles, and he was acknowledged to have been the first Bishop of Jerusalem*. Furthermore it is clear from the New Testament that James (recognised by the Church as James the Just) enjoyed primacy over the other disciples*. For example James alone makes the final decision about the dietary laws (Acts 15:13-20). A passage in Galatians gives James's name before Peter's , indicating relative rank (Galatians 2:9). Another makes it clear that Peter felt himself subject to James (Galatians 2:11-12).



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN




It was just not considered thoroughly reliable ENOUGH to be Canon.


What books were included/excluded was ultimately a political decision - what is telling is that the Roman Emperor Constantine did not become a christian until a "deathbed conversion"
How convenient...

At least don't be economical with the truth



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 03:13 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN




Even though the story of Lilith disappeared from the canonical Bible, her daughters the lilim haunted men for over a thousand years. It was well into that Middle Ages that Jews still manufactured amulets to keep away the lilim. Supposedly they were lusty she-demons who copulated with men in all their dreams, causing nocturnal emissions.


The above is from the OP...care to stay on topic or are you going to derail again with your diversions - either look at gnosticism and jehovah with a critical eye in respect to this thread or keep your proselytising to Sunday mornings



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN





Dr Chuck Missler and his sources ferreted out.


Missler has been debunked - Next?



articles.exchristian.net...


Missler has a seemingly impressive background. Missler's Beliefs The following is a small sampling of ridiculous biblical theories put forth or endorsed by Missler and his ministry over the years. Many of these have been debunked and some are no longer promoted by Missler.

1. He thought the face on Mars indicated that there are Martians who are planning an attack on earth via the moon which would signal the start of the Tribulation. It has been a number of years since he has said this.

2. He thinks that once Mars was so close to earth that you could see its two moons. The proof offered was that Jonathan Swift in his famous book, Gulliver's Travels (1726), describes Mars as having two small moons, way before these two moons were discovered in 1877 by Asaph Hall. He explains this by saying that Mars in ancient times was very close to the earth so man could see these two moons. Then Jupiter ejected a comet (now the planet Venus) which passed close to earth, causing the plagues of Egypt, and parting the Red Sea for Moses. Centuries later Venus jolted Mars into its present orbit. This theory is a delusional fantasy that is devoid of facts.

3.He believes the Bible is one single, harmonious, unified, inspired book, and every detail, every word, every letter, was put there by the authorship of the holy spirit for a reason. He believes this regardless of the well- supported fact that the bible is mostly pseudographical, and has been edited, revised, and embellished many times over.

4. He considers the war in Iraq a prelude to the establishment of the Antichrist’s kingdom on earth, as foretold in the Book of Revelations. He believed and promoted the same type of scenario in regard to the potential nuclear exchange between the U.S. and the Soviet Union In the 1980's.

5. He was among the group of doomsday quacks that believed and preached that the Y2K glitch would usher in the "end times". Missler has many, many other wild theories and claims he has concocted and supported over the years. His website is www.khouse.org. Now, on to the Koinonia House news journal........... This is a monthly "journal" newsletter that is nothing more than a propaganda/profiteering venture. The first part of this booklet-style piece is the propaganda. There is an abundance of rationalization of skeptical questioning, circular reasoning, question-begging, and wild unsupported theories that attempt to discredit biblical criticism on all points. In the most recent issue, vol. 15, #5, under "physics update" right in the middle of the cover it reads " WAS EINSTEIN WRONG?" We will see that even though he claims this to be an "update", there is nothing new or updated in the entire article. It is simply an attack on Einstein's theory of relativity by creation "scientists" seeking to corroborate science and the bible by any means necessary. In the article, Dr. Michael Murphy, who studied light from distant quasars, claims that "the findings suggest that there is a more fundamental theory of the way that light and matter interact; and that special relativity, at it's foundation, is actually wrong." The originator of this theory is Barry Setterfield, who in 1981 first examined this as a possibility, and was rejected by the vast majority of the scientific community. Even the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) has long ago rejected this hypothesis as ridiculous. So Murphy's remanufacturing of the issue here is beating a dead horse. This article is an obvious attempt at resurrecting this debunked and widely rejected theory as fact to it's under-educated readers who will blindly accept whatever apologists like Missler say. At the end of the article, Missler's true intentions can be uncovered by this transparent attempt at a disclaimer. He says "Needless to say, this view is highly controversial and THE MAJORITY OF PHYSICISTS HAVE REJECTED SETTERFIELD'S HYPOTHESIS. However, IF such a theory were EVENTUALLY proven correct, it would dramatically alter our concepts of the physical universe. And the REMARKS of Dr. Michael Murphy last month MAY be another small step in that direction."(emphasis mine) So you see, Missler is using a high degree of smoke and mirrors here. What a shame. So, the lay christian reader is left with the unmistakable impression that this long rejected theory is valid and will soon be proven true by creation scientists. This type of outright deception is deplorable.



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: one4all




Ya....some eat us...all the more reason to arm up...to get some working models of defensive tech online and being built.Our Military is inept as are the Shadow groups....nothing even remotely comes close to the power of the internet and global crowdsourcing of cerebral horsepower . Ohhh...you just had to mention the "some eat us" part didnt you huh?....lol....I try to keep that thought in my backpocket....lol.



well if we don't eat each other the moon may...

gurdjieffclub.com...


The moon gives us tidal action, motion = sound = life,the moon is a tool it seems,and by some reasoning it stays here.It could very well be the only thing allowing us to live on this Planet for all we know.Can life exist without motion?On a water planet can the absence of a moon mean an absence of life?

I can grasp where the idea of interdependancy comes from and that the earth is somehow feeding the moon something in a synergistic universally natural way.We do produce 6+ billion human-watts of electricity,for whatever that is worth,and energy being energy cannot be destroyed,being pulled up off of the earth at death meaning you get to become one with an energy source again or heaven could equate to an energy transfer from Earth to Moon,possibly the Moon has an electrical requirement tuned into the energy signatures we are showing when we die and our energy changes form.Maybe we get "attracted" or our energy does to the Moon and maybe the Moon consumes this energy in a mechanical way and then possibly sends the energy in a different form right back where it came from.

Well I guess if we can see life-sparks being attracted and then converted into Ganesh particles and other material forms the idea of some type of moon symbiotic relationship between our manifesting energy could easily be possible.



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 03:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Utnapisjtim

Don't forget that in-breeding is proscribed for the commoner and yet practised by the nobility for various reasons.



telomeres so that humans should live no longer than 120 years.


The holy grail of research - why return every few thousand years with a flood when you build man with the seeds of his own destruction



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: NOTurTypical


Yahweh is the imposter - Baal
12tribes.blog-pad.com...



What the Hebrew Lexicon Reveals What does the Lexicon reveal about the names Jehovah and Yahweh? Surprisingly, it reveals that this god is NOT who the ancient Israelites looked to for guidance, but is actually the god of the Phoenicians. And his name is: Ba’al. That’s right: Ba’al. Let’s take look at some proof:

In the Hebrew Lexicon, at reference number 1180, you will see that Jehovah is Ba’al. The Lexicon reveals that Strong’s number 1180 comes from Strong’s number 1167. B



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 04:02 PM
link   
a reply to: ElGoobero




3) some of these angels were so attracted to human females that they gave in to the desires of their human bodies and coupled with them. the resulting progeny were the infamous Nephilim. (Greek myths are full of such stories, such as Hercules' origin.) the New Testament emphasizes that Jesus took human form and sinned not, perhaps intended as a rebuke to these fallen ones. some of these may be the imprisoned spirits Jesus spoke to, mentioned in I Peter 3:19. 4) there's a theory that the tainted bloodline threatened to overcome humanity and this was part of the reason for the flood. supposedly a tiny strain of the giant blood remained, leading to Goliath and his family, all presumably exterminated.


So if the flood destroyed their bodies and yet their spirit walks the earth - then likewise when man dies his spirit walks the earth? What sort of god would allow resurrection of man after death and yet keep the fallen captive on this earth to do more mischief?



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 04:19 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN

and yet you flood every religious thread with the same ol...you completely ignore such minorissues like infanticide/human sacrifice

If the root is tainted how can the branch be holy?
How can the New Testament have any allegiance to the Lofty Jealous Homicidal Mountain god of the Canaanites/Israelites?

Only by the State enforced Sword of the Old Roman Empire was Pauline Christianity allowed to flourish. The evidence is in plain sight that Easter and Xmas are celebrated on Pagan holy days.


30ce.com...


The Central Difference The central difference between Yeshua's teaching and Paul's church was in justification by faith. Paul believed the statement in Ephesians 2:8: "You have been saved by God's love and kindness because you believed. It was not because of anything you did, but it was a gift from God." Yeshua said repeatedly what was reported in John 3:3: "'I tell you the truth. No person can see God's kingdom if he is not born again.'" And in another form in Luke 17:20-21: "The kingdom of God does not come visibly, nor will people say 'Here it is,' or 'There it is,' because the kingdom of God is within you." Humankind was to develop its own salvation by changing within. No one would give it to a person as a gift.



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN




There were merely LOTS of fallen angels who did not take up bodies to hump human women and were therefore, not killed in the flood. Those that were, their spirits became demons. Those who had not taken the mortal body route to hump women . . . some at later times, after the flood, DID do so-


But that fails on its own logic - if women were so attractive to the angels why weren't all the angels in physical bodies -

secondly...
As the flood approached they had plenty of time to jump out of their skins.

FAIL



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 04:28 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN

again you respond with na na na...hands over ears - what does that say about you? Condescending one liners - special place in heaven for you...



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 04:35 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN




Thankfully, you weren't there to throw rocks at the process. What I believe has been birthed out of the nitty gritty of my life. You don't have to believe that. You could, instead, go chase a duck or suck rocks in terms of the usefulness of your blather.


There you go...you cant help yourself...it was only a matter of time before you started your "cursing" as you do in most threads you derail. Your posting history judges you.

Obviously you dont pay attention to your own scriptures

Matthew 15:11


What goes into someone's mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them."



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 04:38 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN




endeavor to stay 'confessed-up,' 'repented-up,' 'forgiving-up'


Didn't Jesus also say not to gloat - like you're doing now?



posted on Aug, 6 2016 @ 04:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Muffenstuff

Laurence Gardner has an interesting take on things

www.graal.co.uk...


When the Ark of the Covenant was completed, Aaron was said to have placed an omer of manna into the Ark. This sacred manna was commonly associated with a mystical form of bread: the shewbread or, as it was called in Tubal-cain's Mesopotamia, the shem-an-na. At this point, we come to a particularly important definition of the shewbread for, according to the Master Craftsmen, this conically-shaped (or shem-shaped) food was made of 'highward fire-stone'.

Before investigating the precise nature of the white stone of the shem-an-na (the bread made from the white powder of alchemical gold), it is worth considering the famous statue of Priest-king Melchizedek at Chartres Cathedral in France. The statue portrays Melchizedek with a cup containing a stone in representation of the bread and wine which he apparently offered to Abraham, according to the book of Genesis. The wine, as we know, was emblematic of the sacred Star Fire (just as Communion wine represents the Messianic blood today), but the true importance of the imagery is that the bread/stone is held within the cup, thereby signifying that Star Fire was replaced by a substitute nourishment at the very time of Melchizedek and Abraham. This substitute was made from shem-an-na - the white powder of gold, which the Mesopotamians called 'highward fire-stone'.


also
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...




Bible translation is a dirty business, huh?


Can be fun when you read between the lines...what are they hiding in plain sight?



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join